-
Something wrong with this record ?
Global impacts of future cropland expansion and intensification on agricultural markets and biodiversity
F. Zabel, R. Delzeit, JM. Schneider, R. Seppelt, W. Mauser, T. Václavík,
Language English Country England, Great Britain
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2015
Free Medical Journals
from 2010
Nature Open Access
from 2010-12-01
PubMed Central
from 2012
Europe PubMed Central
from 2012
ProQuest Central
from 2010-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2015-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2015-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2012-11-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2010-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2010
Springer Nature OA/Free Journals
from 2010-12-01
- MeSH
- Biodiversity * MeSH
- Models, Economic MeSH
- Climate Change MeSH
- Conservation of Natural Resources methods MeSH
- Agriculture economics methods MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
With rising demand for biomass, cropland expansion and intensification represent the main strategies to boost agricultural production, but are also major drivers of biodiversity decline. We investigate the consequences of attaining equal global production gains by 2030, either by cropland expansion or intensification, and analyse their impacts on agricultural markets and biodiversity. We find that both scenarios lead to lower crop prices across the world, even in regions where production decreases. Cropland expansion mostly affects biodiversity hotspots in Central and South America, while cropland intensification threatens biodiversity especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, India and China. Our results suggest that production gains will occur at the costs of biodiversity predominantly in developing tropical regions, while Europe and North America benefit from lower world market prices without putting their own biodiversity at risk. By identifying hotspots of potential future conflicts, we demonstrate where conservation prioritization is needed to balance agricultural production with conservation goals.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19034472
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20191008112948.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 191007s2019 enk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1038/s41467-019-10775-z $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31253787
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a enk
- 100 1_
- $a Zabel, Florian $u Department of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80333, Munich, Germany.
- 245 10
- $a Global impacts of future cropland expansion and intensification on agricultural markets and biodiversity / $c F. Zabel, R. Delzeit, JM. Schneider, R. Seppelt, W. Mauser, T. Václavík,
- 520 9_
- $a With rising demand for biomass, cropland expansion and intensification represent the main strategies to boost agricultural production, but are also major drivers of biodiversity decline. We investigate the consequences of attaining equal global production gains by 2030, either by cropland expansion or intensification, and analyse their impacts on agricultural markets and biodiversity. We find that both scenarios lead to lower crop prices across the world, even in regions where production decreases. Cropland expansion mostly affects biodiversity hotspots in Central and South America, while cropland intensification threatens biodiversity especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, India and China. Our results suggest that production gains will occur at the costs of biodiversity predominantly in developing tropical regions, while Europe and North America benefit from lower world market prices without putting their own biodiversity at risk. By identifying hotspots of potential future conflicts, we demonstrate where conservation prioritization is needed to balance agricultural production with conservation goals.
- 650 _2
- $a zemědělství $x ekonomika $x metody $7 D000383
- 650 12
- $a biodiverzita $7 D044822
- 650 _2
- $a klimatické změny $7 D057231
- 650 _2
- $a zachování přírodních zdrojů $x metody $7 D003247
- 650 _2
- $a ekonomické modely $7 D018803
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Delzeit, Ruth $u Kiel Institute for the World Economy, 24105, Kiel, Germany. ruth.delzeit@ifw-kiel.de.
- 700 1_
- $a Schneider, Julia M $u Department of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80333, Munich, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Seppelt, Ralf $u Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, 04318, Leipzig, Germany. Institute of Geoscience & Geography, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, 06099, Halle (Saale), Germany. iDiv-German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Mauser, Wolfram $u Department of Geography, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80333, Munich, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Václavík, Tomáš $u Department of Computational Landscape Ecology, UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, 04318, Leipzig, Germany. Faculty of Science, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc, 78371, Olomouc, Czech Republic. Global Change Research Institute of the Czech Academy of Sciences (CzechGlobe), 60300, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00184850 $t Nature communications $x 2041-1723 $g Roč. 10, č. 1 (2019), s. 2844
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31253787 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20191007 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20191008113404 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1451132 $s 1073022
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 10 $c 1 $d 2844 $e 20190628 $i 2041-1723 $m Nature communications $n Nat Commun $x MED00184850
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20191007