Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

How socioemotional setting modulates late-stage conflict resolution processes in the lateral prefrontal cortex

ML. Schreiter, WX. Chmielewski, C. Beste,

. 2018 ; 18 (3) : 521-535. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19028465
E-zdroje Online Plný text

NLK ProQuest Central od 2011-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost) od 2011-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest) od 2011-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Health & Medicine (ProQuest) od 2011-03-01 do Před 1 rokem
Psychology Database (ProQuest) od 2011-03-01 do Před 1 rokem

The goal-directed control of behaviour critically depends on emotional regulation and constitutes the basis of mental well-being and social interactions. Within a socioemotional setting, it is necessary to prioritize effectively the relevant emotional information over interfering irrelevant emotional information to orchestrate cognitive resources and achieve appropriate behavior. Currently, it is elusive whether and how different socioemotional stimulus dimensions modulate cognitive control and conflict resolution. Theoretical considerations suggest that interference effects are less detrimental when conflicting emotional information is presented within a "positive socioemotional setting" compared with a "negative socioemotional setting." Using event-related potentials (ERPs) and source localization methods, we examined the basic system neurophysiological mechanisms and functional neuroanatomical structures associated with interactive effects of different interfering facial, socioemotional stimulus dimensions on conflict resolution. We account for interactive effects of different interfering socioemotional stimulus dimensions on conflict resolution, i.e., we show how the socioemotional valence modulates cognitive control (conflict processing). The data show that conflicts are stronger and more difficult to resolve in a negative emotional task-relevant setting than in a positive emotional task-relevant setting, where incongruent information barely induced conflicts. The degree of emotional conflict critically depends on the contextual emotional valence (positive or negative) in which this conflict occurs. The neurophysiological data show that these modulations were only reflected by late-stage conflict resolution processes associated with the middle (MFG) and superior frontal gyrus (SFG). Attentional selection processes and early-stage conflict monitoring do not seem to be modulated by interactive effects of different interfering socioemotional stimulus dimensions on conflict resolution.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19028465
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20190820090037.0
007      
ta
008      
190813s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3758/s13415-018-0585-5 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29693215
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Schreiter, Marie Luise $u Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Schubertstrasse 42, D-01309, Dresden, Germany. marieluise.schreiter@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
245    10
$a How socioemotional setting modulates late-stage conflict resolution processes in the lateral prefrontal cortex / $c ML. Schreiter, WX. Chmielewski, C. Beste,
520    9_
$a The goal-directed control of behaviour critically depends on emotional regulation and constitutes the basis of mental well-being and social interactions. Within a socioemotional setting, it is necessary to prioritize effectively the relevant emotional information over interfering irrelevant emotional information to orchestrate cognitive resources and achieve appropriate behavior. Currently, it is elusive whether and how different socioemotional stimulus dimensions modulate cognitive control and conflict resolution. Theoretical considerations suggest that interference effects are less detrimental when conflicting emotional information is presented within a "positive socioemotional setting" compared with a "negative socioemotional setting." Using event-related potentials (ERPs) and source localization methods, we examined the basic system neurophysiological mechanisms and functional neuroanatomical structures associated with interactive effects of different interfering facial, socioemotional stimulus dimensions on conflict resolution. We account for interactive effects of different interfering socioemotional stimulus dimensions on conflict resolution, i.e., we show how the socioemotional valence modulates cognitive control (conflict processing). The data show that conflicts are stronger and more difficult to resolve in a negative emotional task-relevant setting than in a positive emotional task-relevant setting, where incongruent information barely induced conflicts. The degree of emotional conflict critically depends on the contextual emotional valence (positive or negative) in which this conflict occurs. The neurophysiological data show that these modulations were only reflected by late-stage conflict resolution processes associated with the middle (MFG) and superior frontal gyrus (SFG). Attentional selection processes and early-stage conflict monitoring do not seem to be modulated by interactive effects of different interfering socioemotional stimulus dimensions on conflict resolution.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a pozornost $x fyziologie $7 D001288
650    12
$a mapování mozku $7 D001931
650    _2
$a emoce $x fyziologie $7 D004644
650    _2
$a evokované potenciály $x fyziologie $7 D005071
650    _2
$a výraz obličeje $7 D005149
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a vyjednávání $x psychologie $7 D017008
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Chmielewski, Witold X $u Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Schubertstrasse 42, D-01309, Dresden, Germany.
700    1_
$a Beste, Christian $u Cognitive Neurophysiology, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, TU Dresden, Schubertstrasse 42, D-01309, Dresden, Germany. Experimental Neurobiology, National Institute of Mental Health, Klecany, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00173411 $t Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience $x 1531-135X $g Roč. 18, č. 3 (2018), s. 521-535
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29693215 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20190813 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20190820090312 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1433614 $s 1066925
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 18 $c 3 $d 521-535 $e - $i 1531-135X $m Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience $n Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci $x MED00173411
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20190813

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...