-
Something wrong with this record ?
Effects of various feedstocks on isotope fractionation of biogas and microbial community structure during anaerobic digestion
Z. Lv, Z. Chen, X. Chen, J. Liang, J. Jiang, GJ. Loake,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article
- MeSH
- Anaerobiosis MeSH
- Biofuels * MeSH
- Bioreactors MeSH
- Manure MeSH
- Isotopes MeSH
- Methane MeSH
- Microbiota * MeSH
- Swine MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Feedstock type influences bacterial and methanogenic communities in anaerobic digestion. These two communities work tightly to maintain the stability of anaerobic digestion. How to quick report the changes of microbial community structure especially methanogenesis is the key issue for optimizing anaerobic digestion process. In this study, 13C isotope fractionations of CH4 and CO2 in biogas and microbial community composition were analyzed in 5 different feedstocks. Our results showed that grass silage, maize silage and swine manure fed reactors had similar δ 13C values and methanogenic community composition, dominated by Methanosarcinaceae. The lowest δ 13CH4 values were detected in straw and chicken manure fed reactors, reflecting reduced microbial degradation of material or the presence of toxic components in these feedstocks. The straw fed bioreactor lead to low δ 13CH4 values, probably reflecting relatively high levels of the syntrophic acetate oxidizing bacteria, Synergistaceae and Syntrophaceae, which might work collectively with hydrogenotrophic methanogens, resulting in the low δ 13CH4 values in this bioreactor. Significantly, all core microbes in the 5 different feedstock fed bioreactors were either Clostridia species or related to the Synergistaceae (syntrophic acetate oxidizing bacteria).
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19034797
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20191008111447.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 191007s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.11.043 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30691895
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Lv, Zuopeng $u The Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Medicinal Plants of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Normal University, Shanghai Road 101, 221116 Xuzhou, China; Jiangsu Normal University - Edinburgh University, Centre for Transformative Biotechnology of Medicinal and Food Plants, Jiangsu Normal University, 101 Shanghai Road, Xuzhou, China. Electronic address: zuopenglv@126.com.
- 245 10
- $a Effects of various feedstocks on isotope fractionation of biogas and microbial community structure during anaerobic digestion / $c Z. Lv, Z. Chen, X. Chen, J. Liang, J. Jiang, GJ. Loake,
- 520 9_
- $a Feedstock type influences bacterial and methanogenic communities in anaerobic digestion. These two communities work tightly to maintain the stability of anaerobic digestion. How to quick report the changes of microbial community structure especially methanogenesis is the key issue for optimizing anaerobic digestion process. In this study, 13C isotope fractionations of CH4 and CO2 in biogas and microbial community composition were analyzed in 5 different feedstocks. Our results showed that grass silage, maize silage and swine manure fed reactors had similar δ 13C values and methanogenic community composition, dominated by Methanosarcinaceae. The lowest δ 13CH4 values were detected in straw and chicken manure fed reactors, reflecting reduced microbial degradation of material or the presence of toxic components in these feedstocks. The straw fed bioreactor lead to low δ 13CH4 values, probably reflecting relatively high levels of the syntrophic acetate oxidizing bacteria, Synergistaceae and Syntrophaceae, which might work collectively with hydrogenotrophic methanogens, resulting in the low δ 13CH4 values in this bioreactor. Significantly, all core microbes in the 5 different feedstock fed bioreactors were either Clostridia species or related to the Synergistaceae (syntrophic acetate oxidizing bacteria).
- 650 _2
- $a anaerobióza $7 D000693
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a biopaliva $7 D056804
- 650 _2
- $a bioreaktory $7 D019149
- 650 _2
- $a izotopy $7 D007554
- 650 _2
- $a hnůj $7 D008372
- 650 _2
- $a methan $7 D008697
- 650 12
- $a mikrobiota $7 D064307
- 650 _2
- $a prasata $7 D013552
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Chen, Zhongbing $u Department of Applied Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Chen, Xin $u The Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Medicinal Plants of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Normal University, Shanghai Road 101, 221116 Xuzhou, China; Jiangsu Normal University - Edinburgh University, Centre for Transformative Biotechnology of Medicinal and Food Plants, Jiangsu Normal University, 101 Shanghai Road, Xuzhou, China.
- 700 1_
- $a Liang, Jiazhuo $u The Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Medicinal Plants of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Normal University, Shanghai Road 101, 221116 Xuzhou, China; Jiangsu Normal University - Edinburgh University, Centre for Transformative Biotechnology of Medicinal and Food Plants, Jiangsu Normal University, 101 Shanghai Road, Xuzhou, China.
- 700 1_
- $a Jiang, Jihong $u The Key Laboratory of Biotechnology for Medicinal Plants of Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu Normal University, Shanghai Road 101, 221116 Xuzhou, China; Jiangsu Normal University - Edinburgh University, Centre for Transformative Biotechnology of Medicinal and Food Plants, Jiangsu Normal University, 101 Shanghai Road, Xuzhou, China.
- 700 1_
- $a Loake, Gary J $u Jiangsu Normal University - Edinburgh University, Centre for Transformative Biotechnology of Medicinal and Food Plants, Jiangsu Normal University, 101 Shanghai Road, Xuzhou, China; Institute of Molecular Plant Sciences, School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, King's Buildings, Edinburgh EH9 3JH, UK.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00006459 $t Waste management (New York, N.Y.) $x 1879-2456 $g Roč. 84, č. - (2019), s. 211-219
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30691895 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20191007 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20191008111903 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1451457 $s 1073347
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 84 $c - $d 211-219 $e 20181204 $i 1879-2456 $m Waste management $n Waste Manag $x MED00006459
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20191007