• Something wrong with this record ?

Time-Integrative Passive sampling combined with TOxicity Profiling (TIPTOP): an effect-based strategy for cost-effective chemical water quality assessment

T. Hamers, J. Legradi, N. Zwart, F. Smedes, J. de Weert, EJ. van den Brandhof, D. van de Meent, D. de Zwart,

. 2018 ; 64 (-) : 48-59. [pub] 20180920

Language English Country Netherlands

Document type Journal Article

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19012290

This study aimed at demonstrating that effect-based monitoring with passive sampling followed by toxicity profiling is more protective and cost-effective than the current chemical water quality assessment strategy consisting of compound-by-compound chemical analysis of selected substances in grab samples. Passive samplers were deployed in the Dutch river delta and in WWTP effluents. Their extracts were tested in a battery of bioassays and chemically analyzed to obtain toxicity and chemical profiles, respectively. Chemical concentrations in water were retrieved from publicly available databases. Seven different strategies were used to interpret the chemical and toxicity profiles in terms of ecological risk. They all indicated that the river sampling locations were relatively clean. Chemical-based monitoring resulted for many substances in measurements below detection limit and could only explain <20% of the observed in vitro toxicity. Effect-based monitoring yielded more informative conclusions as it allowed for ranking the sampling sites and for estimating a margin-of-exposure towards chronic effect ranges. Effect-based monitoring was also cheaper and more cost-effective (i.e. yielding more information per euro spent). Based on its identified strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT), a future strategy for effect-based monitoring has been proposed.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19012290
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190411111619.0
007      
ta
008      
190405s2018 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.etap.2018.09.005 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30296657
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Hamers, Timo $u Department Environment & Health (E&H), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: timo.hamers@vu.nl.
245    10
$a Time-Integrative Passive sampling combined with TOxicity Profiling (TIPTOP): an effect-based strategy for cost-effective chemical water quality assessment / $c T. Hamers, J. Legradi, N. Zwart, F. Smedes, J. de Weert, EJ. van den Brandhof, D. van de Meent, D. de Zwart,
520    9_
$a This study aimed at demonstrating that effect-based monitoring with passive sampling followed by toxicity profiling is more protective and cost-effective than the current chemical water quality assessment strategy consisting of compound-by-compound chemical analysis of selected substances in grab samples. Passive samplers were deployed in the Dutch river delta and in WWTP effluents. Their extracts were tested in a battery of bioassays and chemically analyzed to obtain toxicity and chemical profiles, respectively. Chemical concentrations in water were retrieved from publicly available databases. Seven different strategies were used to interpret the chemical and toxicity profiles in terms of ecological risk. They all indicated that the river sampling locations were relatively clean. Chemical-based monitoring resulted for many substances in measurements below detection limit and could only explain <20% of the observed in vitro toxicity. Effect-based monitoring yielded more informative conclusions as it allowed for ranking the sampling sites and for estimating a margin-of-exposure towards chronic effect ranges. Effect-based monitoring was also cheaper and more cost-effective (i.e. yielding more information per euro spent). Based on its identified strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT), a future strategy for effect-based monitoring has been proposed.
650    _2
$a androgeny $x analýza $x toxicita $7 D000728
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a biotest $7 D001681
650    _2
$a monitorování životního prostředí $x metody $7 D004784
650    _2
$a estrogeny $x analýza $x toxicita $7 D004967
650    _2
$a mutageny $x analýza $x toxicita $7 D009153
650    _2
$a řeky $x chemie $7 D045483
650    _2
$a chemické látky znečišťující vodu $x analýza $x toxicita $7 D014874
650    _2
$a kvalita vody $7 D060753
651    _2
$a Nizozemsko $7 D009426
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Legradi, Jessica $u Department Environment & Health (E&H), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Zwart, Nick $u Department Environment & Health (E&H), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a Smedes, Foppe $u Deltares, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Recetox - Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a de Weert, Jasperien $u Deltares, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a van den Brandhof, Evert-Jan $u National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a van de Meent, Dik $u National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands; Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
700    1_
$a de Zwart, Dick $u National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands; DdZ Ecotox, Odijk, The Netherlands.
773    0_
$w MED00008557 $t Environmental toxicology and pharmacology $x 1872-7077 $g Roč. 64, č. - (2018), s. 48-59
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30296657 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190405 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190411111636 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1391600 $s 1050595
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 64 $c - $d 48-59 $e 20180920 $i 1872-7077 $m Environmental toxicology and pharmacology $n Environ. toxicol. pharmacol. $x MED00008557
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190405

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options