-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Comparison of the efficiency of femtoLASIK and ReLEx SMILE in terms of dioptric error reduction
Z. Pavkova, J. Kacerovska, M. Kacerovsky
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2001
Free Medical Journals
od 1998
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2007-06-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2001
PubMed
29936526
DOI
10.5507/bp.2018.027
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- FemtoLASIK, ReLEx SMILE,
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kohortové studie MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- pooperační komplikace MeSH
- refrakční chirurgické výkony * metody MeSH
- refrakční vady terapie MeSH
- rohovka * chirurgie patologie MeSH
- zraková ostrost MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Refractive eye surgery is a rapidly expanding field of ophthalmology and corneal surgery is undergoing constant development leading to less invasive technologies. The goal of this study was to compare the most common femtoLASIK surgery with the newer ReLEx SMILE surgery which is gentler to the cornea. The comparison was made in terms of dioptric error reduction. METHODS: The studied cohort of patients consisted of two major groups: 30 patients who underwent femtoLASIK surgery and 30 who underwent ReLEx SMILE surgery. -30 patients, 60 eyes. All patients were aged 18-45 years with moderate myopia or astigmatism ranging from -3.25 to -6.0 spherical diopters and from 0 to -1.0 cylindrical diopters. In all, the best corrected visual acuity measured prior to surgery was 1.0. Pachymetry was not comparable because each surgical method was performed at a different time point and the introduction of an innovative method into practice led to a change in selection criteria. RESULTS: During postsurgical check-ups, the ReLEx SMILE method (0.74) led to lower values of non-corrected visual acuity compared to the femtoLASIK method (0.88), (P<0.001). However, the results changed at the one-year post-surgery check-up, when ReLEX SMILE patients achieved non-corrected visual acuity of 0.97 compared to femtoLASIK patients, who scored 0.83, (P=0.007). Based on data analysis from the automatic refractometer, the average spherical diopters of the femtoLASIK (-0.32 D) were higher than those of the ReLEx SMILE (-0.07 D), (P<0.001). The results for the cylindrical diopters were also significant, (P=0.021). When we compared the spherical equivalent one year after surgery, the difference between methods was significant. The FemtoLASIK method resulted in an average SE -0.55 D compared to -0.09 D for the ReLEx SMILE method, (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that there was a significant difference in results between the two surgical methods of treatment of moderate myopia and astigmatism, in terms of regression of dioptric error, as well as in achievement and maintenance of visual acuity during the observed period. The ReLEx SMILE had better results.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19011724
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20230316094852.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190404s2018 xr d f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.5507/bp.2018.027 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29936526
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Pavkova, Zuzana $u The Horni Pocernice Eye Clinic, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Comparison of the efficiency of femtoLASIK and ReLEx SMILE in terms of dioptric error reduction / $c Z. Pavkova, J. Kacerovska, M. Kacerovsky
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Refractive eye surgery is a rapidly expanding field of ophthalmology and corneal surgery is undergoing constant development leading to less invasive technologies. The goal of this study was to compare the most common femtoLASIK surgery with the newer ReLEx SMILE surgery which is gentler to the cornea. The comparison was made in terms of dioptric error reduction. METHODS: The studied cohort of patients consisted of two major groups: 30 patients who underwent femtoLASIK surgery and 30 who underwent ReLEx SMILE surgery. -30 patients, 60 eyes. All patients were aged 18-45 years with moderate myopia or astigmatism ranging from -3.25 to -6.0 spherical diopters and from 0 to -1.0 cylindrical diopters. In all, the best corrected visual acuity measured prior to surgery was 1.0. Pachymetry was not comparable because each surgical method was performed at a different time point and the introduction of an innovative method into practice led to a change in selection criteria. RESULTS: During postsurgical check-ups, the ReLEx SMILE method (0.74) led to lower values of non-corrected visual acuity compared to the femtoLASIK method (0.88), (P<0.001). However, the results changed at the one-year post-surgery check-up, when ReLEX SMILE patients achieved non-corrected visual acuity of 0.97 compared to femtoLASIK patients, who scored 0.83, (P=0.007). Based on data analysis from the automatic refractometer, the average spherical diopters of the femtoLASIK (-0.32 D) were higher than those of the ReLEx SMILE (-0.07 D), (P<0.001). The results for the cylindrical diopters were also significant, (P=0.021). When we compared the spherical equivalent one year after surgery, the difference between methods was significant. The FemtoLASIK method resulted in an average SE -0.55 D compared to -0.09 D for the ReLEx SMILE method, (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This study showed that there was a significant difference in results between the two surgical methods of treatment of moderate myopia and astigmatism, in terms of regression of dioptric error, as well as in achievement and maintenance of visual acuity during the observed period. The ReLEx SMILE had better results.
- 650 17
- $a rohovka $x chirurgie $x patologie $7 D003315 $2 czmesh
- 650 17
- $a refrakční chirurgické výkony $x metody $7 D054140 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a refrakční vady $x terapie $7 D012030 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a zraková ostrost $7 D014792 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a pooperační komplikace $7 D011183 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a kohortové studie $7 D015331 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a dospělí $7 D000328 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a lidé $7 D006801 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a mladiství $7 D000293 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297 $2 czmesh
- 650 _7
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260 $2 czmesh
- 653 00
- $a FemtoLASIK
- 653 00
- $a ReLEx SMILE
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Kacerovská, Jana $u The Horni Pocernice Eye Clinic, Prague, Czech Republic. $7 xx0227530
- 700 1_
- $a Kacerovský, Martin, $u The Horni Pocernice Eye Clinic, Prague, Czech Republic. $d 1968- $7 mzk2009502318
- 773 0_
- $w MED00012606 $t Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $x 1213-8118 $g Roč. 162, č. 4 (2018), s. 329-334
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29936526 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 1502 $c 958 $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190404 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20230316094847 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1390871 $s 1050029
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 162 $c 4 $d 329-334 $e 20180607 $i 1213-8118 $m Biomedical papers of the Medical Faculty of the University Palacký, Olomouc Czech Republic $n Biomed. Pap. Fac. Med. Palacký Univ. Olomouc Czech Repub. (Print) $x MED00012606
- LZP __
- $c NLK182 $d 20230316 $b NLK198 $a Pubmed-20190404