• Something wrong with this record ?

Biomechanical comparison of cemented versus non-cemented anterior screw fixation in type II odontoid fractures in the elderly: a cadaveric study

P. Rehousek, E. Jenner, J. Holton, M. Czyz, L. Capek, P. Henys, M. Kulvajtova, M. Krbec, J. Skala-Rosenbaum,

. 2018 ; 18 (10) : 1888-1895. [pub] 20180518

Language English Country United States

Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Odontoid process fractures are the most common injuries of the cervical spine in the elderly. Anterior screw stabilization of type II odontoid process fractures improves survival and function in these patients but may be complicated by failure of fixation. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to determine whether cement augmentation of a standard anterior screw provides biomechanically superior fixation of type II odontoid fractures in comparison with a non-cemented standard screw. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty human cadaveric C2 vertebrae from elderly donors (mean age 83 years) were obtained. METHODS: Anderson and D'Alonzo type IIa odontoid fracture was created by transverse osteotomy, and fluoroscopy-guided anterior screw fixation was performed. The specimens were divided into two matched groups. The cemented group (n=10) had radiopaque high viscosity polymethylmethacrylate cement injected via Jamshidi needle into the base of the odontoid process. The other group was not augmented. A V-shaped punch was used for loading the odontoid in an anteroposterior direction until failure. The failure state was defined as screw cutout or 5% force decrease. Mean failure load and bending stiffness were calculated. RESULTS: The mean failure load for the cemented group was 352±12 N compared with 168±23 N for the non-cemented group (p<.001). The mean initial stiffness of the non-cemented group was 153±19 N/mm compared with 195±29 N/mm for the cemented group (p<.001) CONCLUSIONS: Cement augmentation of an anterior standard screw fixation of type II odontoid process fractures in elderly patients significantly increased load to failure under anteroposterior load in comparison with non-augmented fixation. This may be a valuable technique to reduce failure of fixation.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19028419
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200528083510.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.spinee.2018.05.019 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29783086
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Rehousek, Petr $u Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Rd South, Birmingham B32 1AP, UK; Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, 100 00 Praha 10-Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia. Electronic address: petr.rehousek@nhs.net.
245    10
$a Biomechanical comparison of cemented versus non-cemented anterior screw fixation in type II odontoid fractures in the elderly: a cadaveric study / $c P. Rehousek, E. Jenner, J. Holton, M. Czyz, L. Capek, P. Henys, M. Kulvajtova, M. Krbec, J. Skala-Rosenbaum,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Odontoid process fractures are the most common injuries of the cervical spine in the elderly. Anterior screw stabilization of type II odontoid process fractures improves survival and function in these patients but may be complicated by failure of fixation. PURPOSE: The present study aimed to determine whether cement augmentation of a standard anterior screw provides biomechanically superior fixation of type II odontoid fractures in comparison with a non-cemented standard screw. STUDY DESIGN: Twenty human cadaveric C2 vertebrae from elderly donors (mean age 83 years) were obtained. METHODS: Anderson and D'Alonzo type IIa odontoid fracture was created by transverse osteotomy, and fluoroscopy-guided anterior screw fixation was performed. The specimens were divided into two matched groups. The cemented group (n=10) had radiopaque high viscosity polymethylmethacrylate cement injected via Jamshidi needle into the base of the odontoid process. The other group was not augmented. A V-shaped punch was used for loading the odontoid in an anteroposterior direction until failure. The failure state was defined as screw cutout or 5% force decrease. Mean failure load and bending stiffness were calculated. RESULTS: The mean failure load for the cemented group was 352±12 N compared with 168±23 N for the non-cemented group (p<.001). The mean initial stiffness of the non-cemented group was 153±19 N/mm compared with 195±29 N/mm for the cemented group (p<.001) CONCLUSIONS: Cement augmentation of an anterior standard screw fixation of type II odontoid process fractures in elderly patients significantly increased load to failure under anteroposterior load in comparison with non-augmented fixation. This may be a valuable technique to reduce failure of fixation.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a biomechanika $7 D001696
650    _2
$a kostní cementy $x škodlivé účinky $7 D001843
650    _2
$a kostní šrouby $x škodlivé účinky $7 D001863
650    _2
$a mrtvola $7 D002102
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a vnitřní fixace fraktury $x škodlivé účinky $x metody $7 D005593
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a dens axis $x zranění $x chirurgie $7 D009809
650    _2
$a polymethylmethakrylát $x škodlivé účinky $7 D019904
650    _2
$a selhání protézy $x škodlivé účinky $7 D011475
650    _2
$a fraktury páteře $x chirurgie $7 D016103
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Jenner, Edward $u Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Rd South, Birmingham B32 1AP, UK.
700    1_
$a Holton, James $u Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Rd South, Birmingham B32 1AP, UK.
700    1_
$a Czyz, Marcin $u Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Rd South, Birmingham B32 1AP, UK.
700    1_
$a Capek, Lukas $u Technical University of Liberec, Studentska 1402/2, 461 17 Liberec, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Henys, Petr $u Technical University of Liberec, Studentska 1402/2, 461 17 Liberec, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Kulvajtová, Markéta $7 xx0248321 $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, 100 00 Praha 10-Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Krbec, Martin $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, 100 00 Praha 10-Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia.
700    1_
$a Skala-Rosenbaum, Jiri $u Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Ruska 2411/87, 100 00 Praha 10-Vinohrady, Prague, Czechia.
773    0_
$w MED00008667 $t The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society $x 1878-1632 $g Roč. 18, č. 10 (2018), s. 1888-1895
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29783086 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200528083507 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1433568 $s 1066879
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 18 $c 10 $d 1888-1895 $e 20180518 $i 1878-1632 $m The spine journal $n Spine J $x MED00008667
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...