-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Recent similarity in distribution ranges does not mean a similar postglacial history: a phylogeographical study of the boreal tree species Alnus incana based on microsatellite and chloroplast DNA variation
B. Mandák, A. Havrdová, K. Krak, V. Hadincová, P. Vít, P. Zákravský, J. Douda,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Free Medical Journals
od 1902 do Před 1 rokem
Wiley Free Content
od 1997 do Před 1 rokem
PubMed
26831816
DOI
10.1111/nph.13848
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- Bayesova věta MeSH
- DNA chloroplastová genetika MeSH
- fylogeografie MeSH
- genetická variace MeSH
- haplotypy MeSH
- mikrosatelitní repetice genetika MeSH
- olše genetika MeSH
- populační genetika * MeSH
- stromy MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
We reconstructed the historical pattern of postglacial biogeographic range expansion of the boreal tree species Alnus incana in Europe. To assess population genetic structure and diversity, we performed a combined analysis of nuclear microsatellite loci and chloroplast DNA sequences (65 populations, 1004 individuals). Analysis of haplotype and microsatellite diversity revealed that southeastern refugial populations situated in the Carpathians and the Balkan Peninsula did not spread north and cannot be considered as important source populations for postglacial recolonization of Europe; populations in Eastern Europe did not establish Fennoscandian populations; populations in Fennoscandia and Eastern Europe have no unique genetic cluster, but represent a mix with a predominant cluster typical for Central Europe; and that colonization of Fennoscandia and Eastern Europe took place from Central Europe. Our findings highlight the importance of an effective refugium in Central Europe located outside classical southern refugia confirming the existence of northern refugia for boreal trees in Europe. The postglacial range expansion of A. incana did not follow the model established for Picea abies. Fennoscandian populations are not derived from Eastern European ones, but from Central European ones.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18011302
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180404142723.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180404s2016 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1111/nph.13848 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)26831816
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Mandák, Bohumil $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21, Praha 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Recent similarity in distribution ranges does not mean a similar postglacial history: a phylogeographical study of the boreal tree species Alnus incana based on microsatellite and chloroplast DNA variation / $c B. Mandák, A. Havrdová, K. Krak, V. Hadincová, P. Vít, P. Zákravský, J. Douda,
- 520 9_
- $a We reconstructed the historical pattern of postglacial biogeographic range expansion of the boreal tree species Alnus incana in Europe. To assess population genetic structure and diversity, we performed a combined analysis of nuclear microsatellite loci and chloroplast DNA sequences (65 populations, 1004 individuals). Analysis of haplotype and microsatellite diversity revealed that southeastern refugial populations situated in the Carpathians and the Balkan Peninsula did not spread north and cannot be considered as important source populations for postglacial recolonization of Europe; populations in Eastern Europe did not establish Fennoscandian populations; populations in Fennoscandia and Eastern Europe have no unique genetic cluster, but represent a mix with a predominant cluster typical for Central Europe; and that colonization of Fennoscandia and Eastern Europe took place from Central Europe. Our findings highlight the importance of an effective refugium in Central Europe located outside classical southern refugia confirming the existence of northern refugia for boreal trees in Europe. The postglacial range expansion of A. incana did not follow the model established for Picea abies. Fennoscandian populations are not derived from Eastern European ones, but from Central European ones.
- 650 _2
- $a olše $x genetika $7 D029661
- 650 _2
- $a Bayesova věta $7 D001499
- 650 _2
- $a DNA chloroplastová $x genetika $7 D018742
- 650 _2
- $a genetická variace $7 D014644
- 650 12
- $a populační genetika $7 D005828
- 650 _2
- $a haplotypy $7 D006239
- 650 _2
- $a mikrosatelitní repetice $x genetika $7 D018895
- 650 _2
- $a fylogeografie $7 D058974
- 650 _2
- $a stromy $7 D014197
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Havrdová, Alena $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21, Praha 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Krak, Karol $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21, Praha 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Hadincová, Věroslava $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vít, Petr $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21, Praha 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Zákravský, Petr $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Douda, Jan $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21, Praha 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00007692 $t The New phytologist $x 1469-8137 $g Roč. 210, č. 4 (2016), s. 1395-407
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26831816 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180404 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180404142803 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1288787 $s 1008114
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 210 $c 4 $d 1395-407 $e 20160201 $i 1469-8137 $m New phytologist $n New Phytol $x MED00007692
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180404