• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Oxidation of imidazole- and pyrazole-derived aldehydes by plant aldehyde dehydrogenases from the family 2 and 10

J. Frömmel, R. Končitíková, D. Kopečný, M. Soural, M. Šebela,

. 2019 ; 304 (-) : 194-201. [pub] 20190213

Jazyk angličtina Země Irsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19027812

Plant cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenases from family 2 (ALDH2s, EC 1.2.1.3) are non-specific enzymes and participate for example in the metabolism of acetaldehyde or biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids. Plant aminoaldehyde dehydrogenases (AMADHs, ALDH10 family, EC 1.2.1.19) are broadly specific and play an important role in polyamine degradation or production of osmoprotectants. We have tested imidazole and pyrazole carbaldehydes and their alkyl-, allyl-, benzyl-, phenyl-, pyrimidinyl- or thienyl-derivatives as possible substrates of plant ALDH2 and ALDH10 enzymes. Imidazole represents a building block of histidine, histamine as well as certain alkaloids. It also appears in synthetic pharmaceuticals such as imidazole antifungals. Biological compounds containing pyrazole are rare (e.g. pyrazole-1-alanine and pyrazofurin antibiotics) but the ring is often found as a constituent of many synthetic drugs and pesticides. The aim was to evaluate whether aldehyde compounds based on azole heterocycles are oxidized by the enzymes, which would further support their expected role as detoxifying aldehyde scavengers. The analyzed imidazole and pyrazole carbaldehydes were only slowly converted by ALDH10s but well oxidized by cytosolic maize ALDH2 isoforms (particularly by ALDH2C1). In the latter case, the respective Km values were in the range of 10-2000 μmol l-1; the kcat values appeared mostly between 0.1 and 1.0 s-1. The carbaldehyde group at the position 4 of imidazole was oxidized faster than that at the position 2. Such a difference was not observed for pyrazole carbaldehydes. Aldehydes with an aromatic substituent on their heterocyclic ring were oxidized faster than those with an aliphatic substituent. The most efficient of the tested substrates were comparable to benzaldehyde and p-anisaldehyde known as the best aromatic aldehyde substrates of plant cytosolic ALDH2s in vitro.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19027812
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190823090704.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2019 ie f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.cbi.2019.02.008 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30768969
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ie
100    1_
$a Frömmel, Jan $u Department of Protein Biochemistry and Proteomics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 27, 783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Oxidation of imidazole- and pyrazole-derived aldehydes by plant aldehyde dehydrogenases from the family 2 and 10 / $c J. Frömmel, R. Končitíková, D. Kopečný, M. Soural, M. Šebela,
520    9_
$a Plant cytosolic aldehyde dehydrogenases from family 2 (ALDH2s, EC 1.2.1.3) are non-specific enzymes and participate for example in the metabolism of acetaldehyde or biosynthesis of phenylpropanoids. Plant aminoaldehyde dehydrogenases (AMADHs, ALDH10 family, EC 1.2.1.19) are broadly specific and play an important role in polyamine degradation or production of osmoprotectants. We have tested imidazole and pyrazole carbaldehydes and their alkyl-, allyl-, benzyl-, phenyl-, pyrimidinyl- or thienyl-derivatives as possible substrates of plant ALDH2 and ALDH10 enzymes. Imidazole represents a building block of histidine, histamine as well as certain alkaloids. It also appears in synthetic pharmaceuticals such as imidazole antifungals. Biological compounds containing pyrazole are rare (e.g. pyrazole-1-alanine and pyrazofurin antibiotics) but the ring is often found as a constituent of many synthetic drugs and pesticides. The aim was to evaluate whether aldehyde compounds based on azole heterocycles are oxidized by the enzymes, which would further support their expected role as detoxifying aldehyde scavengers. The analyzed imidazole and pyrazole carbaldehydes were only slowly converted by ALDH10s but well oxidized by cytosolic maize ALDH2 isoforms (particularly by ALDH2C1). In the latter case, the respective Km values were in the range of 10-2000 μmol l-1; the kcat values appeared mostly between 0.1 and 1.0 s-1. The carbaldehyde group at the position 4 of imidazole was oxidized faster than that at the position 2. Such a difference was not observed for pyrazole carbaldehydes. Aldehydes with an aromatic substituent on their heterocyclic ring were oxidized faster than those with an aliphatic substituent. The most efficient of the tested substrates were comparable to benzaldehyde and p-anisaldehyde known as the best aromatic aldehyde substrates of plant cytosolic ALDH2s in vitro.
650    _2
$a aldehyddehydrogenasa $x metabolismus $7 D000444
650    _2
$a aldehydy $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D000447
650    _2
$a imidazoly $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D007093
650    _2
$a Solanum lycopersicum $x enzymologie $7 D018551
650    _2
$a molekulární struktura $7 D015394
650    _2
$a oxidace-redukce $7 D010084
650    _2
$a hrách setý $x enzymologie $7 D018532
650    _2
$a pyrazoly $x chemie $x metabolismus $7 D011720
650    _2
$a kukuřice setá $x enzymologie $7 D003313
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Končitíková, Radka $u Department of Protein Biochemistry and Proteomics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 27, 783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kopečný, David $u Department of Protein Biochemistry and Proteomics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 27, 783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic. Electronic address: david.kopecny@upol.cz.
700    1_
$a Soural, Miroslav $u Institute of Molecular and Translation Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacký University, Hněvotínská 5, 779 00, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Šebela, Marek $u Department of Protein Biochemistry and Proteomics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Faculty of Science, Palacký University, Šlechtitelů 27, 783 71, Olomouc, Czech Republic. Electronic address: marek.sebela@upol.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00002111 $t Chemico-biological interactions $x 1872-7786 $g Roč. 304, č. - (2019), s. 194-201
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30768969 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190823090919 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1432961 $s 1066272
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 304 $c - $d 194-201 $e 20190213 $i 1872-7786 $m Chemico-biological interactions $n Chem Biol Interact $x MED00002111
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...