Detail
Článek
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Handling and reporting of transperineal template prostate biopsy in Europe: a web-based survey by the European Network of Uropathology (ENUP)

SF. Kammerer-Jacquet, E. Compérat, L. Egevad, O. Hes, J. Oxley, M. Varma, G. Kristiansen, DM. Berney,

. 2018 ; 472 (4) : 599-604. [pub] 20180111

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18024393
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2003-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2011-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 2003-01-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2003-01-01 do Před 1 rokem

Transperineal template prostate biopsies (TTPB) are performed for assessments after unexpected negative transrectal ultrasound biopsies (TRUSB), correlation with imaging findings and during active surveillance. The impact of TTPBs on pathology has not been analysed. The European Network of Uropathology (ENUP) distributed a survey on TTPB, including how specimens were received, processed and analysed. Two hundred forty-four replies were received from 22 countries with TTPBs seen by 68.4% of the responders (n = 167). Biopsies were received in more than 12 pots in 35.2%. The number of cores embedded per cassette varied between 1 (39.5%) and 3 or more (39.5%). Three levels were cut in 48.3%, between 2 and 3 serial sections in 57.2% and unstained spare sections in 45.1%. No statistical difference was observed with TRUSB management. The number of positive cores was always reported and the majority gave extent per core (82.3%), per region (67.1%) and greatest involvement per core (69.4%). Total involvement in the whole series and continuous/discontinuous infiltrates were reported in 42.2 and 45.4%, respectively. The majority (79.4%) reported Gleason score in each site or core, and 59.6% gave an overall score. A minority (28.5%) provided a map or a diagram. For 19%, TTPB had adversely affected laboratory workload with only 27% managing to negotiate extra costs. Most laboratories process samples thoroughly and report TTPB similarly to TRUSB. Although TTPB have caused considerable extra work, it remains uncosted in most centres. Guidance is needed for workload impact and minimum standards of processing if TTPB work continues to increase.

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18024393
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180710095129.0
007      
ta
008      
180709s2018 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s00428-017-2265-1 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29327138
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Kammerer-Jacquet, Solene-Florence $u Barts Cancer University-Queen Mary University, Charterhouse square, EC1M, London, 6BQ, UK. jacquet.sf@gmail.com. Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Université de Rennes 1, Université Bretagne Loire, 35042, Rennes, France. jacquet.sf@gmail.com.
245    10
$a Handling and reporting of transperineal template prostate biopsy in Europe: a web-based survey by the European Network of Uropathology (ENUP) / $c SF. Kammerer-Jacquet, E. Compérat, L. Egevad, O. Hes, J. Oxley, M. Varma, G. Kristiansen, DM. Berney,
520    9_
$a Transperineal template prostate biopsies (TTPB) are performed for assessments after unexpected negative transrectal ultrasound biopsies (TRUSB), correlation with imaging findings and during active surveillance. The impact of TTPBs on pathology has not been analysed. The European Network of Uropathology (ENUP) distributed a survey on TTPB, including how specimens were received, processed and analysed. Two hundred forty-four replies were received from 22 countries with TTPBs seen by 68.4% of the responders (n = 167). Biopsies were received in more than 12 pots in 35.2%. The number of cores embedded per cassette varied between 1 (39.5%) and 3 or more (39.5%). Three levels were cut in 48.3%, between 2 and 3 serial sections in 57.2% and unstained spare sections in 45.1%. No statistical difference was observed with TRUSB management. The number of positive cores was always reported and the majority gave extent per core (82.3%), per region (67.1%) and greatest involvement per core (69.4%). Total involvement in the whole series and continuous/discontinuous infiltrates were reported in 42.2 and 45.4%, respectively. The majority (79.4%) reported Gleason score in each site or core, and 59.6% gave an overall score. A minority (28.5%) provided a map or a diagram. For 19%, TTPB had adversely affected laboratory workload with only 27% managing to negotiate extra costs. Most laboratories process samples thoroughly and report TTPB similarly to TRUSB. Although TTPB have caused considerable extra work, it remains uncosted in most centres. Guidance is needed for workload impact and minimum standards of processing if TTPB work continues to increase.
650    _2
$a biopsie $x metody $7 D001706
650    _2
$a Evropa $7 D005060
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a internet $7 D020407
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a nádory prostaty $x diagnóza $7 D011471
650    _2
$a výzkumný projekt $7 D012107
650    _2
$a odběr biologického vzorku $x metody $7 D013048
650    _2
$a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Compérat, Eva $u Hôpital Tenon, HUEP, AP-HP, Université la Sorbonne, Paris, France.
700    1_
$a Egevad, Lars $u Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Hes, Ondra $u Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Oxley, Jon $u North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
700    1_
$a Varma, Murali $u University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK.
700    1_
$a Kristiansen, Glen $u University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
700    1_
$a Berney, Daniel M $u Barts Cancer University-Queen Mary University, Charterhouse square, EC1M, London, 6BQ, UK.
773    0_
$w MED00004660 $t Virchows Archiv an international journal of pathology $x 1432-2307 $g Roč. 472, č. 4 (2018), s. 599-604
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29327138 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180710095418 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1316524 $s 1021314
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 472 $c 4 $d 599-604 $e 20180111 $i 1432-2307 $m Virchows Archiv $n Virchows Arch $x MED00004660
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180709

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...