• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Is the methanogenic community reflecting the methane emissions of river sediments?-comparison of two study sites

PP. Chaudhary, M. Rulík, M. Blaser,

. 2017 ; 6 (4) : . [pub] 20170316

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18025122

Studies on methanogenesis from freshwater sediments have so far primarily focused on lake sediments. To expand our knowledge on the community composition of methanogenic archaea in river sediments, we studied the abundance and diversity of methanogenic archaea at two localities along a vertical profile (top 50 cm) obtained from sediment samples from Sitka stream (the Czech Republic). In this study, we compare two sites which previously have been shown to have a 10-fold different methane emission. Archaeal and methanogen abundance were analyzed by real-time PCR and T-RFLP. Our results show that the absolute numbers for the methanogenic community (qPCR) are relatively stable along a vertical profile as well as for both study sites. This was also true for the archaeal community and for the three major methanogenic orders in our samples (Methanosarcinales, Methanomicrobiales, and Methanobacteriales). However, the underlying community structure (T-RFLP) reveals different community compositions of the methanogens for both locations as well as for different depth layers and over different sampling times. In general, our data confirm that Methanosarcinales together with Methanomicrobiales are the two dominant methanogenic orders in river sediments, while members of Methanobacteriales contribute a smaller community and Methanocellales are only rarely present in this sediment. Our results show that the previously observed 10-fold difference in methane emission of the two sites could not be explained by molecular methods alone.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18025122
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180718114843.0
007      
ta
008      
180709s2017 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/mbo3.454 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28303666
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Chaudhary, Prem Prashant $u Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
245    10
$a Is the methanogenic community reflecting the methane emissions of river sediments?-comparison of two study sites / $c PP. Chaudhary, M. Rulík, M. Blaser,
520    9_
$a Studies on methanogenesis from freshwater sediments have so far primarily focused on lake sediments. To expand our knowledge on the community composition of methanogenic archaea in river sediments, we studied the abundance and diversity of methanogenic archaea at two localities along a vertical profile (top 50 cm) obtained from sediment samples from Sitka stream (the Czech Republic). In this study, we compare two sites which previously have been shown to have a 10-fold different methane emission. Archaeal and methanogen abundance were analyzed by real-time PCR and T-RFLP. Our results show that the absolute numbers for the methanogenic community (qPCR) are relatively stable along a vertical profile as well as for both study sites. This was also true for the archaeal community and for the three major methanogenic orders in our samples (Methanosarcinales, Methanomicrobiales, and Methanobacteriales). However, the underlying community structure (T-RFLP) reveals different community compositions of the methanogens for both locations as well as for different depth layers and over different sampling times. In general, our data confirm that Methanosarcinales together with Methanomicrobiales are the two dominant methanogenic orders in river sediments, while members of Methanobacteriales contribute a smaller community and Methanocellales are only rarely present in this sediment. Our results show that the previously observed 10-fold difference in methane emission of the two sites could not be explained by molecular methods alone.
650    _2
$a Archaea $x klasifikace $x genetika $x metabolismus $7 D001105
650    12
$a biodiverzita $7 D044822
650    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
650    _2
$a DNA archebakterií $x genetika $7 D019641
650    _2
$a geologické sedimenty $x mikrobiologie $7 D019015
650    _2
$a methan $x metabolismus $7 D008697
650    _2
$a polymorfismus délky restrikčních fragmentů $7 D012150
650    _2
$a kvantitativní polymerázová řetězová reakce $7 D060888
650    _2
$a řeky $x mikrobiologie $7 D045483
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Rulík, Martin $u Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Science, Laboratory of Aquatic Microbial Ecology, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Blaser, Martin $u Department of Biogeochemistry, Max Planck Institute for Terrestrial Microbiology, Marburg, Germany.
773    0_
$w MED00184561 $t MicrobiologyOpen $x 2045-8827 $g Roč. 6, č. 4 (2017)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28303666 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180709 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180718115143 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1317253 $s 1022043
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 6 $c 4 $e 20170316 $i 2045-8827 $m MicrobiologyOpen $n Microbiologyopen $x MED00184561
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180709

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...