• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Recent similarity in distribution ranges does not mean a similar postglacial history: a phylogeographical study of the boreal tree species Alnus incana based on microsatellite and chloroplast DNA variation

B. Mandák, A. Havrdová, K. Krak, V. Hadincová, P. Vít, P. Zákravský, J. Douda,

. 2016 ; 210 (4) : 1395-407. [pub] 20160201

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18011302

We reconstructed the historical pattern of postglacial biogeographic range expansion of the boreal tree species Alnus incana in Europe. To assess population genetic structure and diversity, we performed a combined analysis of nuclear microsatellite loci and chloroplast DNA sequences (65 populations, 1004 individuals). Analysis of haplotype and microsatellite diversity revealed that southeastern refugial populations situated in the Carpathians and the Balkan Peninsula did not spread north and cannot be considered as important source populations for postglacial recolonization of Europe; populations in Eastern Europe did not establish Fennoscandian populations; populations in Fennoscandia and Eastern Europe have no unique genetic cluster, but represent a mix with a predominant cluster typical for Central Europe; and that colonization of Fennoscandia and Eastern Europe took place from Central Europe. Our findings highlight the importance of an effective refugium in Central Europe located outside classical southern refugia confirming the existence of northern refugia for boreal trees in Europe. The postglacial range expansion of A. incana did not follow the model established for Picea abies. Fennoscandian populations are not derived from Eastern European ones, but from Central European ones.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18011302
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180404142723.0
007      
ta
008      
180404s2016 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/nph.13848 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)26831816
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Mandák, Bohumil $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21, Praha 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Recent similarity in distribution ranges does not mean a similar postglacial history: a phylogeographical study of the boreal tree species Alnus incana based on microsatellite and chloroplast DNA variation / $c B. Mandák, A. Havrdová, K. Krak, V. Hadincová, P. Vít, P. Zákravský, J. Douda,
520    9_
$a We reconstructed the historical pattern of postglacial biogeographic range expansion of the boreal tree species Alnus incana in Europe. To assess population genetic structure and diversity, we performed a combined analysis of nuclear microsatellite loci and chloroplast DNA sequences (65 populations, 1004 individuals). Analysis of haplotype and microsatellite diversity revealed that southeastern refugial populations situated in the Carpathians and the Balkan Peninsula did not spread north and cannot be considered as important source populations for postglacial recolonization of Europe; populations in Eastern Europe did not establish Fennoscandian populations; populations in Fennoscandia and Eastern Europe have no unique genetic cluster, but represent a mix with a predominant cluster typical for Central Europe; and that colonization of Fennoscandia and Eastern Europe took place from Central Europe. Our findings highlight the importance of an effective refugium in Central Europe located outside classical southern refugia confirming the existence of northern refugia for boreal trees in Europe. The postglacial range expansion of A. incana did not follow the model established for Picea abies. Fennoscandian populations are not derived from Eastern European ones, but from Central European ones.
650    _2
$a olše $x genetika $7 D029661
650    _2
$a Bayesova věta $7 D001499
650    _2
$a DNA chloroplastová $x genetika $7 D018742
650    _2
$a genetická variace $7 D014644
650    12
$a populační genetika $7 D005828
650    _2
$a haplotypy $7 D006239
650    _2
$a mikrosatelitní repetice $x genetika $7 D018895
650    _2
$a fylogeografie $7 D058974
650    _2
$a stromy $7 D014197
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Havrdová, Alena $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21, Praha 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Krak, Karol $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21, Praha 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Hadincová, Věroslava $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vít, Petr $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21, Praha 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Zákravský, Petr $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Douda, Jan $u Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21, Praha 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00007692 $t The New phytologist $x 1469-8137 $g Roč. 210, č. 4 (2016), s. 1395-407
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26831816 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180404 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180404142803 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1288787 $s 1008114
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2016 $b 210 $c 4 $d 1395-407 $e 20160201 $i 1469-8137 $m New phytologist $n New Phytol $x MED00007692
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180404

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace