-
Something wrong with this record ?
Evolution-guided adaptation of an adenylation domain substrate specificity to an unusual amino acid
S. Vobruba, S. Kadlcik, R. Gazak, J. Janata,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2006
Free Medical Journals
from 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
from 2006
PubMed Central
from 2006
Europe PubMed Central
from 2006
ProQuest Central
from 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-10-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2006
- MeSH
- Adenosine Monophosphate chemistry MeSH
- Amino Acids chemistry MeSH
- Models, Chemical MeSH
- Evolution, Chemical * MeSH
- Mutagenesis, Site-Directed MeSH
- Proteins chemistry genetics MeSH
- Substrate Specificity MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Adenylation domains CcbC and LmbC control the specific incorporation of amino acid precursors in the biosynthesis of lincosamide antibiotics celesticetin and lincomycin. Both proteins originate from a common L-proline-specific ancestor, but LmbC was evolutionary adapted to use an unusual substrate, (2S,4R)-4-propyl-proline (PPL). Using site-directed mutagenesis of the LmbC substrate binding pocket and an ATP-[32P]PPi exchange assay, three residues, G308, A207 and L246, were identified as crucial for the PPL activation, presumably forming together a channel of a proper size, shape and hydrophobicity to accommodate the propyl side chain of PPL. Subsequently, we experimentally simulated the molecular evolution leading from L-proline-specific substrate binding pocket to the PPL-specific LmbC. The mere change of three amino acid residues in originally strictly L-proline-specific CcbC switched its substrate specificity to prefer PPL and even synthetic alkyl-L-proline derivatives with prolonged side chain. This is the first time that such a comparative study provided an evidence of the evolutionary relevant adaptation of the adenylation domain substrate binding pocket to a new sterically different substrate by a few point mutations. The herein experimentally simulated rearrangement of the substrate binding pocket seems to be the general principle of the de novo genesis of adenylation domains' unusual substrate specificities. However, to keep the overall natural catalytic efficiency of the enzyme, a more comprehensive rearrangement of the whole protein would probably be employed within natural evolution process.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18016207
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180515104021.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180515s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0189684 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29240815
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Vobruba, Simon $u Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Evolution-guided adaptation of an adenylation domain substrate specificity to an unusual amino acid / $c S. Vobruba, S. Kadlcik, R. Gazak, J. Janata,
- 520 9_
- $a Adenylation domains CcbC and LmbC control the specific incorporation of amino acid precursors in the biosynthesis of lincosamide antibiotics celesticetin and lincomycin. Both proteins originate from a common L-proline-specific ancestor, but LmbC was evolutionary adapted to use an unusual substrate, (2S,4R)-4-propyl-proline (PPL). Using site-directed mutagenesis of the LmbC substrate binding pocket and an ATP-[32P]PPi exchange assay, three residues, G308, A207 and L246, were identified as crucial for the PPL activation, presumably forming together a channel of a proper size, shape and hydrophobicity to accommodate the propyl side chain of PPL. Subsequently, we experimentally simulated the molecular evolution leading from L-proline-specific substrate binding pocket to the PPL-specific LmbC. The mere change of three amino acid residues in originally strictly L-proline-specific CcbC switched its substrate specificity to prefer PPL and even synthetic alkyl-L-proline derivatives with prolonged side chain. This is the first time that such a comparative study provided an evidence of the evolutionary relevant adaptation of the adenylation domain substrate binding pocket to a new sterically different substrate by a few point mutations. The herein experimentally simulated rearrangement of the substrate binding pocket seems to be the general principle of the de novo genesis of adenylation domains' unusual substrate specificities. However, to keep the overall natural catalytic efficiency of the enzyme, a more comprehensive rearrangement of the whole protein would probably be employed within natural evolution process.
- 650 _2
- $a adenosinmonofosfát $x chemie $7 D000249
- 650 _2
- $a aminokyseliny $x chemie $7 D000596
- 650 12
- $a evoluce chemická $7 D019418
- 650 _2
- $a chemické modely $7 D008956
- 650 _2
- $a mutageneze cílená $7 D016297
- 650 _2
- $a proteiny $x chemie $x genetika $7 D011506
- 650 _2
- $a substrátová specifita $7 D013379
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kadlcik, Stanislav $u Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Gazak, Radek $u Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Janata, Jiri $u Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 12, č. 12 (2017), s. e0189684
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29240815 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180515 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180515104155 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1299831 $s 1013047
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 12 $c 12 $d e0189684 $e 20171214 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180515