• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Reliability of three common fecal egg counting techniques for detecting strongylid and ascarid infections in horses

J. Nápravníková, M. Petrtýl, R. Stupka, J. Vadlejch,

. 2019 ; 272 (-) : 53-57. [pub] 20190710

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko

Typ dokumentu srovnávací studie, časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19034434

The detection and quantification of nematode eggs using fecal egg count techniques have an irreplaceable role in equine parasitic control. The reliability, particularly precision and accuracy, of individual techniques have been described only for strongylid infections. The aim of this study was to compare three fecal egg count techniques used for the detection of the two most common equine nematode infections: strongylid and ascarid. The Simple McMaster, Concentration McMaster and Mini-FLOTAC techniques were tested on spiked fecal samples with various levels of egg concentration (50, 100, 200, 500, 1000 and 3000 eggs per gram) and naturally infected mixed strongylid-ascarid samples with 30 replicates. The Simple McMaster, Concentration McMaster and Mini-FLOTAC techniques had precision coefficients of variation of 44.33, 35.64 and 18.25% for the strongylid infection and 62.95, 35.71 and 18.95% for the ascarid infection, and percent accuracies (mean count/number of eggs spiked) of 97.53, 88.39 and 74.18% for the strongylid infection and 65.53, 83.18 and 90.28% for the ascarid infection, respectively. Accuracy depended greatly on the type of nematode, but precision did not. The Mini-FLOTAC technique was more precise than the Simple and Concentration McMaster techniques regardless of nematode type. Simple McMaster was the most accurate technique for detecting strongylid eggs, and Mini-FLOTAC was the most accurate technique for detecting ascarid eggs. Our results indicated that none of the current techniques were universally and sufficiently reliable for the simultaneous quantification of both of these common equine nematodes.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19034434
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191010130400.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2019 ne f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.vetpar.2019.07.001 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31395205
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a ne
100    1_
$a Nápravníková, J $u Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague, Suchdol, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Reliability of three common fecal egg counting techniques for detecting strongylid and ascarid infections in horses / $c J. Nápravníková, M. Petrtýl, R. Stupka, J. Vadlejch,
520    9_
$a The detection and quantification of nematode eggs using fecal egg count techniques have an irreplaceable role in equine parasitic control. The reliability, particularly precision and accuracy, of individual techniques have been described only for strongylid infections. The aim of this study was to compare three fecal egg count techniques used for the detection of the two most common equine nematode infections: strongylid and ascarid. The Simple McMaster, Concentration McMaster and Mini-FLOTAC techniques were tested on spiked fecal samples with various levels of egg concentration (50, 100, 200, 500, 1000 and 3000 eggs per gram) and naturally infected mixed strongylid-ascarid samples with 30 replicates. The Simple McMaster, Concentration McMaster and Mini-FLOTAC techniques had precision coefficients of variation of 44.33, 35.64 and 18.25% for the strongylid infection and 62.95, 35.71 and 18.95% for the ascarid infection, and percent accuracies (mean count/number of eggs spiked) of 97.53, 88.39 and 74.18% for the strongylid infection and 65.53, 83.18 and 90.28% for the ascarid infection, respectively. Accuracy depended greatly on the type of nematode, but precision did not. The Mini-FLOTAC technique was more precise than the Simple and Concentration McMaster techniques regardless of nematode type. Simple McMaster was the most accurate technique for detecting strongylid eggs, and Mini-FLOTAC was the most accurate technique for detecting ascarid eggs. Our results indicated that none of the current techniques were universally and sufficiently reliable for the simultaneous quantification of both of these common equine nematodes.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a askaridóza $x diagnóza $x parazitologie $x veterinární $7 D001198
650    _2
$a feces $x parazitologie $7 D005243
650    _2
$a nemoci koní $x diagnóza $x parazitologie $7 D006734
650    _2
$a koně $7 D006736
650    _2
$a počet parazitárních vajíček $x normy $x veterinární $7 D010270
650    _2
$a reprodukovatelnost výsledků $7 D015203
650    _2
$a strongyloidóza koní $x diagnóza $x parazitologie $7 D013319
655    _2
$a srovnávací studie $7 D003160
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Petrtýl, M $u Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague, Suchdol, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Stupka, R $u Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague, Suchdol, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Vadlejch, J $u Department of Zoology and Fisheries, Faculty of Agrobiology, Food and Natural Resources, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 165 00, Prague, Suchdol, Czech Republic. Electronic address: vadlejch@af.czu.cz.
773    0_
$w MED00006161 $t Veterinary parasitology $x 1873-2550 $g Roč. 272, č. - (2019), s. 53-57
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31395205 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191010130819 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1451094 $s 1072984
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 272 $c - $d 53-57 $e 20190710 $i 1873-2550 $m Veterinary parasitology $n Vet Parasitol $x MED00006161
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...