-
Something wrong with this record ?
Biomechanical comparison of cemented versus non-cemented anterior screw fixation in type II odontoid fractures in the elderly: a cadaveric study
P. Rehousek, E. Jenner, J. Holton, M. Czyz, L. Capek, P. Henys, M. Kulvajtova, M. Krbec, J. Skala-Rosenbaum,
Language English Country United States
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article
- MeSH
- Biomechanical Phenomena MeSH
- Odontoid Process injuries surgery MeSH
- Spinal Fractures surgery MeSH
- Bone Cements adverse effects MeSH
- Bone Screws adverse effects MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Cadaver MeSH
- Polymethyl Methacrylate adverse effects MeSH
- Prosthesis Failure adverse effects MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Fracture Fixation, Internal adverse effects methods MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Odontoid process fractures are the most common injuries of the cervical spine in the elderly. Anterior screw stabilization of type II odontoid process fractures improves survival and function in these patients but may be complicated by failure of fixation. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to determine whether cement augmentation of a standard anterior screw provides biomechanically superior fixation of type II odontoid fractures in comparison with a non-cemented standard screw. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty human cadaveric C2 vertebrae from elderly donors (mean age 83 years) were obtained. METHODS: Anderson and D'Alonzo type IIa odontoid fracture was created by transverse osteotomy, and fluoroscopy-guided anterior screw fixation was performed. The specimens were divided into two matched groups. The cemented group (n=10) had radiopaque high viscosity polymethylmethacrylate cement injected via Jamshidi needle into the base of the odontoid process. The other group was not augmented. A V-shaped punch was used for loading the odontoid in an anteroposterior direction until failure. The failure state was defined as screw cutout or 5% force decrease. Mean failure load and bending stiffness were calculated. RESULTS: The mean failure load for the cemented group was 352±12 N compared with 168±23 N for the non-cemented group (p<.001). The mean initial stiffness of the non-cemented group was 153±19 N/mm compared with 195±29 N/mm for the cemented group (p<.001) CONCLUSIONS: Cement augmentation of an anterior standard screw fixation of type II odontoid process fractures in elderly patients significantly increased load to failure under anteroposterior load in comparison with non-augmented fixation. This may be a valuable technique to reduce failure of fixation.
3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Ruska 2411 87 100 00 Praha 10 Vinohrady Prague Czechia
Royal Orthopaedic Hospital Bristol Rd South Birmingham B32 1AP UK
Technical University of Liberec Studentska 1402 2 461 17 Liberec Czechia
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19028419
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200528083510.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 190813s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.019 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29783086
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Rehousek, Petr $u Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Rd South, Birmingham B32 1AP, UK; Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, 100 00 Praha 10-Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia. Electronic address: petr.rehousek@nhs.net.
- 245 10
- $a Biomechanical comparison of cemented versus non-cemented anterior screw fixation in type II odontoid fractures in the elderly: a cadaveric study / $c P. Rehousek, E. Jenner, J. Holton, M. Czyz, L. Capek, P. Henys, M. Kulvajtova, M. Krbec, J. Skala-Rosenbaum,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Odontoid process fractures are the most common injuries of the cervical spine in the elderly. Anterior screw stabilization of type II odontoid process fractures improves survival and function in these patients but may be complicated by failure of fixation. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to determine whether cement augmentation of a standard anterior screw provides biomechanically superior fixation of type II odontoid fractures in comparison with a non-cemented standard screw. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty human cadaveric C2 vertebrae from elderly donors (mean age 83 years) were obtained. METHODS: Anderson and D'Alonzo type IIa odontoid fracture was created by transverse osteotomy, and fluoroscopy-guided anterior screw fixation was performed. The specimens were divided into two matched groups. The cemented group (n=10) had radiopaque high viscosity polymethylmethacrylate cement injected via Jamshidi needle into the base of the odontoid process. The other group was not augmented. A V-shaped punch was used for loading the odontoid in an anteroposterior direction until failure. The failure state was defined as screw cutout or 5% force decrease. Mean failure load and bending stiffness were calculated. RESULTS: The mean failure load for the cemented group was 352±12 N compared with 168±23 N for the non-cemented group (p<.001). The mean initial stiffness of the non-cemented group was 153±19 N/mm compared with 195±29 N/mm for the cemented group (p<.001) CONCLUSIONS: Cement augmentation of an anterior standard screw fixation of type II odontoid process fractures in elderly patients significantly increased load to failure under anteroposterior load in comparison with non-augmented fixation. This may be a valuable technique to reduce failure of fixation.
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 _2
- $a biomechanika $7 D001696
- 650 _2
- $a kostní cementy $x škodlivé účinky $7 D001843
- 650 _2
- $a kostní šrouby $x škodlivé účinky $7 D001863
- 650 _2
- $a mrtvola $7 D002102
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a vnitřní fixace fraktury $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D005593
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a dens axis $x zranění $x chirurgie $7 D009809
- 650 _2
- $a polymethylmethakrylát $x škodlivé účinky $7 D019904
- 650 _2
- $a selhání protézy $x škodlivé účinky $7 D011475
- 650 _2
- $a fraktury páteře $x chirurgie $7 D016103
- 655 _2
- $a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Jenner, Edward $u Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Rd South, Birmingham B32 1AP, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Holton, James $u Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Rd South, Birmingham B32 1AP, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Czyz, Marcin $u Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Rd South, Birmingham B32 1AP, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Capek, Lukas $u Technical University of Liberec, Studentska 1402/2, 461 17 Liberec, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Henys, Petr $u Technical University of Liberec, Studentska 1402/2, 461 17 Liberec, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Kulvajtová, Markéta $7 xx0248321 $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, 100 00 Praha 10-Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Krbec, Martin $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, 100 00 Praha 10-Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Skala-Rosenbaum, Jiri $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, 100 00 Praha 10-Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00008667 $t The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society $x 1878-1632 $g Roč. 18, č. 10 (2018), s. 1888-1895
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29783086 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20190813 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200528083507 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1433568 $s 1066879
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 18 $c 10 $d 1888-1895 $e 20180518 $i 1878-1632 $m The spine journal $n Spine J $x MED00008667
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20190813