• Something wrong with this record ?

Evolution-guided adaptation of an adenylation domain substrate specificity to an unusual amino acid

S. Vobruba, S. Kadlcik, R. Gazak, J. Janata,

. 2017 ; 12 (12) : e0189684. [pub] 20171214

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

Adenylation domains CcbC and LmbC control the specific incorporation of amino acid precursors in the biosynthesis of lincosamide antibiotics celesticetin and lincomycin. Both proteins originate from a common L-proline-specific ancestor, but LmbC was evolutionary adapted to use an unusual substrate, (2S,4R)-4-propyl-proline (PPL). Using site-directed mutagenesis of the LmbC substrate binding pocket and an ATP-[32P]PPi exchange assay, three residues, G308, A207 and L246, were identified as crucial for the PPL activation, presumably forming together a channel of a proper size, shape and hydrophobicity to accommodate the propyl side chain of PPL. Subsequently, we experimentally simulated the molecular evolution leading from L-proline-specific substrate binding pocket to the PPL-specific LmbC. The mere change of three amino acid residues in originally strictly L-proline-specific CcbC switched its substrate specificity to prefer PPL and even synthetic alkyl-L-proline derivatives with prolonged side chain. This is the first time that such a comparative study provided an evidence of the evolutionary relevant adaptation of the adenylation domain substrate binding pocket to a new sterically different substrate by a few point mutations. The herein experimentally simulated rearrangement of the substrate binding pocket seems to be the general principle of the de novo genesis of adenylation domains' unusual substrate specificities. However, to keep the overall natural catalytic efficiency of the enzyme, a more comprehensive rearrangement of the whole protein would probably be employed within natural evolution process.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18016207
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180515104021.0
007      
ta
008      
180515s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0189684 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29240815
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Vobruba, Simon $u Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Evolution-guided adaptation of an adenylation domain substrate specificity to an unusual amino acid / $c S. Vobruba, S. Kadlcik, R. Gazak, J. Janata,
520    9_
$a Adenylation domains CcbC and LmbC control the specific incorporation of amino acid precursors in the biosynthesis of lincosamide antibiotics celesticetin and lincomycin. Both proteins originate from a common L-proline-specific ancestor, but LmbC was evolutionary adapted to use an unusual substrate, (2S,4R)-4-propyl-proline (PPL). Using site-directed mutagenesis of the LmbC substrate binding pocket and an ATP-[32P]PPi exchange assay, three residues, G308, A207 and L246, were identified as crucial for the PPL activation, presumably forming together a channel of a proper size, shape and hydrophobicity to accommodate the propyl side chain of PPL. Subsequently, we experimentally simulated the molecular evolution leading from L-proline-specific substrate binding pocket to the PPL-specific LmbC. The mere change of three amino acid residues in originally strictly L-proline-specific CcbC switched its substrate specificity to prefer PPL and even synthetic alkyl-L-proline derivatives with prolonged side chain. This is the first time that such a comparative study provided an evidence of the evolutionary relevant adaptation of the adenylation domain substrate binding pocket to a new sterically different substrate by a few point mutations. The herein experimentally simulated rearrangement of the substrate binding pocket seems to be the general principle of the de novo genesis of adenylation domains' unusual substrate specificities. However, to keep the overall natural catalytic efficiency of the enzyme, a more comprehensive rearrangement of the whole protein would probably be employed within natural evolution process.
650    _2
$a adenosinmonofosfát $x chemie $7 D000249
650    _2
$a aminokyseliny $x chemie $7 D000596
650    12
$a evoluce chemická $7 D019418
650    _2
$a chemické modely $7 D008956
650    _2
$a mutageneze cílená $7 D016297
650    _2
$a proteiny $x chemie $x genetika $7 D011506
650    _2
$a substrátová specifita $7 D013379
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kadlcik, Stanislav $u Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Gazak, Radek $u Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Janata, Jiri $u Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 12, č. 12 (2017), s. e0189684
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29240815 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180515 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180515104155 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1299831 $s 1013047
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 12 $c 12 $d e0189684 $e 20171214 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180515

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...