• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Evaluation of enterococci for potential probiotic utilization in dogs

I. Kubašová, A. Lauková, Ľ. Hamarová, P. Pristaš, V. Strompfová,

. 2019 ; 64 (2) : 177-187. [pub] 20180817

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19015094

Some strains of the genus Enterococcus are effective probiotic bacteria if they meet safety and probiotic criteria. In our study, 17 canine enterococci previously selected from a group of 160 isolates based on safety criteria were screened for some functional properties relevant to their use as probiotics. The results of antimicrobial resistance testing showed sensitivity of eleven strains to EFSA recommended antimicrobials. In contrast, the most frequent resistance was observed for cefotaxim (15/17) and oxacillin (13/17). PCR detection of resistance genes (vanA, vanB, vanC, tetM, tetL, ermB, and mefA) revealed the presence of mefA gene in five Enterococcus faecium strains and vanA gene in one strain. The production of enzymes commonly associated with intestinal diseases was in general rare (β-glucosidase 2/17, α-chymotrypsin 1/17, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase 0/17, and β-glucuronidase 0/17). The measurement of strain survival rate (%) under the conditions simulating gastric (pH 2.5) and bile juices (0.3% bile) showed considerable differences between strains (< 0.01 to 4.7% after 90 min for gastric juices, 48.0 to 254.0% after 180 min for bile). The concentration of produced L-lactic acid ranged between 83.1 to 119.3 mmol/L after 48 h cultivation depending on the strain. All strains fermented 16 out of 49 different carbohydrates (range from 17 to 23/49). Antimicrobial activity was recorded for two strains against some species of Listeria sp. and Enterococcus sp. Finally, two E. faecium candidates (IK25 and D7) were selected for testing in dogs, and hereafter they could possibly extend the currently limited range of beneficial bacteria of canine origin used as a dietary supplement for dogs.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19015094
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190425081818.0
007      
ta
008      
190423s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1007/s12223-018-0640-1 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30120711
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Kubašová, Ivana $u Centre of Biosciences Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01, Košice, Slovakia.
245    10
$a Evaluation of enterococci for potential probiotic utilization in dogs / $c I. Kubašová, A. Lauková, Ľ. Hamarová, P. Pristaš, V. Strompfová,
520    9_
$a Some strains of the genus Enterococcus are effective probiotic bacteria if they meet safety and probiotic criteria. In our study, 17 canine enterococci previously selected from a group of 160 isolates based on safety criteria were screened for some functional properties relevant to their use as probiotics. The results of antimicrobial resistance testing showed sensitivity of eleven strains to EFSA recommended antimicrobials. In contrast, the most frequent resistance was observed for cefotaxim (15/17) and oxacillin (13/17). PCR detection of resistance genes (vanA, vanB, vanC, tetM, tetL, ermB, and mefA) revealed the presence of mefA gene in five Enterococcus faecium strains and vanA gene in one strain. The production of enzymes commonly associated with intestinal diseases was in general rare (β-glucosidase 2/17, α-chymotrypsin 1/17, N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase 0/17, and β-glucuronidase 0/17). The measurement of strain survival rate (%) under the conditions simulating gastric (pH 2.5) and bile juices (0.3% bile) showed considerable differences between strains (< 0.01 to 4.7% after 90 min for gastric juices, 48.0 to 254.0% after 180 min for bile). The concentration of produced L-lactic acid ranged between 83.1 to 119.3 mmol/L after 48 h cultivation depending on the strain. All strains fermented 16 out of 49 different carbohydrates (range from 17 to 23/49). Antimicrobial activity was recorded for two strains against some species of Listeria sp. and Enterococcus sp. Finally, two E. faecium candidates (IK25 and D7) were selected for testing in dogs, and hereafter they could possibly extend the currently limited range of beneficial bacteria of canine origin used as a dietary supplement for dogs.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a antibakteriální látky $x farmakologie $x normy $7 D000900
650    _2
$a Bacteria $x účinky léků $7 D001419
650    _2
$a bakteriociny $x genetika $7 D001430
650    _2
$a žluč $7 D001646
650    _2
$a metabolismus sacharidů $7 D050260
650    _2
$a psi $7 D004285
650    _2
$a bakteriální léková rezistence $x genetika $7 D024881
650    _2
$a Enterococcus $x účinky léků $x genetika $x metabolismus $x fyziologie $7 D016983
650    _2
$a žaludeční kyselina $7 D005744
650    _2
$a bakteriální geny $7 D005798
650    _2
$a kyselina mléčná $x biosyntéza $7 D019344
650    _2
$a mikrobiální testy citlivosti $7 D008826
650    _2
$a probiotika $x farmakologie $7 D019936
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Lauková, Andrea $u Centre of Biosciences Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01, Košice, Slovakia.
700    1_
$a Hamarová, Ľudmila $u Centre of Biosciences Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01, Košice, Slovakia.
700    1_
$a Pristaš, Peter $u Centre of Biosciences Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01, Košice, Slovakia.
700    1_
$a Strompfová, Viola $u Centre of Biosciences Slovak Academy of Sciences, Institute of Animal Physiology, Šoltésovej 4-6, 040 01, Košice, Slovakia. strompfv@saske.sk.
773    0_
$w MED00011005 $t Folia microbiologica $x 1874-9356 $g Roč. 64, č. 2 (2019), s. 177-187
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30120711 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190423 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190425081857 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1398221 $s 1053493
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 64 $c 2 $d 177-187 $e 20180817 $i 1874-9356 $m Folia microbiologica $n Folia microbiol. (Prague) $x MED00011005
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190423

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...