-
Something wrong with this record ?
The first cell-fate decision of mouse preimplantation embryo development: integrating cell position and polarity
AI. Mihajlović, AW. Bruce,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Review
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2011
Free Medical Journals
from 2011
Freely Accessible Science Journals
from 2011-09-01
PubMed Central
from 2011
Europe PubMed Central
from 2011
Open Access Digital Library
from 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2011-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2011
PubMed
29167310
DOI
10.1098/rsob.170210
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Models, Biological * MeSH
- Cell Lineage MeSH
- Embryo, Mammalian cytology physiology MeSH
- Embryonic Development physiology MeSH
- Cell Polarity * MeSH
- Signal Transduction MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Review MeSH
During the first cell-fate decision of mouse preimplantation embryo development, a population of outer-residing polar cells is segregated from a second population of inner apolar cells to form two distinct cell lineages: the trophectoderm and the inner cell mass (ICM), respectively. Historically, two models have been proposed to explain how the initial differences between these two cell populations originate and ultimately define them as the two stated early blastocyst stage cell lineages. The 'positional' model proposes that cells acquire distinct fates based on differences in their relative position within the developing embryo, while the 'polarity' model proposes that the differences driving the lineage segregation arise as a consequence of the differential inheritance of factors, which exhibit polarized subcellular localizations, upon asymmetric cell divisions. Although these two models have traditionally been considered separately, a growing body of evidence, collected over recent years, suggests the existence of a large degree of compatibility. Accordingly, the main aim of this review is to summarize the major historical and more contemporarily identified events that define the first cell-fate decision and to place them in the context of both the originally proposed positional and polarity models, thus highlighting their functional complementarity in describing distinct aspects of the developmental programme underpinning the first cell-fate decision in mouse embryogenesis.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18024471
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180718103823.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180709s2017 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1098/rsob.170210 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29167310
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Mihajlović, Aleksandar I $u Laboratory of Developmental Biology and Genetics (LDB&G), Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic aleksandar.mihajlovic00@gmail.com.
- 245 14
- $a The first cell-fate decision of mouse preimplantation embryo development: integrating cell position and polarity / $c AI. Mihajlović, AW. Bruce,
- 520 9_
- $a During the first cell-fate decision of mouse preimplantation embryo development, a population of outer-residing polar cells is segregated from a second population of inner apolar cells to form two distinct cell lineages: the trophectoderm and the inner cell mass (ICM), respectively. Historically, two models have been proposed to explain how the initial differences between these two cell populations originate and ultimately define them as the two stated early blastocyst stage cell lineages. The 'positional' model proposes that cells acquire distinct fates based on differences in their relative position within the developing embryo, while the 'polarity' model proposes that the differences driving the lineage segregation arise as a consequence of the differential inheritance of factors, which exhibit polarized subcellular localizations, upon asymmetric cell divisions. Although these two models have traditionally been considered separately, a growing body of evidence, collected over recent years, suggests the existence of a large degree of compatibility. Accordingly, the main aim of this review is to summarize the major historical and more contemporarily identified events that define the first cell-fate decision and to place them in the context of both the originally proposed positional and polarity models, thus highlighting their functional complementarity in describing distinct aspects of the developmental programme underpinning the first cell-fate decision in mouse embryogenesis.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a buněčný rodokmen $7 D019070
- 650 12
- $a polarita buněk $7 D016764
- 650 _2
- $a embryo savčí $x cytologie $x fyziologie $7 D004622
- 650 _2
- $a embryonální vývoj $x fyziologie $7 D047108
- 650 12
- $a biologické modely $7 D008954
- 650 _2
- $a signální transdukce $7 D015398
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a přehledy $7 D016454
- 700 1_
- $a Bruce, Alexander W $u Laboratory of Developmental Biology and Genetics (LDB&G), Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, Branišovská 31, 37005 České Budějovice, Czech Republic awbruce@prf.jcu.cz.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00190574 $t Open biology $x 2046-2441 $g Roč. 7, č. 11 (2017)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29167310 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180709 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180718104123 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1316602 $s 1021392
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 7 $c 11 $i 2046-2441 $m Open biology $n Open Biol $x MED00190574
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180709