Detail
Článek
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Thrombus Aspiration in Patients With High Thrombus Burden in the TOTAL Trial

SS. Jolly, JA. Cairns, S. Lavi, WJ. Cantor, I. Bernat, AN. Cheema, R. Moreno, S. Kedev, G. Stankovic, SV. Rao, B. Meeks, S. Chowdhary, P. Gao, M. Sibbald, JL. Velianou, SR. Mehta, M. Tsang, T. Sheth, V. Džavík, TOTAL Investigators,

. 2018 ; 72 (14) : 1589-1596. [pub] 20181002

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19034991

BACKGROUND: Routine thrombus aspiration in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) does not improve clinical outcomes. However, there is remaining uncertainty about the potential benefit in those patients with high thrombus burden, where there is a biological rationale for greater benefit. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefit of thrombus aspiration among STEMI patients with high thrombus burden. METHODS: TOTAL (ThrOmbecTomy with PCI vs. PCI ALone in patients with STEMI) was a randomized trial of routine manual thrombectomy versus PCI alone in patients with STEMI (n = 10,732). High thrombus burden (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction thrombus grade ≥3) was a pre-specified subgroup. RESULTS: The primary outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death, MI, cardiogenic shock, or heart failure was not different at 1 year with thrombus aspiration in patients with high thrombus burden (8.1% vs. 8.3% thrombus aspiration; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84 to 1.13) or low thrombus burden (6.0% vs. 5.0% thrombus aspiration; HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.73 to 2.05; interaction p = 0.41). However, among patients with high thrombus burden, stroke at 30 days was more frequent with thrombus aspiration (31 [0.7%] thrombus aspiration vs. 16 [0.4%] PCI alone, HR: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.04 to 3.48). In the high thrombus burden group, thrombus aspiration did not significantly improve CV mortality at 30 days (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.01; p = 0.06) and at 1 year (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.72 to 1.09; p = 0.25). Irrespective of treatment assignment, high thrombus burden was an independent predictor of death (HR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.05 to 3.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with high thrombus burden, routine thrombus aspiration did not improve outcomes at 1 year and was associated with an increased rate of stroke. High thrombus burden is still an important predictor of outcome in STEMI. (A Trial of routine aspiration ThrOmbecTomy with PCI vs. PCI ALone in patients with STEMI [TOTAL]; NCT01149044).

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19034991
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191008110840.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.047 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30261959
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Jolly, Sanjit S $u Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, McMaster University and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: sanjit.jolly@phri.ca.
245    10
$a Thrombus Aspiration in Patients With High Thrombus Burden in the TOTAL Trial / $c SS. Jolly, JA. Cairns, S. Lavi, WJ. Cantor, I. Bernat, AN. Cheema, R. Moreno, S. Kedev, G. Stankovic, SV. Rao, B. Meeks, S. Chowdhary, P. Gao, M. Sibbald, JL. Velianou, SR. Mehta, M. Tsang, T. Sheth, V. Džavík, TOTAL Investigators,
520    9_
$a BACKGROUND: Routine thrombus aspiration in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) does not improve clinical outcomes. However, there is remaining uncertainty about the potential benefit in those patients with high thrombus burden, where there is a biological rationale for greater benefit. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefit of thrombus aspiration among STEMI patients with high thrombus burden. METHODS: TOTAL (ThrOmbecTomy with PCI vs. PCI ALone in patients with STEMI) was a randomized trial of routine manual thrombectomy versus PCI alone in patients with STEMI (n = 10,732). High thrombus burden (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction thrombus grade ≥3) was a pre-specified subgroup. RESULTS: The primary outcome of cardiovascular (CV) death, MI, cardiogenic shock, or heart failure was not different at 1 year with thrombus aspiration in patients with high thrombus burden (8.1% vs. 8.3% thrombus aspiration; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.84 to 1.13) or low thrombus burden (6.0% vs. 5.0% thrombus aspiration; HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.73 to 2.05; interaction p = 0.41). However, among patients with high thrombus burden, stroke at 30 days was more frequent with thrombus aspiration (31 [0.7%] thrombus aspiration vs. 16 [0.4%] PCI alone, HR: 1.90; 95% CI: 1.04 to 3.48). In the high thrombus burden group, thrombus aspiration did not significantly improve CV mortality at 30 days (HR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.61 to 1.01; p = 0.06) and at 1 year (HR: 0.88; 95% CI: 0.72 to 1.09; p = 0.25). Irrespective of treatment assignment, high thrombus burden was an independent predictor of death (HR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.05 to 3.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with high thrombus burden, routine thrombus aspiration did not improve outcomes at 1 year and was associated with an increased rate of stroke. High thrombus burden is still an important predictor of outcome in STEMI. (A Trial of routine aspiration ThrOmbecTomy with PCI vs. PCI ALone in patients with STEMI [TOTAL]; NCT01149044).
650    _2
$a koronární trombóza $x epidemiologie $x terapie $7 D003328
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a srdeční selhání $x epidemiologie $7 D006333
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    12
$a koronární angioplastika $7 D062645
650    _2
$a recidiva $7 D012008
650    _2
$a infarkt myokardu s elevacemi ST úseků $x epidemiologie $x terapie $7 D000072657
650    _2
$a kardiogenní šok $x epidemiologie $7 D012770
650    _2
$a cévní mozková příhoda $x epidemiologie $7 D020521
650    12
$a trombektomie $7 D017131
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
655    _2
$a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Cairns, John A $u Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
700    1_
$a Lavi, Shahar $u Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Western University, London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
700    1_
$a Cantor, Warren J $u Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Southlake Regional Health Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
700    1_
$a Bernat, Ivo $u University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine Pilsen, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Cheema, Asim N $u Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
700    1_
$a Moreno, Raul $u Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
700    1_
$a Kedev, Sasko $u University Clinic of Cardiology, Sts. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Macedonia.
700    1_
$a Stankovic, Goran $u Clinical Center of Serbia, Department of Cardiology, Medical Faculty, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia.
700    1_
$a Rao, Sunil V $u Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
700    1_
$a Meeks, Brandi $u Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, McMaster University and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
700    1_
$a Chowdhary, Saqib $u Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University Hospitals South Manchester, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, United Kingdom.
700    1_
$a Gao, Peggy $u Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, McMaster University and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
700    1_
$a Sibbald, Matthew $u Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, McMaster University and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
700    1_
$a Velianou, James L $u Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, McMaster University and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
700    1_
$a Mehta, Shamir R $u Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, McMaster University and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
700    1_
$a Tsang, Michael $u Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, McMaster University and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
700    1_
$a Sheth, Tej $u Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, McMaster University and Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
700    1_
$a Džavík, Vladimír $u Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
710    2_
$a TOTAL Investigators
773    0_
$w MED00002964 $t Journal of the American College of Cardiology $x 1558-3597 $g Roč. 72, č. 14 (2018), s. 1589-1596
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30261959 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191008111256 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1451651 $s 1073541
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 72 $c 14 $d 1589-1596 $e 20181002 $i 1558-3597 $m Journal of the American College of Cardiology $n J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. $x MED00002964
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...