-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
The neuronal mechanisms underlying improvement of impulsivity in ADHD by theta/beta neurofeedback
A. Bluschke, F. Broschwitz, S. Kohl, V. Roessner, C. Beste,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2011
Free Medical Journals
od 2011
PubMed Central
od 2011
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011
ProQuest Central
od 2011-01-01 do 2019-12-31
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2011-01-01 do 2019-12-31
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2011
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
od 2011-12-01
Springer Nature - nature.com Journals - Fully Open Access
od 2011-12-01
PubMed
27514985
DOI
10.1038/srep31178
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- hyperkinetická porucha patologie psychologie MeSH
- impulzivní chování * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- neurofeedback * MeSH
- neurony patologie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Neurofeedback is increasingly recognized as an intervention to treat core symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Despite the large number of studies having been carried out to evaluate its effectiveness, it is widely elusive what neuronal mechanisms related to the core symptoms of ADHD are modulated by neurofeedback. 19 children with ADHD undergoing 8 weeks of theta/beta neurofeedback and 17 waiting list controls performed a Go/Nogo task in a pre-post design. We used neurophysiological measures combining high-density EEG recording with source localization analyses using sLORETA. Compared to the waiting list ADHD control group, impulsive behaviour measured was reduced after neurofeedback treatment. The effects of neurofeedback were very specific for situations requiring inhibitory control over responses. The neurophysiological data shows that processes of perceptual gating, attentional selection and resource allocation processes were not affected by neurofeedback. Rather, neurofeedback effects seem to be based on the modulation of response inhibition processes in medial frontal cortices. The study shows that specific neuronal mechanisms underlying impulsivity are modulated by theta/beta neurofeedback in ADHD. The applied neurofeedback protocol could be particularly suitable to address inhibitory control. The study validates assumed functional neuroanatomical target regions of an established neurofeedback protocol on a neurophysiological level.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18025330
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20180710093846.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 180709s2016 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/srep31178 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)27514985
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Bluschke, Annet $u Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden, Germany.
- 245 14
- $a The neuronal mechanisms underlying improvement of impulsivity in ADHD by theta/beta neurofeedback / $c A. Bluschke, F. Broschwitz, S. Kohl, V. Roessner, C. Beste,
- 520 9_
- $a Neurofeedback is increasingly recognized as an intervention to treat core symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Despite the large number of studies having been carried out to evaluate its effectiveness, it is widely elusive what neuronal mechanisms related to the core symptoms of ADHD are modulated by neurofeedback. 19 children with ADHD undergoing 8 weeks of theta/beta neurofeedback and 17 waiting list controls performed a Go/Nogo task in a pre-post design. We used neurophysiological measures combining high-density EEG recording with source localization analyses using sLORETA. Compared to the waiting list ADHD control group, impulsive behaviour measured was reduced after neurofeedback treatment. The effects of neurofeedback were very specific for situations requiring inhibitory control over responses. The neurophysiological data shows that processes of perceptual gating, attentional selection and resource allocation processes were not affected by neurofeedback. Rather, neurofeedback effects seem to be based on the modulation of response inhibition processes in medial frontal cortices. The study shows that specific neuronal mechanisms underlying impulsivity are modulated by theta/beta neurofeedback in ADHD. The applied neurofeedback protocol could be particularly suitable to address inhibitory control. The study validates assumed functional neuroanatomical target regions of an established neurofeedback protocol on a neurophysiological level.
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a hyperkinetická porucha $x patologie $x psychologie $7 D001289
- 650 _2
- $a dítě $7 D002648
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 12
- $a impulzivní chování $7 D007175
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 12
- $a neurofeedback $7 D058765
- 650 _2
- $a neurony $x patologie $7 D009474
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Broschwitz, Felicia $u Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Kohl, Simon $u Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Roessner, Veit $u Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Beste, Christian $u Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine of the TU Dresden, Germany. Experimental Neurobiology, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00182195 $t Scientific reports $x 2045-2322 $g Roč. 6, č. - (2016), s. 31178
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27514985 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180709 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20180710094135 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1317461 $s 1022251
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2016 $b 6 $c - $d 31178 $e 20160812 $i 2045-2322 $m Scientific reports $n Sci Rep $x MED00182195
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20180709