• Something wrong with this record ?

Evaluation of Effective Microorganisms on home scale organic waste composting

YV. Fan, CT. Lee, JJ. Klemeš, LS. Chua, MR. Sarmidi, CW. Leow,

. 2018 ; 216 (-) : 41-48. [pub] 20170417

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

Home composting can be an effective way to reduce the volume of municipal solid waste. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of Effective Microorganism™ (EM) for the home scale co-composting of food waste, rice bran and dried leaves. A general consensus is lacking regarding the efficiency of inoculation composting. Home scale composting was carried out with and without EM (control) to identify the roles of EM. The composting parameters for both trials showed a similar trend of changes during the decomposition. As assayed by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), the functional group of humic acid was initially dominated by aliphatic structure but was dominated by the aromatic in the final compost. The EM compost has a sharper peak of aromatic CC bond presenting a better degree of humification. Compost with EM achieved a slightly higher temperature at the early stage, with foul odour suppressed, enhanced humification process and a greater fat reduction (73%). No significant difference was found for the final composts inoculated with and without EM. The properties included pH (∼7), electric conductivity (∼2), carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (C: N < 14), colour (dark brown), odour (earthy smell), germination index (>100%), humic acid content (4.5-4.8%) and pathogen content (no Salmonella, <1000 Most Probable Number/g E. coli). All samples were well matured within 2 months. The potassium and phosphate contents in both cases were similar however the EM compost has a higher nitrogen content (+1.5%). The overall results suggested the positive effect provided by EM notably in odour control and humification.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19001271
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190108130257.0
007      
ta
008      
190107s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.019 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28427880
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Fan, Yee Van $u Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.
245    10
$a Evaluation of Effective Microorganisms on home scale organic waste composting / $c YV. Fan, CT. Lee, JJ. Klemeš, LS. Chua, MR. Sarmidi, CW. Leow,
520    9_
$a Home composting can be an effective way to reduce the volume of municipal solid waste. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of Effective Microorganism™ (EM) for the home scale co-composting of food waste, rice bran and dried leaves. A general consensus is lacking regarding the efficiency of inoculation composting. Home scale composting was carried out with and without EM (control) to identify the roles of EM. The composting parameters for both trials showed a similar trend of changes during the decomposition. As assayed by Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR), the functional group of humic acid was initially dominated by aliphatic structure but was dominated by the aromatic in the final compost. The EM compost has a sharper peak of aromatic CC bond presenting a better degree of humification. Compost with EM achieved a slightly higher temperature at the early stage, with foul odour suppressed, enhanced humification process and a greater fat reduction (73%). No significant difference was found for the final composts inoculated with and without EM. The properties included pH (∼7), electric conductivity (∼2), carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (C: N < 14), colour (dark brown), odour (earthy smell), germination index (>100%), humic acid content (4.5-4.8%) and pathogen content (no Salmonella, <1000 Most Probable Number/g E. coli). All samples were well matured within 2 months. The potassium and phosphate contents in both cases were similar however the EM compost has a higher nitrogen content (+1.5%). The overall results suggested the positive effect provided by EM notably in odour control and humification.
650    12
$a kompostování $7 D000076282
650    12
$a Escherichia coli $7 D004926
650    12
$a huminové látky $7 D006812
650    _2
$a půda $7 D012987
650    _2
$a tuhý odpad $7 D062611
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Lee, Chew Tin $u Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia; Low Carbon Asia Research Centre, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia; UTM Innovation Centre in Agritechnology for Advanced Bioprocessing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia. Electronic address: ctlee@utm.my.
700    1_
$a Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír $u Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory - SPIL, NETME Centre, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology - VUT Brno, Technická 2896/2, 616 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Chua, Lee Suan $u Institute of Bioproduct Development, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.
700    1_
$a Sarmidi, Mohamad Roji $u UTM Innovation Centre in Agritechnology for Advanced Bioprocessing, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia; Institute of Bioproduct Development, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.
700    1_
$a Leow, Chee Woh $u Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), 81310, UTM Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.
773    0_
$w MED00002657 $t Journal of environmental management $x 1095-8630 $g Roč. 216, č. - (2018), s. 41-48
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28427880 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190107 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190108130458 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1365159 $s 1039394
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 216 $c - $d 41-48 $e 20170417 $i 1095-8630 $m Journal of environmental management $n J Environ Manage $x MED00002657
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190107

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...