• Something wrong with this record ?

Comparing the removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil after different bioremediation approaches in relationto the extracellular enzyme activities

Z. Košnář, T. Částková, L. Wiesnerová, L. Praus, I. Jablonský, M. Koudela, P. Tlustoš,

. 2019 ; 76 (-) : 249-258. [pub] 20180518

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article

A 120-day experiment was conducted to compare the removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from agricultural soil after natural attenuation (NA), phytoremediation (P), mycoremediation (M), and plant-assisted mycoremediation (PAM) approaches in relation to the extracellular enzyme activities in soil. The NA treatment removed the total soil PAH content negligibly. The P treatment using maize (Zea mays) enhanced only the removal of low and medium molecular PAHs. The Pleurotus ostreatus cultivated on 30-50 mm wood chip substrate used in M treatment was the most successful in the removal of majority PAHs. Therefore, significantly (p < 0.05) highest total PAH removal by 541.4 μg/kg dw (dry weight) (36%) from all tested M treatments was observed. When using the same fungal substrate together with maize in PAM treatment, the total PAH removal was not statistically different from the previous M treatment. However, the maize-assisted mycoremediation treatment significantly boosted fungal biomass, microbial and manganese peroxidase activity in soil which strongly correlated with the removal of total PAHs. The higher PAH removal in that PAM treatment could be reflected in the following post-harvest time. Our suggested M and PAM approaches could be promising in situ bioremediation strategies for PAH-contaminated soils.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19012068
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190415132059.0
007      
ta
008      
190405s2019 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jes.2018.05.007 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30528015
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Košnář, Zdeněk $u Department of Agroenvironmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic. Electronic address: kosnarz@af.czu.cz.
245    10
$a Comparing the removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil after different bioremediation approaches in relationto the extracellular enzyme activities / $c Z. Košnář, T. Částková, L. Wiesnerová, L. Praus, I. Jablonský, M. Koudela, P. Tlustoš,
520    9_
$a A 120-day experiment was conducted to compare the removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from agricultural soil after natural attenuation (NA), phytoremediation (P), mycoremediation (M), and plant-assisted mycoremediation (PAM) approaches in relation to the extracellular enzyme activities in soil. The NA treatment removed the total soil PAH content negligibly. The P treatment using maize (Zea mays) enhanced only the removal of low and medium molecular PAHs. The Pleurotus ostreatus cultivated on 30-50 mm wood chip substrate used in M treatment was the most successful in the removal of majority PAHs. Therefore, significantly (p < 0.05) highest total PAH removal by 541.4 μg/kg dw (dry weight) (36%) from all tested M treatments was observed. When using the same fungal substrate together with maize in PAM treatment, the total PAH removal was not statistically different from the previous M treatment. However, the maize-assisted mycoremediation treatment significantly boosted fungal biomass, microbial and manganese peroxidase activity in soil which strongly correlated with the removal of total PAHs. The higher PAH removal in that PAM treatment could be reflected in the following post-harvest time. Our suggested M and PAM approaches could be promising in situ bioremediation strategies for PAH-contaminated soils.
650    _2
$a biodegradace $7 D001673
650    _2
$a biomasa $7 D018533
650    _2
$a extracelulární prostor $x enzymologie $7 D005110
650    _2
$a peroxidasy $x metabolismus $7 D010544
650    _2
$a Pleurotus $x cytologie $x metabolismus $7 D020076
650    _2
$a polycyklické aromatické uhlovodíky $x izolace a purifikace $x metabolismus $7 D011084
650    _2
$a půda $x chemie $7 D012987
650    _2
$a látky znečišťující půdu $x izolace a purifikace $x metabolismus $7 D012989
650    _2
$a kukuřice setá $x cytologie $x metabolismus $7 D003313
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Částková, Tereza $u Department of Agroenvironmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Wiesnerová, Lucie $u Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Praus, Lukáš $u Department of Agroenvironmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jablonský, Ivan $u Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Koudela, Martin $u Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Tlustoš, Pavel $u Department of Agroenvironmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00181722 $t Journal of environmental sciences (China) $x 1001-0742 $g Roč. 76, č. - (2019), s. 249-258
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30528015 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190405 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190415132122 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1391378 $s 1050373
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 76 $c - $d 249-258 $e 20180518 $i 1001-0742 $m Journal of environmental sciences (China) $n J Environ Sci (China) $x MED00181722
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190405

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...