• Something wrong with this record ?

Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic waste: Environmental impact and economic assessment

YV. Fan, JJ. Klemeš, S. Perry, CT. Lee,

. 2019 ; 231 (-) : 352-363. [pub] 20181024

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article

Lignocellulosic waste (LW) is abundant in availability and is one of the suitable substrates for anaerobic digestion (AD). However, it is a complex solid substrate matrix that hinders the hydrolysis stage of anaerobic digestion. This study assessed various pre-treatment and post-treatments of lignocellulosic waste for anaerobic digestion benefiting from advanced P-graph and GaBi software (Thinkstep, Germany) from the perspective of cost and environmental performances (global warming potential, human toxicity, ozone depletion potential, particulate matter, photochemical oxidant creation, acidification and eutrophication potential). CaO pre-treatment (P4), H2S removal with membrane separation post-treatment (HSR MS) and without the composting of digestate is identified as the cost-optimal pathway. The biological (P7- Enzyme, P8- Microbial Consortium) and physical (P1- Grinding, P2- Steam Explosion, P3- Water Vapour) pre-treatments alternatives have lower environmental impacts than chemical pre-treatments (P4- CaO, P5- NaOH, P6- H2SO4) however they are not part of the near cost optimal solutions. For post-treatment, the near cost optimal alternatives are H2S removal with organic physical scrubbing (HSR OPS) and H2S removal with amine scrubbing (HSR AS). HSR AS has a better performance in the overall environmental impacts followed by HSR MS and HSR OPS. In general, the suggested cost-optimal solution is still having relatively lower environmental impacts and feasible for implementation (cost effective). There is very complicated to find a universal AD solution. Different scenarios (the type of substrate, the scale, product demand, policies) have different constraints and consequently solutions. The trade-offs between cost and environment performances should be a future extension of this work.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19034938
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191008112916.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2019 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.020 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30366314
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Fan, Yee Van $u Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory - SPIL, NETME Centre, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology - VUT Brno, Technická 2896/2, 616 69, Brno, Czech Republic. Electronic address: fan@fme.vutbr.cz.
245    10
$a Anaerobic digestion of lignocellulosic waste: Environmental impact and economic assessment / $c YV. Fan, JJ. Klemeš, S. Perry, CT. Lee,
520    9_
$a Lignocellulosic waste (LW) is abundant in availability and is one of the suitable substrates for anaerobic digestion (AD). However, it is a complex solid substrate matrix that hinders the hydrolysis stage of anaerobic digestion. This study assessed various pre-treatment and post-treatments of lignocellulosic waste for anaerobic digestion benefiting from advanced P-graph and GaBi software (Thinkstep, Germany) from the perspective of cost and environmental performances (global warming potential, human toxicity, ozone depletion potential, particulate matter, photochemical oxidant creation, acidification and eutrophication potential). CaO pre-treatment (P4), H2S removal with membrane separation post-treatment (HSR MS) and without the composting of digestate is identified as the cost-optimal pathway. The biological (P7- Enzyme, P8- Microbial Consortium) and physical (P1- Grinding, P2- Steam Explosion, P3- Water Vapour) pre-treatments alternatives have lower environmental impacts than chemical pre-treatments (P4- CaO, P5- NaOH, P6- H2SO4) however they are not part of the near cost optimal solutions. For post-treatment, the near cost optimal alternatives are H2S removal with organic physical scrubbing (HSR OPS) and H2S removal with amine scrubbing (HSR AS). HSR AS has a better performance in the overall environmental impacts followed by HSR MS and HSR OPS. In general, the suggested cost-optimal solution is still having relatively lower environmental impacts and feasible for implementation (cost effective). There is very complicated to find a universal AD solution. Different scenarios (the type of substrate, the scale, product demand, policies) have different constraints and consequently solutions. The trade-offs between cost and environment performances should be a future extension of this work.
650    _2
$a anaerobióza $7 D000693
650    _2
$a životní prostředí $7 D004777
650    12
$a lignin $7 D008031
650    12
$a odpadky - odstraňování $7 D012037
650    _2
$a tuhý odpad $7 D062611
651    _2
$a Německo $7 D005858
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Klemeš, Jiří Jaromír $u Sustainable Process Integration Laboratory - SPIL, NETME Centre, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Brno University of Technology - VUT Brno, Technická 2896/2, 616 69, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Perry, Simon $u Centre for Process Integration, School of Chemical Engineering and Analytical Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Lee, Chew Tin $u Department of Bioprocess Engineering, Faculty of Chemical and Energy Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), 81310, UTM, Johor Bahru, Johor, Malaysia.
773    0_
$w MED00002657 $t Journal of environmental management $x 1095-8630 $g Roč. 231, č. - (2019), s. 352-363
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30366314 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191008113332 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1451598 $s 1073488
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 231 $c - $d 352-363 $e 20181024 $i 1095-8630 $m Journal of environmental management $n J Environ Manage $x MED00002657
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...