Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Use of EX-PRESS® implant in glaucoma surgery - retrospective study

Fialová V., Váša M.

Jazyk angličtina Země Česko

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19000027

Purpose: The objective of the study is to evaluate of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) with the use of EX-PRESS drainage implant. Evaluated was the decrease of intraocular pressure (IOP), visus stabilization, perimeter Humphrey - related finding (T 30-2), Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) and possibility of reducing the local drug therapy. Patients and methods: Retrospective data analysis was performed in 40 eyes with POAG in 28 subjects (14 female- and 14 male patients) average-aged 69.5 years. In all 40 eyes, surgery was performed by one surgeon within the years 2011-2017. Indications for EX-PRESS implantation in our study were the POAG with decompensated IOP, decompensated chronic secondary glaucoma or failure previously anti-glaucoma surgical operations. Within the preoperative period, in all cases the progression was observed on the perimeter T 30-2 or on the HRT. Before and after surgery, all 40 eyes were evaluated for the following factors: the IOP, visus, pachymetry, therapy by anti-glaucomatic drugs and regular inspections of the perimeter and HRT. The average post-surgery following-up time in our total of patients was 3 years and 8 months. The identified data of our total of patients were statistically processed using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. Results: The average pre-surgery IOP was 21.4 mm Hg, 6 months post-surgery 11.2 mm Hg, and 13.2 mm Hg at the last inspection. Pre-surgery anti-glaucoma therapy: monotherapy in 2 eyes, dual therapy in 25 eyes, triple therapy in 13 eyes. Post-operatively without the need of therapy were 19 eyes, the need for monotherapy in 7 eyes, dual therapy in 13-eyes and triple therapy in 1 eye. During the last inspection of the perimeter or HRT within the postoperative period, we identified stationary finding in 39 eyes and only a mild progression in 1 eye. Peroperatively, we have not identified any serious complications. Within the postoperative period, we observed choroid ablation in 10 eyes as recovered within 6-7 days. As a more serious complication, we noted endophthalmitis in 1 eye on the background of generalized lichen planus complicating skin disease. In 5 eyes within the late postoperative period we found occlusion of lateral orifices in the EX-PRESS implant by the fibrotic tissue, the 4 eyes developed cataracts, and the eyeball hypotonia persists in 1 eye at the level of 5 torr without affecting the visus of the operated eye. Conclusion: It outflows from the above results that the use of EX-PRESS implant in the surgery of glaucoma is an effective and safe method with a minimal number of complications.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19000027
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210601023019.0
007      
cr|cn|
008      
190104s2018 xr acd fs 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    0_
$a 10.31348/2018/1/2-1-2018 $2 doi
040    __
$a ABA008 $d ABA008 $e AACR2 $b cze
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Fialová, Veronika $7 xx0230999 $u Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Hradec Králové
245    10
$a Use of EX-PRESS® implant in glaucoma surgery - retrospective study / $c Fialová V., Váša M.
520    3_
$a Purpose: The objective of the study is to evaluate of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) with the use of EX-PRESS drainage implant. Evaluated was the decrease of intraocular pressure (IOP), visus stabilization, perimeter Humphrey - related finding (T 30-2), Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT) and possibility of reducing the local drug therapy. Patients and methods: Retrospective data analysis was performed in 40 eyes with POAG in 28 subjects (14 female- and 14 male patients) average-aged 69.5 years. In all 40 eyes, surgery was performed by one surgeon within the years 2011-2017. Indications for EX-PRESS implantation in our study were the POAG with decompensated IOP, decompensated chronic secondary glaucoma or failure previously anti-glaucoma surgical operations. Within the preoperative period, in all cases the progression was observed on the perimeter T 30-2 or on the HRT. Before and after surgery, all 40 eyes were evaluated for the following factors: the IOP, visus, pachymetry, therapy by anti-glaucomatic drugs and regular inspections of the perimeter and HRT. The average post-surgery following-up time in our total of patients was 3 years and 8 months. The identified data of our total of patients were statistically processed using the Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Test. Results: The average pre-surgery IOP was 21.4 mm Hg, 6 months post-surgery 11.2 mm Hg, and 13.2 mm Hg at the last inspection. Pre-surgery anti-glaucoma therapy: monotherapy in 2 eyes, dual therapy in 25 eyes, triple therapy in 13 eyes. Post-operatively without the need of therapy were 19 eyes, the need for monotherapy in 7 eyes, dual therapy in 13-eyes and triple therapy in 1 eye. During the last inspection of the perimeter or HRT within the postoperative period, we identified stationary finding in 39 eyes and only a mild progression in 1 eye. Peroperatively, we have not identified any serious complications. Within the postoperative period, we observed choroid ablation in 10 eyes as recovered within 6-7 days. As a more serious complication, we noted endophthalmitis in 1 eye on the background of generalized lichen planus complicating skin disease. In 5 eyes within the late postoperative period we found occlusion of lateral orifices in the EX-PRESS implant by the fibrotic tissue, the 4 eyes developed cataracts, and the eyeball hypotonia persists in 1 eye at the level of 5 torr without affecting the visus of the operated eye. Conclusion: It outflows from the above results that the use of EX-PRESS implant in the surgery of glaucoma is an effective and safe method with a minimal number of complications.
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a glaukom s otevřeným úhlem $x chirurgie $x terapie $7 D005902
650    12
$a filtrující operace $x metody $7 D018463
650    _2
$a drenážní implantáty glaukomové $7 D020327
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a glaukom $x chirurgie $x terapie $7 D005901
650    _2
$a oftalmologické chirurgické výkony $x metody $x přístrojové vybavení $x škodlivé účinky $7 D013508
650    _2
$a nitrooční tlak $7 D007429
650    _2
$a statistika jako téma $7 D013223
653    00
$a EX-PRESS implantát
700    1_
$a Váša, Martin. $7 xx0231013 $u VISUS spol. s. r. o., Náchod
773    0_
$t Czech and Slovak Ophthalmology $g Roč. 5, č. 1 (2018), s. 9-14 $w MED00194413
856    41
$u http://www.cs-ophthalmology.cz/en/journal/2018/1/2-1-2018 $y plný text volně přístupný
910    __
$a ABA008 $b online $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20190104132740 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210601023018 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1363056 $s 1038139
BAS    __
$a 3 $a 4
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 5 $c 1 $d 9-14 $m Czech and Slovak Ophthalmology $x MED00194413
LZP    __
$c NLK189 $d 20210531 $a NLK 2019-01/pk

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...