-
Something wrong with this record ?
Accuracy of VarioGuide Frameless Stereotactic System Against Frame-Based Stereotaxy: Prospective, Randomized, Single-Center Study
O. Bradac, A. Steklacova, K. Nebrenska, J. Vrana, P. de Lacy, V. Benes,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial
- MeSH
- Biopsy instrumentation MeSH
- Equipment Design MeSH
- Diagnosis, Differential MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted instrumentation MeSH
- Cohort Studies MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging instrumentation MeSH
- Brain pathology MeSH
- Brain Neoplasms pathology secondary surgery MeSH
- Neuronavigation instrumentation MeSH
- Observer Variation MeSH
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Sensitivity and Specificity MeSH
- Imaging, Three-Dimensional MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Frameless stereotactic brain biopsy systems are widely used today. VarioGuide (VG) is a relatively novel frameless system. Its accuracy was studied in a laboratory setting but has not yet been studied in the clinical setting. The purpose of this study was to determine its accuracy and diagnostic yield and to compare this with frame-based (FB) stereotaxy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Overall, 53 patients (33 males and 20 females, 60 ± 15 years old) were enrolled into this prospective, randomized, single-center study. Twenty-six patients were randomized into the FB group and 27 patients into the VG group. Real trajectory was pointed on intraoperative magnetic resonance. The distance of the targets and angle deviation between the planned and real trajectories were computed. The overall discomfort of the patient was subjectively assessed by the visual analog scale score. RESULTS: The median lesion volume was 5 mL (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-16 mL) (FB) and 16 mL (IQR: 2-27 mL) (VG), P = 0.133. The mean distance of the targets was 2.7 ± 1.1 mm (FB) and 2.9 ± 1.3 mm (VG), P = 0.456. Mean angle deviation was 2.6 ± 1.3 deg (FB) and 3.5 ± 2.1 deg (VG), P = 0.074. Diagnostic yield was 93% (25/27) in VG and 96% (25/26) in FB, P = 1.000. Mean operating time was 47 ± 26 minutes (FB) and 59 ± 31 minutes (VG), P = 0.140. One minor bleeding was encountered in the VG group. Overall patient discomfort was significantly higher in the FB group (visual analog scale score 2.5 ± 2.1 vs. 1.2 ± 0.6, P = 0,004). CONCLUSIONS: The VG system proved to be comparable in terms of the trajectory accuracy, rate of complications and diagnostic yield compared with the "gold standard" represented by the traditional FB stereotaxy for patients undergoing brain biopsy. VG is also better accepted by patients.
Department of Neuroradiology Military University Hospital Prague The Czech Republic
Department of Neurosurgery Royal Hallamshire Hospital Sheffield United Kingdom
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18016634
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180523093437.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180515s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.104 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28454992
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Bradac, Ondrej $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, The Czech Republic. Electronic address: ondrej.bradac@uvn.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Accuracy of VarioGuide Frameless Stereotactic System Against Frame-Based Stereotaxy: Prospective, Randomized, Single-Center Study / $c O. Bradac, A. Steklacova, K. Nebrenska, J. Vrana, P. de Lacy, V. Benes,
- 520 9_
- $a INTRODUCTION: Frameless stereotactic brain biopsy systems are widely used today. VarioGuide (VG) is a relatively novel frameless system. Its accuracy was studied in a laboratory setting but has not yet been studied in the clinical setting. The purpose of this study was to determine its accuracy and diagnostic yield and to compare this with frame-based (FB) stereotaxy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Overall, 53 patients (33 males and 20 females, 60 ± 15 years old) were enrolled into this prospective, randomized, single-center study. Twenty-six patients were randomized into the FB group and 27 patients into the VG group. Real trajectory was pointed on intraoperative magnetic resonance. The distance of the targets and angle deviation between the planned and real trajectories were computed. The overall discomfort of the patient was subjectively assessed by the visual analog scale score. RESULTS: The median lesion volume was 5 mL (interquartile range [IQR]: 2-16 mL) (FB) and 16 mL (IQR: 2-27 mL) (VG), P = 0.133. The mean distance of the targets was 2.7 ± 1.1 mm (FB) and 2.9 ± 1.3 mm (VG), P = 0.456. Mean angle deviation was 2.6 ± 1.3 deg (FB) and 3.5 ± 2.1 deg (VG), P = 0.074. Diagnostic yield was 93% (25/27) in VG and 96% (25/26) in FB, P = 1.000. Mean operating time was 47 ± 26 minutes (FB) and 59 ± 31 minutes (VG), P = 0.140. One minor bleeding was encountered in the VG group. Overall patient discomfort was significantly higher in the FB group (visual analog scale score 2.5 ± 2.1 vs. 1.2 ± 0.6, P = 0,004). CONCLUSIONS: The VG system proved to be comparable in terms of the trajectory accuracy, rate of complications and diagnostic yield compared with the "gold standard" represented by the traditional FB stereotaxy for patients undergoing brain biopsy. VG is also better accepted by patients.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a biopsie $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D001706
- 650 _2
- $a mozek $x patologie $7 D001921
- 650 _2
- $a nádory mozku $x patologie $x sekundární $x chirurgie $7 D001932
- 650 _2
- $a kohortové studie $7 D015331
- 650 _2
- $a diferenciální diagnóza $7 D003937
- 650 _2
- $a design vybavení $7 D004867
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a interpretace obrazu počítačem $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D007090
- 650 _2
- $a zobrazování trojrozměrné $7 D021621
- 650 _2
- $a magnetická rezonanční tomografie $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D008279
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a neuronavigace $x přístrojové vybavení $7 D038361
- 650 _2
- $a odchylka pozorovatele $7 D015588
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a počítačová rentgenová tomografie $7 D014057
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 700 1_
- $a Steklacova, Anna $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, The Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Nebrenska, Katerina $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, The Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Vrana, Jiri $u Department of Neuroradiology, Military University Hospital, Prague, The Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a de Lacy, Patricia $u Department of Neurosurgery, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
- 700 1_
- $a Benes, Vladimir $u Department of Neurosurgery and Neurooncology, Military University Hospital and First Medical Faculty, Charles University, Prague, The Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00167613 $t World neurosurgery $x 1878-8769 $g Roč. 104, č. - (2017), s. 831-840
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28454992 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180515 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180523093622 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1300258 $s 1013474
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 104 $c - $d 831-840 $e 20170425 $i 1878-8769 $m World neurosurgery $n World Neurosurg $x MED00167613
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180515
