-
Something wrong with this record ?
Comparing the removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil after different bioremediation approaches in relationto the extracellular enzyme activities
Z. Košnář, T. Částková, L. Wiesnerová, L. Praus, I. Jablonský, M. Koudela, P. Tlustoš,
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article
- MeSH
- Biodegradation, Environmental MeSH
- Biomass MeSH
- Extracellular Space enzymology MeSH
- Zea mays cytology metabolism MeSH
- Soil Pollutants isolation & purification metabolism MeSH
- Peroxidases metabolism MeSH
- Pleurotus cytology metabolism MeSH
- Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons isolation & purification metabolism MeSH
- Soil chemistry MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
A 120-day experiment was conducted to compare the removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from agricultural soil after natural attenuation (NA), phytoremediation (P), mycoremediation (M), and plant-assisted mycoremediation (PAM) approaches in relation to the extracellular enzyme activities in soil. The NA treatment removed the total soil PAH content negligibly. The P treatment using maize (Zea mays) enhanced only the removal of low and medium molecular PAHs. The Pleurotus ostreatus cultivated on 30-50 mm wood chip substrate used in M treatment was the most successful in the removal of majority PAHs. Therefore, significantly (p < 0.05) highest total PAH removal by 541.4 μg/kg dw (dry weight) (36%) from all tested M treatments was observed. When using the same fungal substrate together with maize in PAM treatment, the total PAH removal was not statistically different from the previous M treatment. However, the maize-assisted mycoremediation treatment significantly boosted fungal biomass, microbial and manganese peroxidase activity in soil which strongly correlated with the removal of total PAHs. The higher PAH removal in that PAM treatment could be reflected in the following post-harvest time. Our suggested M and PAM approaches could be promising in situ bioremediation strategies for PAH-contaminated soils.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19012068
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190415132059.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190405s2019 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jes.2018.05.007 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30528015
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Košnář, Zdeněk $u Department of Agroenvironmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic. Electronic address: kosnarz@af.czu.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Comparing the removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil after different bioremediation approaches in relationto the extracellular enzyme activities / $c Z. Košnář, T. Částková, L. Wiesnerová, L. Praus, I. Jablonský, M. Koudela, P. Tlustoš,
- 520 9_
- $a A 120-day experiment was conducted to compare the removal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from agricultural soil after natural attenuation (NA), phytoremediation (P), mycoremediation (M), and plant-assisted mycoremediation (PAM) approaches in relation to the extracellular enzyme activities in soil. The NA treatment removed the total soil PAH content negligibly. The P treatment using maize (Zea mays) enhanced only the removal of low and medium molecular PAHs. The Pleurotus ostreatus cultivated on 30-50 mm wood chip substrate used in M treatment was the most successful in the removal of majority PAHs. Therefore, significantly (p < 0.05) highest total PAH removal by 541.4 μg/kg dw (dry weight) (36%) from all tested M treatments was observed. When using the same fungal substrate together with maize in PAM treatment, the total PAH removal was not statistically different from the previous M treatment. However, the maize-assisted mycoremediation treatment significantly boosted fungal biomass, microbial and manganese peroxidase activity in soil which strongly correlated with the removal of total PAHs. The higher PAH removal in that PAM treatment could be reflected in the following post-harvest time. Our suggested M and PAM approaches could be promising in situ bioremediation strategies for PAH-contaminated soils.
- 650 _2
- $a biodegradace $7 D001673
- 650 _2
- $a biomasa $7 D018533
- 650 _2
- $a extracelulární prostor $x enzymologie $7 D005110
- 650 _2
- $a peroxidasy $x metabolismus $7 D010544
- 650 _2
- $a Pleurotus $x cytologie $x metabolismus $7 D020076
- 650 _2
- $a polycyklické aromatické uhlovodíky $x izolace a purifikace $x metabolismus $7 D011084
- 650 _2
- $a půda $x chemie $7 D012987
- 650 _2
- $a látky znečišťující půdu $x izolace a purifikace $x metabolismus $7 D012989
- 650 _2
- $a kukuřice setá $x cytologie $x metabolismus $7 D003313
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Částková, Tereza $u Department of Agroenvironmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Wiesnerová, Lucie $u Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Praus, Lukáš $u Department of Agroenvironmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Jablonský, Ivan $u Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Koudela, Martin $u Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Tlustoš, Pavel $u Department of Agroenvironmental Chemistry and Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00 Prague 6 - Suchdol, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00181722 $t Journal of environmental sciences (China) $x 1001-0742 $g Roč. 76, č. - (2019), s. 249-258
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30528015 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190415132122 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1391378 $s 1050373
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 76 $c - $d 249-258 $e 20180518 $i 1001-0742 $m Journal of environmental sciences (China) $n J Environ Sci (China) $x MED00181722
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190405