Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Dealing with AFLP genotyping errors to reveal genetic structure in Plukenetia volubilis (Euphorbiaceae) in the Peruvian Amazon

J. Vašek, P. Hlásná Čepková, I. Viehmannová, M. Ocelák, D. Cachique Huansi, P. Vejl,

. 2017 ; 12 (9) : e0184259. [pub] 20170914

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

An analysis of the population structure and genetic diversity for any organism often depends on one or more molecular marker techniques. Nonetheless, these techniques are not absolutely reliable because of various sources of errors arising during the genotyping process. Thus, a complex analysis of genotyping error was carried out with the AFLP method in 169 samples of the oil seed plant Plukenetia volubilis L. from small isolated subpopulations in the Peruvian Amazon. Samples were collected in nine localities from the region of San Martin. Analysis was done in eight datasets with a genotyping error from 0 to 5%. Using eleven primer combinations, 102 to 275 markers were obtained according to the dataset. It was found that it is only possible to obtain the most reliable and robust results through a multiple-level filtering process. Genotyping error and software set up influence both the estimation of population structure and genetic diversity, where in our case population number (K) varied between 2-9 depending on the dataset and statistical method used. Surprisingly, discrepancies in K number were caused more by statistical approaches than by genotyping errors themselves. However, for estimation of genetic diversity, the degree of genotyping error was critical because descriptive parameters (He, FST, PLP 5%) varied substantially (by at least 25%). Due to low gene flow, P. volubilis mostly consists of small isolated subpopulations (ΦPT = 0.252-0.323) with some degree of admixture given by socio-economic connectivity among the sites; a direct link between the genetic and geographic distances was not confirmed. The study illustrates the successful application of AFLP to infer genetic structure in non-model plants.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18016351
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180515103854.0
007      
ta
008      
180515s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0184259 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28910307
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Vašek, Jakub $u Department of Genetics and Breeding, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Dealing with AFLP genotyping errors to reveal genetic structure in Plukenetia volubilis (Euphorbiaceae) in the Peruvian Amazon / $c J. Vašek, P. Hlásná Čepková, I. Viehmannová, M. Ocelák, D. Cachique Huansi, P. Vejl,
520    9_
$a An analysis of the population structure and genetic diversity for any organism often depends on one or more molecular marker techniques. Nonetheless, these techniques are not absolutely reliable because of various sources of errors arising during the genotyping process. Thus, a complex analysis of genotyping error was carried out with the AFLP method in 169 samples of the oil seed plant Plukenetia volubilis L. from small isolated subpopulations in the Peruvian Amazon. Samples were collected in nine localities from the region of San Martin. Analysis was done in eight datasets with a genotyping error from 0 to 5%. Using eleven primer combinations, 102 to 275 markers were obtained according to the dataset. It was found that it is only possible to obtain the most reliable and robust results through a multiple-level filtering process. Genotyping error and software set up influence both the estimation of population structure and genetic diversity, where in our case population number (K) varied between 2-9 depending on the dataset and statistical method used. Surprisingly, discrepancies in K number were caused more by statistical approaches than by genotyping errors themselves. However, for estimation of genetic diversity, the degree of genotyping error was critical because descriptive parameters (He, FST, PLP 5%) varied substantially (by at least 25%). Due to low gene flow, P. volubilis mostly consists of small isolated subpopulations (ΦPT = 0.252-0.323) with some degree of admixture given by socio-economic connectivity among the sites; a direct link between the genetic and geographic distances was not confirmed. The study illustrates the successful application of AFLP to infer genetic structure in non-model plants.
650    12
$a analýza polymorfismu délky amplifikovaných restrikčních fragmentů $7 D054458
650    _2
$a Euphorbiaceae $x genetika $7 D019665
650    12
$a genotypizační techniky $7 D060005
650    _2
$a Peru $7 D010568
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Hlásná Čepková, Petra $u Gene Bank, Division of Crop Genetics and Breeding, Crop Research Institute, Drnovská, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Viehmannová, Iva $u Department of Crop Sciences and Agroforestry, Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Ocelák, Martin $u Department of Crop Sciences and Agroforestry, Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Cachique Huansi, Danter $u Peruvian Amazon Research Institute, Tarapoto, Peru.
700    1_
$a Vejl, Pavel $u Department of Genetics and Breeding, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 12, č. 9 (2017), s. e0184259
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28910307 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180515 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180515104028 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1299975 $s 1013191
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 12 $c 9 $d e0184259 $e 20170914 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180515

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...