• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Methods for automatic detection of artifacts in microelectrode recordings

E. Bakštein, T. Sieger, J. Wild, D. Novák, J. Schneider, P. Vostatek, D. Urgošík, R. Jech,

. 2017 ; 290 (-) : 39-51. [pub] 20170720

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18024807

BACKGROUND: Extracellular microelectrode recording (MER) is a prominent technique for studies of extracellular single-unit neuronal activity. In order to achieve robust results in more complex analysis pipelines, it is necessary to have high quality input data with a low amount of artifacts. We show that noise (mainly electromagnetic interference and motion artifacts) may affect more than 25% of the recording length in a clinical MER database. NEW METHOD: We present several methods for automatic detection of noise in MER signals, based on (i) unsupervised detection of stationary segments, (ii) large peaks in the power spectral density, and (iii) a classifier based on multiple time- and frequency-domain features. We evaluate the proposed methods on a manually annotated database of 5735 ten-second MER signals from 58 Parkinson's disease patients. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: The existing methods for artifact detection in single-channel MER that have been rigorously tested, are based on unsupervised change-point detection. We show on an extensive real MER database that the presented techniques are better suited for the task of artifact identification and achieve much better results. RESULTS: The best-performing classifiers (bagging and decision tree) achieved artifact classification accuracy of up to 89% on an unseen test set and outperformed the unsupervised techniques by 5-10%. This was close to the level of agreement among raters using manual annotation (93.5%). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the proposed methods are suitable for automatic MER denoising and may help in the efficient elimination of undesirable signal artifacts.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18024807
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180717100642.0
007      
ta
008      
180709s2017 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2017.07.012 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28735876
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Bakštein, Eduard $u Department of Cybernetics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic; National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic. Electronic address: eduard.bakstein@fel.cvut.cz.
245    10
$a Methods for automatic detection of artifacts in microelectrode recordings / $c E. Bakštein, T. Sieger, J. Wild, D. Novák, J. Schneider, P. Vostatek, D. Urgošík, R. Jech,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Extracellular microelectrode recording (MER) is a prominent technique for studies of extracellular single-unit neuronal activity. In order to achieve robust results in more complex analysis pipelines, it is necessary to have high quality input data with a low amount of artifacts. We show that noise (mainly electromagnetic interference and motion artifacts) may affect more than 25% of the recording length in a clinical MER database. NEW METHOD: We present several methods for automatic detection of noise in MER signals, based on (i) unsupervised detection of stationary segments, (ii) large peaks in the power spectral density, and (iii) a classifier based on multiple time- and frequency-domain features. We evaluate the proposed methods on a manually annotated database of 5735 ten-second MER signals from 58 Parkinson's disease patients. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS: The existing methods for artifact detection in single-channel MER that have been rigorously tested, are based on unsupervised change-point detection. We show on an extensive real MER database that the presented techniques are better suited for the task of artifact identification and achieve much better results. RESULTS: The best-performing classifiers (bagging and decision tree) achieved artifact classification accuracy of up to 89% on an unseen test set and outperformed the unsupervised techniques by 5-10%. This was close to the level of agreement among raters using manual annotation (93.5%). CONCLUSION: We conclude that the proposed methods are suitable for automatic MER denoising and may help in the efficient elimination of undesirable signal artifacts.
650    12
$a artefakty $7 D016477
650    _2
$a mozek $x cytologie $7 D001921
650    _2
$a evokované potenciály $x fyziologie $7 D005071
650    _2
$a Fourierova analýza $7 D005583
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mikroelektrody $x škodlivé účinky $7 D008839
650    _2
$a neurony $x fyziologie $7 D009474
650    _2
$a hluk $7 D009622
650    12
$a počítačové zpracování signálu $7 D012815
650    _2
$a support vector machine $7 D060388
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Sieger, Tomáš $u Department of Cybernetics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Wild, Jiří $u Department of Cybernetics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Novák, Daniel $u Department of Cybernetics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Schneider, Jakub $u Department of Cybernetics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic; National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vostatek, Pavel $u Department of Cybernetics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Urgošík, Dušan $u Department of Stereotactic Neurosurgery and Radiosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jech, Robert $u Department of Neurology and Center of Clinical Neuroscience, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00002841 $t Journal of neuroscience methods $x 1872-678X $g Roč. 290, č. - (2017), s. 39-51
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28735876 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180717100942 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1316938 $s 1021728
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 290 $c - $d 39-51 $e 20170720 $i 1872-678X $m Journal of neuroscience methods $n J Neurosci Methods $x MED00002841
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180709

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace