Detail
Článek
Web zdroj
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

A comparison of business rule management systems and standards for the implementation of clinical decision support systems using data from structured CDA documents

Peter Seifter, Stefan Sabutsch, Jeroen S. De Bruin

. 2018 ; 14 (3) : 21-31.

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18026527

Background: Recently, the Austrian Patient Summary (APS) and Austrian Microbiology Report (AMR) document definitions were added to the Austrian national electronic health record repository. How to employ these standardized, structured patient data in clinical decision support (CDS) systems remains an interesting research subject. Objectives: To create a proof of concept for the emergency use of APS and AMR documents in a variety of CDS platforms and standards in an intensive care setting, in order to generate new insights by linking individual documents to different CDS approaches. Methods: APS and AMR definitions were stored using MongoDB, a document-oriented database system. For implementation of the clinical use case CDS, we selected the Drools business rule management system, as well as the ArdenSuite software for implementing the HL7 Arden Syntax for Medical Logic Systems standard. Results: Due to its manifold features, implementation of the CDS use case in Drools could be done quite efficiently without the need for additional coding of technical or algorithmic code, which results in smaller rules. In contrast, the use case implementations in Arden Syntax using the ArdenSuite required additional technical coding, distracting from the medical knowledge implementation. The Arden Syntax as a knowledge definition standard is, however, better understandable due to its resemblance to natural language compared to the Java-like definition language used in Drools. Conclusion: With the nation-wide availability of structured documents, the foundation for the implementation of clinical decision support systems has been laid. Commonly used open-source platforms offer extensive possibilities for the implementation of CDS systems. This evaluation of modern business rule management systems will advance the implementation of powerful clinical decision support solutions valuable to all stakeholders.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Bibliografie atd.

Literatura

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18026527
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200331010848.0
007      
cr|cn|
008      
180724s2018 xr a fs 000 0|eng||
009      
eAR
024    7_
$a 10.24105/ejbi.2018.14.3.4 $2 doi
040    __
$a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Seifter, Peter $u Institute of eHealth, Department of Applied Computer Science, FH Joanneum University of Applied Computer Sciences GmbH, Graz, Austria; HL7 Austria, Austria
245    12
$a A comparison of business rule management systems and standards for the implementation of clinical decision support systems using data from structured CDA documents / $c Peter Seifter, Stefan Sabutsch, Jeroen S. De Bruin
504    __
$a Literatura
520    9_
$a Background: Recently, the Austrian Patient Summary (APS) and Austrian Microbiology Report (AMR) document definitions were added to the Austrian national electronic health record repository. How to employ these standardized, structured patient data in clinical decision support (CDS) systems remains an interesting research subject. Objectives: To create a proof of concept for the emergency use of APS and AMR documents in a variety of CDS platforms and standards in an intensive care setting, in order to generate new insights by linking individual documents to different CDS approaches. Methods: APS and AMR definitions were stored using MongoDB, a document-oriented database system. For implementation of the clinical use case CDS, we selected the Drools business rule management system, as well as the ArdenSuite software for implementing the HL7 Arden Syntax for Medical Logic Systems standard. Results: Due to its manifold features, implementation of the CDS use case in Drools could be done quite efficiently without the need for additional coding of technical or algorithmic code, which results in smaller rules. In contrast, the use case implementations in Arden Syntax using the ArdenSuite required additional technical coding, distracting from the medical knowledge implementation. The Arden Syntax as a knowledge definition standard is, however, better understandable due to its resemblance to natural language compared to the Java-like definition language used in Drools. Conclusion: With the nation-wide availability of structured documents, the foundation for the implementation of clinical decision support systems has been laid. Commonly used open-source platforms offer extensive possibilities for the implementation of CDS systems. This evaluation of modern business rule management systems will advance the implementation of powerful clinical decision support solutions valuable to all stakeholders.
650    _2
$a manažerské informační systémy $7 D008331
650    12
$a systémy pro podporu klinického rozhodování $x normy $7 D020000
650    _2
$a zdravotnické informační systémy $x normy $7 D063005
650    _2
$a interoperabilita zdravotnických informací $x normy $7 D000073892
650    _2
$a elektronické zdravotní záznamy $x normy $7 D057286
650    _2
$a software $7 D012984
651    _2
$a Rakousko $7 D001317
700    1_
$a Sabutsch, Stefan $u HL7 Austria, Austria; ELGA GmbH, Austria
700    1_
$a Bruin, Jeroen S. De $u Institute of eHealth, Department of Applied Computer Science, FH Joanneum University of Applied Computer Sciences GmbH, Graz, Austria; Section for Artificial Intelligence and Decision Support, Center for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
773    0_
$t European journal for biomedical informatics $x 1801-5603 $g Roč. 14, č. 3 (2018), s. 21-31 $w MED00173462
856    41
$u http://www.ejbi.org/ $y domovská stránka časopisu - plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $b online $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20180723130211 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200331011320 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1320748 $s 1023457
BAS    __
$a 3 $a 4
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 14 $c 3 $d 21-31 $i 1801-5603 $m European Journal for Biomedical Informatics $n Eur. J. Biomed. Inform. (Praha) $x MED00173462
LZP    __
$c NLK189 $d 20200331 $a NLK 2018-14/vt

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace