-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
A comparison of business rule management systems and standards for the implementation of clinical decision support systems using data from structured CDA documents
Peter Seifter, Stefan Sabutsch, Jeroen S. De Bruin
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
- MeSH
- elektronické zdravotní záznamy normy MeSH
- interoperabilita zdravotnických informací normy MeSH
- manažerské informační systémy MeSH
- software MeSH
- systémy pro podporu klinického rozhodování * normy MeSH
- zdravotnické informační systémy normy MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Rakousko MeSH
Background: Recently, the Austrian Patient Summary (APS) and Austrian Microbiology Report (AMR) document definitions were added to the Austrian national electronic health record repository. How to employ these standardized, structured patient data in clinical decision support (CDS) systems remains an interesting research subject. Objectives: To create a proof of concept for the emergency use of APS and AMR documents in a variety of CDS platforms and standards in an intensive care setting, in order to generate new insights by linking individual documents to different CDS approaches. Methods: APS and AMR definitions were stored using MongoDB, a document-oriented database system. For implementation of the clinical use case CDS, we selected the Drools business rule management system, as well as the ArdenSuite software for implementing the HL7 Arden Syntax for Medical Logic Systems standard. Results: Due to its manifold features, implementation of the CDS use case in Drools could be done quite efficiently without the need for additional coding of technical or algorithmic code, which results in smaller rules. In contrast, the use case implementations in Arden Syntax using the ArdenSuite required additional technical coding, distracting from the medical knowledge implementation. The Arden Syntax as a knowledge definition standard is, however, better understandable due to its resemblance to natural language compared to the Java-like definition language used in Drools. Conclusion: With the nation-wide availability of structured documents, the foundation for the implementation of clinical decision support systems has been laid. Commonly used open-source platforms offer extensive possibilities for the implementation of CDS systems. This evaluation of modern business rule management systems will advance the implementation of powerful clinical decision support solutions valuable to all stakeholders.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
Literatura
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18026527
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200331010848.0
- 007
- cr|cn|
- 008
- 180724s2018 xr a fs 000 0|eng||
- 009
- eAR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.24105/ejbi.2018.14.3.4 $2 doi
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Seifter, Peter $u Institute of eHealth, Department of Applied Computer Science, FH Joanneum University of Applied Computer Sciences GmbH, Graz, Austria; HL7 Austria, Austria
- 245 12
- $a A comparison of business rule management systems and standards for the implementation of clinical decision support systems using data from structured CDA documents / $c Peter Seifter, Stefan Sabutsch, Jeroen S. De Bruin
- 504 __
- $a Literatura
- 520 9_
- $a Background: Recently, the Austrian Patient Summary (APS) and Austrian Microbiology Report (AMR) document definitions were added to the Austrian national electronic health record repository. How to employ these standardized, structured patient data in clinical decision support (CDS) systems remains an interesting research subject. Objectives: To create a proof of concept for the emergency use of APS and AMR documents in a variety of CDS platforms and standards in an intensive care setting, in order to generate new insights by linking individual documents to different CDS approaches. Methods: APS and AMR definitions were stored using MongoDB, a document-oriented database system. For implementation of the clinical use case CDS, we selected the Drools business rule management system, as well as the ArdenSuite software for implementing the HL7 Arden Syntax for Medical Logic Systems standard. Results: Due to its manifold features, implementation of the CDS use case in Drools could be done quite efficiently without the need for additional coding of technical or algorithmic code, which results in smaller rules. In contrast, the use case implementations in Arden Syntax using the ArdenSuite required additional technical coding, distracting from the medical knowledge implementation. The Arden Syntax as a knowledge definition standard is, however, better understandable due to its resemblance to natural language compared to the Java-like definition language used in Drools. Conclusion: With the nation-wide availability of structured documents, the foundation for the implementation of clinical decision support systems has been laid. Commonly used open-source platforms offer extensive possibilities for the implementation of CDS systems. This evaluation of modern business rule management systems will advance the implementation of powerful clinical decision support solutions valuable to all stakeholders.
- 650 _2
- $a manažerské informační systémy $7 D008331
- 650 12
- $a systémy pro podporu klinického rozhodování $x normy $7 D020000
- 650 _2
- $a zdravotnické informační systémy $x normy $7 D063005
- 650 _2
- $a interoperabilita zdravotnických informací $x normy $7 D000073892
- 650 _2
- $a elektronické zdravotní záznamy $x normy $7 D057286
- 650 _2
- $a software $7 D012984
- 651 _2
- $a Rakousko $7 D001317
- 700 1_
- $a Sabutsch, Stefan $u HL7 Austria, Austria; ELGA GmbH, Austria
- 700 1_
- $a Bruin, Jeroen S. De $u Institute of eHealth, Department of Applied Computer Science, FH Joanneum University of Applied Computer Sciences GmbH, Graz, Austria; Section for Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 773 0_
- $t European journal for biomedical informatics $x 1801-5603 $g Roč. 14, č. 3 (2018), s. 21-31 $w MED00173462
- 856 41
- $u http://www.ejbi.org/ $y domovská stránka časopisu - plný text volně přístupný
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b online $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20180723130211 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200331011320 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1320748 $s 1023457
- BAS __
- $a 3 $a 4
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 14 $c 3 $d 21-31 $i 1801-5603 $m European Journal for Biomedical Informatics $n Eur. J. Biomed. Inform. (Praha) $x MED00173462
- LZP __
- $c NLK189 $d 20200331 $a NLK 2018-14/vt