-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Effect of different resin luting cements on the marginal fit of lithium disilicate pressed crowns
R. Mounajjed, TJ. Salinas, T. Ingr, B. Azar,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
- MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- moláry MeSH
- pryskyřičné cementy * MeSH
- techniky in vitro MeSH
- zubní cementy * MeSH
- zubní korunky * MeSH
- zubní porcelán * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The vertical marginal discrepancy of restorations can increase upon cementation, and poor marginal fit can lead to cement dissolution, marginal discoloration, microleakage, and secondary caries. The amount of increase is related to the type of luting cement used, but how lithium disilicate pressed crowns are affected by different resin cements is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of using different resin luting cements on the vertical marginal discrepancy of lithium disilicate pressed crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 18 intact extracted mandibular third molars were disinfected in a solution of 10% formalin for 7 days and were then prepared to receive a ceramic crown. Impressions were made with polyvinyl siloxane and lithium disilicate pressed crowns made and cemented with 1 of 3 resin luting cements. The marginal discrepancy was measured at 4 points on the finishing line of each tooth, with optical microscopy at ×200 magnification before and after cementation. Statistical analysis was done with the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare the median marginal increase among the 3 groups (a=.05). RESULTS: The least amount of marginal increase after cementation was with Harvard PremiumFlow cement, with an average marginal increase of 42 ±11 μm. RelyX Ultimate cement increased the margins by an average 45 ±29 μm. The highest marginal increase was found in the Enamel Plus HRi preheated composite resin group (116 ±47 μm). CONCLUSIONS: The marginal increase of pressed crowns cemented with preheated composite resin (Enamel Plus HRi) exceeded the clinically acceptable range of marginal discrepancy.
Doctoral student Department of Experimental Physics Palacky University Olomouc Czech Republic
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19013011
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20190416075903.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190405s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.001 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29150135
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Mounajjed, Radek $u Research Associate, Institute of Dentistry and Oral Sciences, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Effect of different resin luting cements on the marginal fit of lithium disilicate pressed crowns / $c R. Mounajjed, TJ. Salinas, T. Ingr, B. Azar,
- 520 9_
- $a STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The vertical marginal discrepancy of restorations can increase upon cementation, and poor marginal fit can lead to cement dissolution, marginal discoloration, microleakage, and secondary caries. The amount of increase is related to the type of luting cement used, but how lithium disilicate pressed crowns are affected by different resin cements is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of using different resin luting cements on the vertical marginal discrepancy of lithium disilicate pressed crowns. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 18 intact extracted mandibular third molars were disinfected in a solution of 10% formalin for 7 days and were then prepared to receive a ceramic crown. Impressions were made with polyvinyl siloxane and lithium disilicate pressed crowns made and cemented with 1 of 3 resin luting cements. The marginal discrepancy was measured at 4 points on the finishing line of each tooth, with optical microscopy at ×200 magnification before and after cementation. Statistical analysis was done with the Kruskal-Wallis test to compare the median marginal increase among the 3 groups (a=.05). RESULTS: The least amount of marginal increase after cementation was with Harvard PremiumFlow cement, with an average marginal increase of 42 ±11 μm. RelyX Ultimate cement increased the margins by an average 45 ±29 μm. The highest marginal increase was found in the Enamel Plus HRi preheated composite resin group (116 ±47 μm). CONCLUSIONS: The marginal increase of pressed crowns cemented with preheated composite resin (Enamel Plus HRi) exceeded the clinically acceptable range of marginal discrepancy.
- 650 12
- $a zubní korunky $7 D003442
- 650 12
- $a zubní cementy $7 D003738
- 650 12
- $a zubní porcelán $7 D003776
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a techniky in vitro $7 D066298
- 650 _2
- $a moláry $7 D008963
- 650 12
- $a pryskyřičné cementy $7 D019279
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Salinas, Thomas J $u Professor, Dentistry, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.
- 700 1_
- $a Ingr, Tomas $u Doctoral student, Department of Experimental Physics, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Azar, Basel $u Research Associate, Institute of Dentistry and Oral Sciences, Palacky University, Olomouc, Czech Republic. Electronic address: baselazar1@hotmail.com.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00002910 $t The Journal of prosthetic dentistry $x 1097-6841 $g Roč. 119, č. 6 (2018), s. 975-980
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29150135 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190405 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20190416075929 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1392321 $s 1051316
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 119 $c 6 $d 975-980 $e 20171115 $i 1097-6841 $m The Journal of prosthetic dentistry $n J Prosthet Dent $x MED00002910
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190405
