-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparison of glutathione levels measured using optimized monochlorobimane assay with those from ortho-phthalaldehyde assay in intact cells
J. Čapek, M. Hauschke, L. Brůčková, T. Roušar,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- biotest ekonomika metody MeSH
- buněčné linie MeSH
- cisplatina toxicita MeSH
- fluorescenční barviva chemie MeSH
- fluorescenční spektrometrie ekonomika metody MeSH
- glutathion analýza metabolismus MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- malonáty toxicita MeSH
- o-ftalaldehyd chemie MeSH
- průtoková cytometrie MeSH
- pyrazoly chemie MeSH
- senzitivita a specificita MeSH
- studie proveditelnosti MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Fluorometric glutathione assays have been generally preferred for their high specificity and sensitivity. An additional advantage offered by fluorescent bimane dyes is their ability to penetrate inside the cell. Their ability to react with glutathione within intact cells is frequently useful in flow cytometry and microscopy. Hence, the aims of our study were to use monochlorobimane for optimizing a spectrofluorometric glutathione assay in cells and then to compare that assay with the frequently used ortho-phthalaldehyde assay. We used glutathione-depleting agents (e.g., cisplatin and diethylmalonate) to induce cell impairment. For glutathione assessment, monochlorobimane (40μM) was added to cells and fluorescence was detected at 394/490nm. In addition to the regularly used calculation of glutathione levels from fluorescence change after 60min, we used an optimized calculation from the linear part of the fluorescence curve after 10min of measurement. We found that 10min treatment of cells with monochlorobimane is sufficient for evaluating cellular glutathione concentration and provides results entirely comparable with those from the standard ortho-phthalaldehyde assay. In contrast, the results obtained by the standardly used evaluation after 60min of monochlorobimane treatment provided higher glutathione values. We conclude that measuring glutathione using monochlorobimane with the here-described optimized evaluation of fluorescence signal could be a simple and useful method for routine and rapid assessment of glutathione within intact cells in large numbers of samples.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18024909
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180717100927.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180709s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.vascn.2017.06.001 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)28642085
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Čapek, Jan $u Department of Biological and Biochemical Sciences, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of glutathione levels measured using optimized monochlorobimane assay with those from ortho-phthalaldehyde assay in intact cells / $c J. Čapek, M. Hauschke, L. Brůčková, T. Roušar,
- 520 9_
- $a Fluorometric glutathione assays have been generally preferred for their high specificity and sensitivity. An additional advantage offered by fluorescent bimane dyes is their ability to penetrate inside the cell. Their ability to react with glutathione within intact cells is frequently useful in flow cytometry and microscopy. Hence, the aims of our study were to use monochlorobimane for optimizing a spectrofluorometric glutathione assay in cells and then to compare that assay with the frequently used ortho-phthalaldehyde assay. We used glutathione-depleting agents (e.g., cisplatin and diethylmalonate) to induce cell impairment. For glutathione assessment, monochlorobimane (40μM) was added to cells and fluorescence was detected at 394/490nm. In addition to the regularly used calculation of glutathione levels from fluorescence change after 60min, we used an optimized calculation from the linear part of the fluorescence curve after 10min of measurement. We found that 10min treatment of cells with monochlorobimane is sufficient for evaluating cellular glutathione concentration and provides results entirely comparable with those from the standard ortho-phthalaldehyde assay. In contrast, the results obtained by the standardly used evaluation after 60min of monochlorobimane treatment provided higher glutathione values. We conclude that measuring glutathione using monochlorobimane with the here-described optimized evaluation of fluorescence signal could be a simple and useful method for routine and rapid assessment of glutathione within intact cells in large numbers of samples.
- 650 _2
- $a biotest $x ekonomika $x metody $7 D001681
- 650 _2
- $a buněčné linie $7 D002460
- 650 _2
- $a cisplatina $x toxicita $7 D002945
- 650 _2
- $a studie proveditelnosti $7 D005240
- 650 _2
- $a průtoková cytometrie $7 D005434
- 650 _2
- $a fluorescenční barviva $x chemie $7 D005456
- 650 _2
- $a glutathion $x analýza $x metabolismus $7 D005978
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a malonáty $x toxicita $7 D008314
- 650 _2
- $a pyrazoly $x chemie $7 D011720
- 650 _2
- $a senzitivita a specificita $7 D012680
- 650 _2
- $a fluorescenční spektrometrie $x ekonomika $x metody $7 D013050
- 650 _2
- $a o-ftalaldehyd $x chemie $7 D009764
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Hauschke, Martina $u Department of Biological and Biochemical Sciences, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Brůčková, Lenka $u Department of Biological and Biochemical Sciences, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Roušar, Tomáš $u Department of Biological and Biochemical Sciences, Faculty of Chemical Technology, University of Pardubice, Pardubice, Czech Republic. Electronic address: Tomas.Rousar@upce.cz.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002898 $t Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods $x 1873-488X $g Roč. 88, č. Pt 1 (2017), s. 40-45
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28642085 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180709 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180717101224 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1317040 $s 1021830
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2017 $b 88 $c Pt 1 $d 40-45 $e 20170619 $i 1873-488X $m Journal of pharmacological and toxicological methods $n J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods $x MED00002898
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180709