Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Methods of Candida dubliniensis identification and its occurrence in human clinical material

M. Mahelová, F. Růžička,

. 2017 ; 62 (5) : 401-408. [pub] 20170517

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18025574

Grantová podpora
NV16-31593A MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

Candida dubliniensis was reported as a new species in 1995. This species is often misidentified as Candida albicans. The aims of this work were to determine the occurrence of C. dubliniensis in various clinical materials, to evaluate several ways to identify it and to examine the genetic variability of isolates. Among 7706 isolates originally identified as C. albicans, 237 were identified as C. dubliniensis (3.1%). Most of the C. dubliniensis isolates were obtained from the upper and lower respiratory tract (61.4 and 22.9%). Five phenotypic methods including latex agglutination were used (cultivation on CHROMagar Candida, on Staib agar, at 42 °C and in medium with 6.5% NaCl), but only cultivation on the medium with an increased concentration of NaCl and latex agglutination gave reliable results. Species-specific polymerase chain reaction was used as the confirmation method. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry provided less reliable results. In fact, 78.9% of C. dubliniensis isolates had scores above 1.7. However, the rest of them (21.1%) were also identified as C. dubliniensis even when the scores were lower than 1.7. Divergences among C. dubliniensis strains were evaluated by means of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Eighty-six selected C. dubliniensis isolates showed a 69.6% level of similarity. The results of this study expand the knowledge of the incidence, means of identification and genotypic divergence of C. dubliniensis isolates.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18025574
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20180711114122.0
007      
ta
008      
180711s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s12223-017-0510-2 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28516267
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Mahelová, Martina $u Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University and St. Anne's Faculty Hospital, Pekařská 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Methods of Candida dubliniensis identification and its occurrence in human clinical material / $c M. Mahelová, F. Růžička,
520    9_
$a Candida dubliniensis was reported as a new species in 1995. This species is often misidentified as Candida albicans. The aims of this work were to determine the occurrence of C. dubliniensis in various clinical materials, to evaluate several ways to identify it and to examine the genetic variability of isolates. Among 7706 isolates originally identified as C. albicans, 237 were identified as C. dubliniensis (3.1%). Most of the C. dubliniensis isolates were obtained from the upper and lower respiratory tract (61.4 and 22.9%). Five phenotypic methods including latex agglutination were used (cultivation on CHROMagar Candida, on Staib agar, at 42 °C and in medium with 6.5% NaCl), but only cultivation on the medium with an increased concentration of NaCl and latex agglutination gave reliable results. Species-specific polymerase chain reaction was used as the confirmation method. Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry provided less reliable results. In fact, 78.9% of C. dubliniensis isolates had scores above 1.7. However, the rest of them (21.1%) were also identified as C. dubliniensis even when the scores were lower than 1.7. Divergences among C. dubliniensis strains were evaluated by means of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Eighty-six selected C. dubliniensis isolates showed a 69.6% level of similarity. The results of this study expand the knowledge of the incidence, means of identification and genotypic divergence of C. dubliniensis isolates.
650    _2
$a Candida $x klasifikace $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $x fyziologie $7 D002175
650    _2
$a kandidóza $x mikrobiologie $7 D002177
650    _2
$a pulzní gelová elektroforéza $7 D016521
650    _2
$a genetická variace $7 D014644
650    _2
$a genotyp $7 D005838
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a latex fixační testy $7 D007841
650    _2
$a mikrobiologické techniky $x metody $7 D008828
650    _2
$a polymerázová řetězová reakce $7 D016133
650    _2
$a chlorid sodný $x metabolismus $7 D012965
650    _2
$a spektrometrie hmotnostní - ionizace laserem za účasti matrice $7 D019032
650    _2
$a teplota $7 D013696
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Růžička, Filip $u Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine Masaryk University and St. Anne's Faculty Hospital, Pekařská 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic. ruzicka.filip@fnusa.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00011005 $t Folia microbiologica $x 1874-9356 $g Roč. 62, č. 5 (2017), s. 401-408
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28516267 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20180711 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20180711114414 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1317837 $s 1022496
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 62 $c 5 $d 401-408 $e 20170517 $i 1874-9356 $m Folia microbiologica $n Folia microbiol. (Prague) $x MED00011005
GRA    __
$a NV16-31593A $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20180711

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...