• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Sorption of citalopram, irbesartan and fexofenadine in soils: Estimation of sorption coefficients from soil properties

A. Klement, R. Kodešová, M. Bauerová, O. Golovko, M. Kočárek, M. Fér, O. Koba, A. Nikodem, R. Grabic,

. 2018 ; 195 (-) : 615-623. [pub] 20171216

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18024409

The sorption of 3 pharmaceuticals, which may exist in 4 different forms depending on the solution pH (irbesartan in cationic, neutral and anionic, fexofenadine in cationic, zwitter-ionic and anionic, and citalopram cationic and neutral), in seven different soils was studied. The measured sorption isotherms were described by Freundlich equations, and the sorption coefficients, KF (for the fixed n exponent for each compound), were related to the soil properties to derive relationships for estimating the sorption coefficients from the soil properties (i.e., pedotransfer rules). The largest sorption was obtained for citalopram (average KF value for n = 1 was 1838 cm3 g-1) followed by fexofenadine (KF = 35.1 cm3/n μg1-1/n g-1, n = 1.19) and irbesartan (KF = 3.96 cm3/n μg1-1/n g-1, n = 1.10). The behavior of citalopram (CIT) in soils was different than the behaviors of irbesartan (IRB) and fexofenadine (FEX). Different trends were documented according to the correlation coefficients between the KF values for different compounds (RIRB,FEX = 0.895, p-value<0.01; RIRB,CIT = -0.835, p-value<0.05; RFEX,CIT = -0.759, p-value<0.05) and by the reverse relationships between the KF values and soil properties in the pedotransfer functions. While the KF value for citalopram was positively related to base cation saturation (BCS) or sorption complex saturation (SCS) and negatively correlated to the organic carbon content (Cox), the KF values of irbesartan and fexofenadine were negatively related to BCS, SCS or the clay content and positively related to Cox. The best estimates were obtained by combining BCS and Cox for citalopram (R2 = 93.4), SCS and Cox for irbesartan (R2 = 96.3), and clay content and Cox for fexofenadine (R2 = 82.9).

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18024409
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180716111757.0
007      
ta
008      
180709s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.098 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29287270
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Klement, Aleš $u Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Dept. of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic. Electronic address: klement@af.czu.cz.
245    10
$a Sorption of citalopram, irbesartan and fexofenadine in soils: Estimation of sorption coefficients from soil properties / $c A. Klement, R. Kodešová, M. Bauerová, O. Golovko, M. Kočárek, M. Fér, O. Koba, A. Nikodem, R. Grabic,
520    9_
$a The sorption of 3 pharmaceuticals, which may exist in 4 different forms depending on the solution pH (irbesartan in cationic, neutral and anionic, fexofenadine in cationic, zwitter-ionic and anionic, and citalopram cationic and neutral), in seven different soils was studied. The measured sorption isotherms were described by Freundlich equations, and the sorption coefficients, KF (for the fixed n exponent for each compound), were related to the soil properties to derive relationships for estimating the sorption coefficients from the soil properties (i.e., pedotransfer rules). The largest sorption was obtained for citalopram (average KF value for n = 1 was 1838 cm3 g-1) followed by fexofenadine (KF = 35.1 cm3/n μg1-1/n g-1, n = 1.19) and irbesartan (KF = 3.96 cm3/n μg1-1/n g-1, n = 1.10). The behavior of citalopram (CIT) in soils was different than the behaviors of irbesartan (IRB) and fexofenadine (FEX). Different trends were documented according to the correlation coefficients between the KF values for different compounds (RIRB,FEX = 0.895, p-value<0.01; RIRB,CIT = -0.835, p-value<0.05; RFEX,CIT = -0.759, p-value<0.05) and by the reverse relationships between the KF values and soil properties in the pedotransfer functions. While the KF value for citalopram was positively related to base cation saturation (BCS) or sorption complex saturation (SCS) and negatively correlated to the organic carbon content (Cox), the KF values of irbesartan and fexofenadine were negatively related to BCS, SCS or the clay content and positively related to Cox. The best estimates were obtained by combining BCS and Cox for citalopram (R2 = 93.4), SCS and Cox for irbesartan (R2 = 96.3), and clay content and Cox for fexofenadine (R2 = 82.9).
650    _2
$a adsorpce $x fyziologie $7 D000327
650    _2
$a zemědělství $7 D000383
650    _2
$a silikáty hliníku $x chemie $7 D000538
650    _2
$a bifenylové sloučeniny $x analýza $x metabolismus $7 D001713
650    _2
$a citalopram $x analýza $x metabolismus $7 D015283
650    _2
$a půda $x chemie $7 D012987
650    _2
$a látky znečišťující půdu $x analýza $x metabolismus $7 D012989
650    _2
$a terfenadin $x analogy a deriváty $x analýza $x metabolismus $7 D016593
650    _2
$a tetrazoly $x analýza $x metabolismus $7 D013777
650    _2
$a odpadní voda $x analýza $x chemie $7 D062065
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kodešová, Radka $u Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Dept. of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Bauerová, Martina $u Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Dept. of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Golovko, Oksana $u University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Zátiší 728/II, CZ-389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kočárek, Martin $u Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Dept. of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Fér, Miroslav $u Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Dept. of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Koba, Olga $u University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Zátiší 728/II, CZ-389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Nikodem, Antonín $u Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Dept. of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Grabic, Roman $u University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Zátiší 728/II, CZ-389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00002124 $t Chemosphere $x 1879-1298 $g Roč. 195, č. - (2018), s. 615-623
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29287270 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180716112055 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1316540 $s 1021330
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 195 $c - $d 615-623 $e 20171216 $i 1879-1298 $m Chemosphere $n Chemosphere $x MED00002124
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180709

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...