-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Sorption of citalopram, irbesartan and fexofenadine in soils: Estimation of sorption coefficients from soil properties
A. Klement, R. Kodešová, M. Bauerová, O. Golovko, M. Kočárek, M. Fér, O. Koba, A. Nikodem, R. Grabic,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- adsorpce fyziologie MeSH
- bifenylové sloučeniny analýza metabolismus MeSH
- citalopram analýza metabolismus MeSH
- látky znečišťující půdu analýza metabolismus MeSH
- odpadní voda analýza chemie MeSH
- půda chemie MeSH
- silikáty hliníku chemie MeSH
- terfenadin analogy a deriváty analýza metabolismus MeSH
- tetrazoly analýza metabolismus MeSH
- zemědělství MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The sorption of 3 pharmaceuticals, which may exist in 4 different forms depending on the solution pH (irbesartan in cationic, neutral and anionic, fexofenadine in cationic, zwitter-ionic and anionic, and citalopram cationic and neutral), in seven different soils was studied. The measured sorption isotherms were described by Freundlich equations, and the sorption coefficients, KF (for the fixed n exponent for each compound), were related to the soil properties to derive relationships for estimating the sorption coefficients from the soil properties (i.e., pedotransfer rules). The largest sorption was obtained for citalopram (average KF value for n = 1 was 1838 cm3 g-1) followed by fexofenadine (KF = 35.1 cm3/n μg1-1/n g-1, n = 1.19) and irbesartan (KF = 3.96 cm3/n μg1-1/n g-1, n = 1.10). The behavior of citalopram (CIT) in soils was different than the behaviors of irbesartan (IRB) and fexofenadine (FEX). Different trends were documented according to the correlation coefficients between the KF values for different compounds (RIRB,FEX = 0.895, p-value<0.01; RIRB,CIT = -0.835, p-value<0.05; RFEX,CIT = -0.759, p-value<0.05) and by the reverse relationships between the KF values and soil properties in the pedotransfer functions. While the KF value for citalopram was positively related to base cation saturation (BCS) or sorption complex saturation (SCS) and negatively correlated to the organic carbon content (Cox), the KF values of irbesartan and fexofenadine were negatively related to BCS, SCS or the clay content and positively related to Cox. The best estimates were obtained by combining BCS and Cox for citalopram (R2 = 93.4), SCS and Cox for irbesartan (R2 = 96.3), and clay content and Cox for fexofenadine (R2 = 82.9).
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18024409
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180716111757.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180709s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.12.098 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29287270
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Klement, Aleš $u Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Dept. of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic. Electronic address: klement@af.czu.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Sorption of citalopram, irbesartan and fexofenadine in soils: Estimation of sorption coefficients from soil properties / $c A. Klement, R. Kodešová, M. Bauerová, O. Golovko, M. Kočárek, M. Fér, O. Koba, A. Nikodem, R. Grabic,
- 520 9_
- $a The sorption of 3 pharmaceuticals, which may exist in 4 different forms depending on the solution pH (irbesartan in cationic, neutral and anionic, fexofenadine in cationic, zwitter-ionic and anionic, and citalopram cationic and neutral), in seven different soils was studied. The measured sorption isotherms were described by Freundlich equations, and the sorption coefficients, KF (for the fixed n exponent for each compound), were related to the soil properties to derive relationships for estimating the sorption coefficients from the soil properties (i.e., pedotransfer rules). The largest sorption was obtained for citalopram (average KF value for n = 1 was 1838 cm3 g-1) followed by fexofenadine (KF = 35.1 cm3/n μg1-1/n g-1, n = 1.19) and irbesartan (KF = 3.96 cm3/n μg1-1/n g-1, n = 1.10). The behavior of citalopram (CIT) in soils was different than the behaviors of irbesartan (IRB) and fexofenadine (FEX). Different trends were documented according to the correlation coefficients between the KF values for different compounds (RIRB,FEX = 0.895, p-value<0.01; RIRB,CIT = -0.835, p-value<0.05; RFEX,CIT = -0.759, p-value<0.05) and by the reverse relationships between the KF values and soil properties in the pedotransfer functions. While the KF value for citalopram was positively related to base cation saturation (BCS) or sorption complex saturation (SCS) and negatively correlated to the organic carbon content (Cox), the KF values of irbesartan and fexofenadine were negatively related to BCS, SCS or the clay content and positively related to Cox. The best estimates were obtained by combining BCS and Cox for citalopram (R2 = 93.4), SCS and Cox for irbesartan (R2 = 96.3), and clay content and Cox for fexofenadine (R2 = 82.9).
- 650 _2
- $a adsorpce $x fyziologie $7 D000327
- 650 _2
- $a zemědělství $7 D000383
- 650 _2
- $a silikáty hliníku $x chemie $7 D000538
- 650 _2
- $a bifenylové sloučeniny $x analýza $x metabolismus $7 D001713
- 650 _2
- $a citalopram $x analýza $x metabolismus $7 D015283
- 650 _2
- $a půda $x chemie $7 D012987
- 650 _2
- $a látky znečišťující půdu $x analýza $x metabolismus $7 D012989
- 650 _2
- $a terfenadin $x analogy a deriváty $x analýza $x metabolismus $7 D016593
- 650 _2
- $a tetrazoly $x analýza $x metabolismus $7 D013777
- 650 _2
- $a odpadní voda $x analýza $x chemie $7 D062065
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kodešová, Radka $u Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Dept. of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Bauerová, Martina $u Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Dept. of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Golovko, Oksana $u University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Zátiší 728/II, CZ-389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kočárek, Martin $u Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Dept. of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Fér, Miroslav $u Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Dept. of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Koba, Olga $u University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Zátiší 728/II, CZ-389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Nikodem, Antonín $u Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Dept. of Soil Science and Soil Protection, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 00 Prague 6, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Grabic, Roman $u University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Zátiší 728/II, CZ-389 25 Vodňany, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002124 $t Chemosphere $x 1879-1298 $g Roč. 195, č. - (2018), s. 615-623
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29287270 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180709 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180716112055 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1316540 $s 1021330
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 195 $c - $d 615-623 $e 20171216 $i 1879-1298 $m Chemosphere $n Chemosphere $x MED00002124
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180709