Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Vliv odlehčující ortézy na dynamické parametry stojné fáze chůze u pacientů s gonartrózou
[Effect of unloading knee brace on dynamic parameters of the stance phase of gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis]

M. Lehnertová, L. Siudová, M. Janura, Z. Svoboda, J. Gallo, P. Kamínek

. 2018 ; 85 (3) : 204-208.

Jazyk čeština Země Česko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19002862

Digitální knihovna NLK
Zdroj

E-zdroje Online

NLK Free Medical Journals od 2006

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Knee joint is the most common place where osteoarthritis may occur. A specific therapy is indicated to patients depending on the degree of disability and other signs. The available methods and their clinical value are regularly assessed in systematic reviews and meta-analysis of clinical studies. The evidence of working mechanism of the specific therapeutic intervention is another important part of evaluating its therapy effect. One of the possibilities of knee osteoarthritis conservative treatment is a functional prophylactic knee brace. This type of knee brace is designed to transfer the load away from the affected part of the knee joint in every step. The main goal of this study was to determine the effect of a prophylactic knee brace on dynamic parameters of the stance phase of gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis. MATERIAL AND METHODS The research involved twelve subjects with predominantly unilateral medial knee osteoarthritis of grade 2 and 3. Six patients did not complete the study. Therefore, the data of six persons were processed (average age 68.3 ± 4.4 years, average weight 83 ± 15.9 kg, average height 170.5 ± 11.7 cm). There were two piezoelectric Kistler 9286AA force plates used to determine the reaction forces. In total, six attempts were evaluated - three attempts with the knee brace and three attempts without it. Each subject completed three measurements. The first one took place at the beginning of the research, the second one after three months of using the brace, and the last one took place three months after the brace removal. The data processing methods were accustomed. At the beginning and at the end of the study the patients completed the WOMAC questionnaire and determined the level of their pain on the visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS The minimum value (p = 0.020) and the second maximum value (p = 0.035) of vertical reaction force significantly increased on the unaffected limb after a short-term application of a knee brace. There were significant increases found for walking without a brace in the maximum vertical force in the braking phase on the affected limb (p = 0.006) after three months of bracing, followed by similar results in the maximum vertical force in the braking (p = 0.001) as well as the propulsion (p = 0.035) phase on the unaffected side. Furthermore, we observed a significant extension in the overall duration of the stance phase of gait (p = 0.001) on the affected limb. According to the WOMAC and VAS results, three patients experienced subjective conditional improvement, two subjective deterioration and one participant remained unchanged. DISCUSSION The individualized solutions, i.e. their "adaptation" to a particular type of knee arthrosis in each patient, is the biggest problem in the treatment of knee arthrosis using a prophylactic brace. Our results confirm the usefulness of modern knee orthosis in terms of motion biomechanics. However, it still remains to be proved that it is possible to use the brace for a long time during the active time of the day and that this use brings about a significant relief from troubles, improving the patient's quality of life. CONCLUSIONS The effect of the orthosis application was reflected in force and time parameters of the vertical and anteroposterior component of the reaction force. The use of a prophylactic knee brace can influence the dynamics of gait. The short-term effect of prophylactic brace use is reflected in an increased load on the unaffected limb. From a long-term point of view, a prolongation of the stance phase in both extremities was observed. However, the positive effect of the knee brace use tended to persist even after the brace removal. There were no significant changes in the subjective assessment of pain, stiffness and function of the knee joint. Key words: osteoarthritis, knee joint, knee brace, walking, dynamic analysis, adduction moment.

Effect of unloading knee brace on dynamic parameters of the stance phase of gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19002862
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200520211229.0
007      
ta
008      
190116s2018 xr ad f 000 0|cze||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.55095/achot2018/033 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30257780
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Lehnertová, Michaela $7 xx0248031 $u Fakulta tělesné kultury, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci
245    10
$a Vliv odlehčující ortézy na dynamické parametry stojné fáze chůze u pacientů s gonartrózou / $c M. Lehnertová, L. Siudová, M. Janura, Z. Svoboda, J. Gallo, P. Kamínek
246    31
$a Effect of unloading knee brace on dynamic parameters of the stance phase of gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY Knee joint is the most common place where osteoarthritis may occur. A specific therapy is indicated to patients depending on the degree of disability and other signs. The available methods and their clinical value are regularly assessed in systematic reviews and meta-analysis of clinical studies. The evidence of working mechanism of the specific therapeutic intervention is another important part of evaluating its therapy effect. One of the possibilities of knee osteoarthritis conservative treatment is a functional prophylactic knee brace. This type of knee brace is designed to transfer the load away from the affected part of the knee joint in every step. The main goal of this study was to determine the effect of a prophylactic knee brace on dynamic parameters of the stance phase of gait in patients with knee osteoarthritis. MATERIAL AND METHODS The research involved twelve subjects with predominantly unilateral medial knee osteoarthritis of grade 2 and 3. Six patients did not complete the study. Therefore, the data of six persons were processed (average age 68.3 ± 4.4 years, average weight 83 ± 15.9 kg, average height 170.5 ± 11.7 cm). There were two piezoelectric Kistler 9286AA force plates used to determine the reaction forces. In total, six attempts were evaluated - three attempts with the knee brace and three attempts without it. Each subject completed three measurements. The first one took place at the beginning of the research, the second one after three months of using the brace, and the last one took place three months after the brace removal. The data processing methods were accustomed. At the beginning and at the end of the study the patients completed the WOMAC questionnaire and determined the level of their pain on the visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS The minimum value (p = 0.020) and the second maximum value (p = 0.035) of vertical reaction force significantly increased on the unaffected limb after a short-term application of a knee brace. There were significant increases found for walking without a brace in the maximum vertical force in the braking phase on the affected limb (p = 0.006) after three months of bracing, followed by similar results in the maximum vertical force in the braking (p = 0.001) as well as the propulsion (p = 0.035) phase on the unaffected side. Furthermore, we observed a significant extension in the overall duration of the stance phase of gait (p = 0.001) on the affected limb. According to the WOMAC and VAS results, three patients experienced subjective conditional improvement, two subjective deterioration and one participant remained unchanged. DISCUSSION The individualized solutions, i.e. their "adaptation" to a particular type of knee arthrosis in each patient, is the biggest problem in the treatment of knee arthrosis using a prophylactic brace. Our results confirm the usefulness of modern knee orthosis in terms of motion biomechanics. However, it still remains to be proved that it is possible to use the brace for a long time during the active time of the day and that this use brings about a significant relief from troubles, improving the patient's quality of life. CONCLUSIONS The effect of the orthosis application was reflected in force and time parameters of the vertical and anteroposterior component of the reaction force. The use of a prophylactic knee brace can influence the dynamics of gait. The short-term effect of prophylactic brace use is reflected in an increased load on the unaffected limb. From a long-term point of view, a prolongation of the stance phase in both extremities was observed. However, the positive effect of the knee brace use tended to persist even after the brace removal. There were no significant changes in the subjective assessment of pain, stiffness and function of the knee joint. Key words: osteoarthritis, knee joint, knee brace, walking, dynamic analysis, adduction moment.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a biomechanika $7 D001696
650    12
$a výztuhy $7 D001915
650    12
$a konzervativní terapie $x přístrojové vybavení $x metody $7 D000072700
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a chůze (způsob) $7 D005684
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a kolenní kloub $x patofyziologie $7 D007719
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a artróza kolenních kloubů $x patofyziologie $x psychologie $7 D020370
650    _2
$a měření bolesti $x metody $7 D010147
650    12
$a kvalita života $7 D011788
650    _2
$a rozsah kloubních pohybů $7 D016059
650    _2
$a chůze $7 D016138
650    _2
$a zatížení muskuloskeletálního systému $x fyziologie $7 D016474
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Siudová, L. $7 _AN099318 $u Lékařská fakulta, Ostravská univerzita v Ostravě
700    1_
$a Janura, Miroslav, $d 1957- $7 xx0001824 $u Fakulta tělesné kultury, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci
700    1_
$a Svoboda, Zdeněk $7 xx0098601 $u Fakulta tělesné kultury, Univerzita Palackého v Olomouci
700    1_
$a Gallo, Jiří $7 xx0019005 $u Ortopedická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc
700    1_
$a Kamínek, Petr $7 xx0019011 $u Ortopedická klinika, Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 85, č. 3 (2018), s. 204-208
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y 4 $z 0
990    __
$a 20190116 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200520211226 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1373932 $s 1041020
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 85 $c 3 $d 204-208 $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20190116

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...