-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Influence of no-tillage versus tillage system on common vole (Microtus arvalis) population density
M. Heroldová, R. Michalko, J. Suchomel, J. Zejda,
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
29193739
DOI
10.1002/ps.4809
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- Arvicolinae fyziologie MeSH
- biologické modely MeSH
- Brassica napus růst a vývoj MeSH
- hustota populace MeSH
- pěstování plodin metody MeSH
- pšenice růst a vývoj MeSH
- roční období MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
BACKGROUND: While the 'no-tillage' management system generally improves soil properties and helps to control arthropod pests, it may also intensify crop infestation by the common vole (Microtus arvalis Pallas). In this study, we evaluated the impact of soil management (no-tillage or tillage), crop and previous crop (winter wheat or winter rape), and season (spring or autumn) on common vole density using data from the Common Vole Monitoring Programme undertaken by the Plant Protection Service of the Czech Republic between 2000 and 2009. RESULTS: Models predicted low mean values of vole infestation across management types, crops, and seasons. The untilled fields hosted significantly more voles than the tilled fields in spring but not in autumn. More common voles were found in winter rape than in winter wheat during both seasons. CONCLUSION: Recent studies suggest that no-tillage management is more profitable than tillage management as a result of its positive impact on soil properties and pest control. During periods of high vole infestation, however, tillage may constitute an alternative strategy for reducing yield losses. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.
Department of Forest Ecology Mendel University in Brno Brno Czech Republic
Institute of Vertebrate Biology Czech Academy of Sciences Brno Czech Republic
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc18033502
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20181015114333.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 181008s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/ps.4809 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29193739
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Heroldová, Marta $u Department of Forest Ecology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Influence of no-tillage versus tillage system on common vole (Microtus arvalis) population density / $c M. Heroldová, R. Michalko, J. Suchomel, J. Zejda,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: While the 'no-tillage' management system generally improves soil properties and helps to control arthropod pests, it may also intensify crop infestation by the common vole (Microtus arvalis Pallas). In this study, we evaluated the impact of soil management (no-tillage or tillage), crop and previous crop (winter wheat or winter rape), and season (spring or autumn) on common vole density using data from the Common Vole Monitoring Programme undertaken by the Plant Protection Service of the Czech Republic between 2000 and 2009. RESULTS: Models predicted low mean values of vole infestation across management types, crops, and seasons. The untilled fields hosted significantly more voles than the tilled fields in spring but not in autumn. More common voles were found in winter rape than in winter wheat during both seasons. CONCLUSION: Recent studies suggest that no-tillage management is more profitable than tillage management as a result of its positive impact on soil properties and pest control. During periods of high vole infestation, however, tillage may constitute an alternative strategy for reducing yield losses. © 2017 Society of Chemical Industry.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a Arvicolinae $x fyziologie $7 D003411
- 650 _2
- $a Brassica napus $x růst a vývoj $7 D029688
- 650 _2
- $a pěstování plodin $x metody $7 D000069599
- 650 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 650 _2
- $a biologické modely $7 D008954
- 650 _2
- $a hustota populace $7 D011156
- 650 _2
- $a roční období $7 D012621
- 650 _2
- $a pšenice $x růst a vývoj $7 D014908
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Michalko, Radek $u Department of Forest Ecology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Suchomel, Josef $u Faculty of AgriSciences, Department of Zoology, Fisheries, Hydrobiology and Apiculture, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Zejda, Jan $u Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006028 $t Pest management science $x 1526-4998 $g Roč. 74, č. 6 (2018), s. 1346-1350
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29193739 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20181008 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20181015114829 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1340179 $s 1030496
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 74 $c 6 $d 1346-1350 $e 20180216 $i 1526-4998 $m Pest management science $n Pest manag. sci. (Print) $x MED00006028
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20181008
