• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Older Age and Longer Epilepsy Duration Do Not Predict Worse Seizure Reduction Outcome after Vagus Nerve Stimulation

J. Chrastina, J. Kocvarova, Z. Novak, I. Dolezalova, M. Svoboda, M. Brazdil,

. 2018 ; 79 (2) : 152-158. [pub] 20171127

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc18033518

INTRODUCTION:  We analyzed the results of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on older patients and patients with long-lasting epilepsy and included severely intellectually disabled patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  A total of 103 adults with VNS implanted from 2005 to 2014 were studied. The responder rates, that is, the percentage of VNS patients who responded to VNS, classified as seizure reduction ≥ 50% (50R) and seizure reduction ≥ 90% (90R), were compared in defined age groups (< 40 and ≥ 40 years, and < 50 and ≥ 50 years) and epilepsy duration groups (< 20 and ≥ 20 years, < 30 and ≥ 30 years, and < 40 and ≥ 40 years) at the 1-year follow-up visit and the last follow-up visit (at least 2 years after surgery). The age distributions and responder rates were also studied in patients with an intellectual disability. RESULTS:  The analysis did not confirm a significantly lower 50R or 90R rate in patients ≥ 40, ≥ 50, or ≥ 60 years when compared with their younger counterparts, but the 50R rate increase during follow-up care was the lowest in patients ≥ 50 and ≥ 60 years. The highest percentage of patients with an intellectual disability in the group < 40 years of age did not adversely affect the 50R rate. Longer epilepsy duration was not confirmed as a negative predictor of VNS outcome. There was a significantly higher 50R rate in patients with epilepsy duration ≥ 20 years (at the last follow-up visit) and a higher 90R rate in patients with epilepsy duration ≥ 30 years (at the 1-year follow-up visit). The increase in the 50R rate during follow-up care was lower in patients with epilepsy durations ≥ 30 and ≥ 40 years. CONCLUSIONS:  The study did not find worse VNS outcomes, as defined by the 50R or 90R rate, in older adult patients or in patients with a longer epilepsy duration. The increasing stimulation effect over time is less marked in older patients and in patients with longer epilepsy duration.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc18033518
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20181024145728.0
007      
ta
008      
181008s2018 gw f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1055/s-0037-1607396 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29179237
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a gw
100    1_
$a Chrastina, Jan $u Department of Neurosurgery, Masaryk University Medical Faculty, Faculty Hospital St. Anne's, Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Older Age and Longer Epilepsy Duration Do Not Predict Worse Seizure Reduction Outcome after Vagus Nerve Stimulation / $c J. Chrastina, J. Kocvarova, Z. Novak, I. Dolezalova, M. Svoboda, M. Brazdil,
520    9_
$a INTRODUCTION:  We analyzed the results of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) on older patients and patients with long-lasting epilepsy and included severely intellectually disabled patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS:  A total of 103 adults with VNS implanted from 2005 to 2014 were studied. The responder rates, that is, the percentage of VNS patients who responded to VNS, classified as seizure reduction ≥ 50% (50R) and seizure reduction ≥ 90% (90R), were compared in defined age groups (< 40 and ≥ 40 years, and < 50 and ≥ 50 years) and epilepsy duration groups (< 20 and ≥ 20 years, < 30 and ≥ 30 years, and < 40 and ≥ 40 years) at the 1-year follow-up visit and the last follow-up visit (at least 2 years after surgery). The age distributions and responder rates were also studied in patients with an intellectual disability. RESULTS:  The analysis did not confirm a significantly lower 50R or 90R rate in patients ≥ 40, ≥ 50, or ≥ 60 years when compared with their younger counterparts, but the 50R rate increase during follow-up care was the lowest in patients ≥ 50 and ≥ 60 years. The highest percentage of patients with an intellectual disability in the group < 40 years of age did not adversely affect the 50R rate. Longer epilepsy duration was not confirmed as a negative predictor of VNS outcome. There was a significantly higher 50R rate in patients with epilepsy duration ≥ 20 years (at the last follow-up visit) and a higher 90R rate in patients with epilepsy duration ≥ 30 years (at the 1-year follow-up visit). The increase in the 50R rate during follow-up care was lower in patients with epilepsy durations ≥ 30 and ≥ 40 years. CONCLUSIONS:  The study did not find worse VNS outcomes, as defined by the 50R or 90R rate, in older adult patients or in patients with a longer epilepsy duration. The increasing stimulation effect over time is less marked in older patients and in patients with longer epilepsy duration.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a věkové faktory $7 D000367
650    _2
$a epilepsie $x komplikace $x terapie $7 D004827
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a rizikové faktory $7 D012307
650    _2
$a časové faktory $7 D013997
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    12
$a vagová stimulace $7 D055536
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Kocvarova, Jitka $u First Department of Neurology, Faculty Hospital St. Anne's, Masaryk University Medical Faculty, St. Anne's Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Novak, Zdenek $u Department of Neurosurgery, Masaryk University Medical Faculty, Faculty Hospital St. Anne's, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Dolezalova, Irena $u First Department of Neurology, Faculty Hospital St. Anne's, Masaryk University Medical Faculty, St. Anne's Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Svoboda, Michal $u Institute of Biostatistics and Analyses, Medical Faculty Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Brazdil, Milan $u First Department of Neurology, Faculty Hospital St. Anne's, Masaryk University Medical Faculty, St. Anne's Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), Masaryk University, Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00179151 $t Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery $x 2193-6323 $g Roč. 79, č. 2 (2018), s. 152-158
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29179237 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20181008 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20181024150237 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1340189 $s 1030512
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 79 $c 2 $d 152-158 $e 20171127 $i 2193-6323 $m Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery $n J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg $x MED00179151
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20181008

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...