-
Something wrong with this record ?
Effects of antifreeze proteins on cryopreserved sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) sperm motility variables and fertilization capacity
M. Xin, V. Tučková, M. Rodina, V. Kholodnyy, H. Dadras, S. Boryshpolets, A. Shaliutina-Kolešová, O. Linhart,
Language English Country Netherlands
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Fertilization MeSH
- Cryopreservation methods veterinary MeSH
- Antifreeze Proteins pharmacology MeSH
- Sperm Motility * drug effects physiology MeSH
- Fishes physiology MeSH
- Spermatozoa physiology MeSH
- Semen Preservation MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Male MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
The effect of antifreeze proteins on sterlet, Acipenser ruthenus sperm motility variables and fertilization rate were investigated after cryopreservation. Two types of antifreeze proteins (AFPI or AFPIII) were used at concentrations of 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 μg/mL. The motility variables of fresh and cryopreserved sperm with and without addition of antifreeze proteins were evaluated by the Computer Assisted Semen Analyzer (CASA). The fertilization rate using about 200,000 spermatozoa per egg was evaluated after 54 h incubation at 17 °C during the early stage of organogenesis. The motility, curvilinear velocity and straight-line velocity of fresh sperm was 93 ± 5%, 128 ± 13 μm/s and 89 ± 9 μm/s, respectively. There was a significant decrease of sperm motility rate between fresh sperm and cryopreserved sperm with/without addition of antifreeze proteins. The greatest motility among thawed samples was in the sperm cryopreserved with 10 μg/mL of AFPI (56 ± 20%), however, these data were not different compared to the sperm without antifreeze proteins (49 ± 14%). No statistical variations were detected in curvilinear velocity nor straight-line velocity. The fertilization rate with fresh sperm was 67 ± 7%. No significant differences were detected in fertilization rate between fresh and cryopreserved spermatozoa with/without addition of antifreeze proteins, except the sperm cryopreserved with 100 μg/mL of AFPIII (39 ± 14%). Thus, it is concluded that addition of antifreeze proteins to cryopreservation medium do not improve nor have toxicity effects on the quality and fertilization capacity of sterlet sperm after thawing.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19012494
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190409141124.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190405s2018 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2018.07.007 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30078737
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Xin, Miaomiao $u University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Zatisi 728/II, 38925 Vodnany, Czech Republic; Sino-Czech Joint Laboratory for Fish Conservation and Biotechnology, Yangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuhan, China. Electronic address: mxin@frov.jcu.cz.
- 245 10
- $a Effects of antifreeze proteins on cryopreserved sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus) sperm motility variables and fertilization capacity / $c M. Xin, V. Tučková, M. Rodina, V. Kholodnyy, H. Dadras, S. Boryshpolets, A. Shaliutina-Kolešová, O. Linhart,
- 520 9_
- $a The effect of antifreeze proteins on sterlet, Acipenser ruthenus sperm motility variables and fertilization rate were investigated after cryopreservation. Two types of antifreeze proteins (AFPI or AFPIII) were used at concentrations of 0.1, 1, 10 and 100 μg/mL. The motility variables of fresh and cryopreserved sperm with and without addition of antifreeze proteins were evaluated by the Computer Assisted Semen Analyzer (CASA). The fertilization rate using about 200,000 spermatozoa per egg was evaluated after 54 h incubation at 17 °C during the early stage of organogenesis. The motility, curvilinear velocity and straight-line velocity of fresh sperm was 93 ± 5%, 128 ± 13 μm/s and 89 ± 9 μm/s, respectively. There was a significant decrease of sperm motility rate between fresh sperm and cryopreserved sperm with/without addition of antifreeze proteins. The greatest motility among thawed samples was in the sperm cryopreserved with 10 μg/mL of AFPI (56 ± 20%), however, these data were not different compared to the sperm without antifreeze proteins (49 ± 14%). No statistical variations were detected in curvilinear velocity nor straight-line velocity. The fertilization rate with fresh sperm was 67 ± 7%. No significant differences were detected in fertilization rate between fresh and cryopreserved spermatozoa with/without addition of antifreeze proteins, except the sperm cryopreserved with 100 μg/mL of AFPIII (39 ± 14%). Thus, it is concluded that addition of antifreeze proteins to cryopreservation medium do not improve nor have toxicity effects on the quality and fertilization capacity of sterlet sperm after thawing.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 _2
- $a kryoprotektivní proteiny $x farmakologie $7 D021301
- 650 _2
- $a kryoprezervace $x metody $x veterinární $7 D015925
- 650 _2
- $a fertilizace $7 D005306
- 650 _2
- $a ryby $x fyziologie $7 D005399
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a uchování spermatu $7 D012662
- 650 12
- $a motilita spermií $x účinky léků $x fyziologie $7 D013081
- 650 _2
- $a spermie $x fyziologie $7 D013094
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Tučková, Vladimíra $u University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Zatisi 728/II, 38925 Vodnany, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Rodina, Marek $u University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Zatisi 728/II, 38925 Vodnany, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kholodnyy, Vitaliy $u University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Zatisi 728/II, 38925 Vodnany, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Dadras, Hadiseh $u University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Zatisi 728/II, 38925 Vodnany, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Boryshpolets, Sergii $u University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Zatisi 728/II, 38925 Vodnany, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Shaliutina-Kolešová, Anna $u University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Zatisi 728/II, 38925 Vodnany, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Linhart, Otomar $u University of South Bohemia in Ceske Budejovice, Faculty of Fisheries and Protection of Waters, South Bohemian Research Center of Aquaculture and Biodiversity of Hydrocenoses, Research Institute of Fish Culture and Hydrobiology, Zatisi 728/II, 38925 Vodnany, Czech Republic; Sino-Czech Joint Laboratory for Fish Conservation and Biotechnology, Yangtze River Fisheries Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Fishery Sciences, Wuhan, China.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006160 $t Animal reproduction science $x 1873-2232 $g Roč. 196, č. - (2018), s. 143-149
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30078737 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190409141139 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1391804 $s 1050799
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 196 $c - $d 143-149 $e 20180729 $i 1873-2232 $m Animal reproduction science $n Anim Reprod Sci $x MED00006160
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190405