-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Experimental reconstruction of an abdominal wall defect with electrospun polycaprolactone-ureidopyrimidinone mesh conserves compliance yet may have insufficient strength
L. Hympanova, MGMC. Mori da Cunha, R. Rynkevic, RA. Wach, AK. Olejnik, PYW. Dankers, B. Arts, T. Mes, AW. Bosman, M. Albersen, J. Deprest,
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
- MeSH
- břišní stěna chirurgie MeSH
- chirurgické síťky * MeSH
- elektřina * MeSH
- králíci MeSH
- krysa rodu rattus MeSH
- mechanické jevy * MeSH
- polyestery chemie MeSH
- pyrimidinony chemie MeSH
- testování materiálů MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- králíci MeSH
- krysa rodu rattus MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
PURPOSE: Electrospun meshes mimic the extracellular matrix, which may improve their integration. We aimed to compare polycaprolactone (PCL) modified with ureidopyrimidinone (UPy) electrospun meshes with ultra-lightweight polypropylene (PP; Restorelle) reference textile meshes for in vivo compliance. We chose UPy-PCL because we have shown it does not compromise biomechanical properties of native tissue, and because it potentially can be bioactivated. METHODS: We performed ex vivo biomechanical cyclic loading in wet conditions and in vivo overlay of full-thickness abdominal wall defects in rats and rabbits. Animals were sacrificed at 7, 42 and 54 days (rats; n = 6/group) and 30 and 90 days (rabbits; n = 3/group). Outcomes were herniation, mesh degradation and mesh dimensions, explant compliance and histology. High failure rates prompted us to provide additional material strength by increasing fiber diameter and mesh thickness, which was further tested in rabbits as a biomechanically more challenging model. RESULTS: Compliance was tested in animals without herniation. In both species, UPy-PCL-explants were as compliant as native tissue. In rats, PP-explants were stiffer. Contraction was similar in UPy-PCL and PP-explants. However, UPy-PCL-meshes macroscopically degraded from 30 days onwards, coinciding with herniation in up to half of animals. Increased fiber and mesh thickness did not improve outcome. Degradation of UPy-PCL is associated with an abundance of foreign body giant cells until UPy-PCL disappears. CONCLUSION: Abdominal wall reconstruction with electrospun UPy-PCL meshes failed in 50%. Degradation coincided with a transient vigorous foreign body reaction. Non-failing UPy-PCL-explants were as compliant as native tissue. Despite that, the high failure rate forces us to explore electrospun meshes based on other polymers.
Department of Urology University Hospitals Leuven UZ Herestraat 49 box 7003 41 3000 Leuven Belgium
Pelvic Floor Unit University Hospitals KU Leuven UZ Herestraat 49 box 7003 06 3000 Leuven Belgium
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19035017
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20191014125552.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 191007s2018 ne f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2018.08.026 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30216933
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a ne
- 100 1_
- $a Hympanova, Lucie $u Centre for Surgical Technologies, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, UZ Herestraat 49 - box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, Woman and Child, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, UZ Herestraat 49 - box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Institute for the Care of Mother and Child, Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Podolské nábřeží 157/36, 147 00 Prague, Czech Republic. Electronic address: lucie.hympanova@upmd.eu.
- 245 10
- $a Experimental reconstruction of an abdominal wall defect with electrospun polycaprolactone-ureidopyrimidinone mesh conserves compliance yet may have insufficient strength / $c L. Hympanova, MGMC. Mori da Cunha, R. Rynkevic, RA. Wach, AK. Olejnik, PYW. Dankers, B. Arts, T. Mes, AW. Bosman, M. Albersen, J. Deprest,
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE: Electrospun meshes mimic the extracellular matrix, which may improve their integration. We aimed to compare polycaprolactone (PCL) modified with ureidopyrimidinone (UPy) electrospun meshes with ultra-lightweight polypropylene (PP; Restorelle) reference textile meshes for in vivo compliance. We chose UPy-PCL because we have shown it does not compromise biomechanical properties of native tissue, and because it potentially can be bioactivated. METHODS: We performed ex vivo biomechanical cyclic loading in wet conditions and in vivo overlay of full-thickness abdominal wall defects in rats and rabbits. Animals were sacrificed at 7, 42 and 54 days (rats; n = 6/group) and 30 and 90 days (rabbits; n = 3/group). Outcomes were herniation, mesh degradation and mesh dimensions, explant compliance and histology. High failure rates prompted us to provide additional material strength by increasing fiber diameter and mesh thickness, which was further tested in rabbits as a biomechanically more challenging model. RESULTS: Compliance was tested in animals without herniation. In both species, UPy-PCL-explants were as compliant as native tissue. In rats, PP-explants were stiffer. Contraction was similar in UPy-PCL and PP-explants. However, UPy-PCL-meshes macroscopically degraded from 30 days onwards, coinciding with herniation in up to half of animals. Increased fiber and mesh thickness did not improve outcome. Degradation of UPy-PCL is associated with an abundance of foreign body giant cells until UPy-PCL disappears. CONCLUSION: Abdominal wall reconstruction with electrospun UPy-PCL meshes failed in 50%. Degradation coincided with a transient vigorous foreign body reaction. Non-failing UPy-PCL-explants were as compliant as native tissue. Despite that, the high failure rate forces us to explore electrospun meshes based on other polymers.
- 650 _2
- $a břišní stěna $x chirurgie $7 D034861
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a elektřina $7 D004560
- 650 _2
- $a testování materiálů $7 D008422
- 650 12
- $a mechanické jevy $7 D055595
- 650 _2
- $a polyestery $x chemie $7 D011091
- 650 _2
- $a pyrimidinony $x chemie $7 D011744
- 650 _2
- $a králíci $7 D011817
- 650 _2
- $a krysa rodu Rattus $7 D051381
- 650 12
- $a chirurgické síťky $7 D013526
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Mori da Cunha, Marina Gabriela Monteiro Carvalho $u Centre for Surgical Technologies, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, UZ Herestraat 49 - box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, Woman and Child, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, UZ Herestraat 49 - box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: marina.cunha@kuleuven.be.
- 700 1_
- $a Rynkevic, Rita $u Centre for Surgical Technologies, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, UZ Herestraat 49 - box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, Woman and Child, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, UZ Herestraat 49 - box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; INEGI, Faculdade de Engenharia da Universidade do Porto, Universidade do Porto, Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 400 4200-465 Porto, Portugal. Electronic address: rita.rynkevic@kuleuven.be.
- 700 1_
- $a Wach, Radoslaw A $u Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Technical University of Lodz, Stefana Żeromskiego 116, 90-924 Lodz, Poland. Electronic address: wach@mitr.p.lodz.pl.
- 700 1_
- $a Olejnik, Alicja K $u Institute of Applied Radiation Chemistry, Faculty of Chemistry, Technical University of Lodz, Stefana Żeromskiego 116, 90-924 Lodz, Poland. Electronic address: olejnik@mitr.p.lodz.pl.
- 700 1_
- $a Dankers, Patricia Y W $u Laboratory of Macromolecular and Organic Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, the Netherlands. Electronic address: P.Y.W.Dankers@tue.nl.
- 700 1_
- $a Arts, Boris $u Laboratory of Macromolecular and Organic Chemistry, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, the Netherlands. Electronic address: b.arts@student.tue.nl.
- 700 1_
- $a Mes, Tristan $u SupraPolix BV, Horsten 1, 5612 AX Eindhoven, the Netherlands. Electronic address: mes@suprapolix.com.
- 700 1_
- $a Bosman, Anton W $u SupraPolix BV, Horsten 1, 5612 AX Eindhoven, the Netherlands. Electronic address: bosman@suprapolix.com.
- 700 1_
- $a Albersen, Maarten $u Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, UZ Herestraat 49 - box 7003 41, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: maarten.albersen@uzleuven.be.
- 700 1_
- $a Deprest, Jan $u Centre for Surgical Technologies, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, UZ Herestraat 49 - box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Department of Development and Regeneration, Woman and Child, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, UZ Herestraat 49 - box 7003, 3000 Leuven, Belgium; Pelvic Floor Unit, University Hospitals KU Leuven, UZ Herestraat 49 - box 7003 06, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: Jan.Deprest@uzleuven.be.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00166961 $t Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials $x 1878-0180 $g Roč. 88, č. - (2018), s. 431-441
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30216933 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20191007 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20191014130017 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1451677 $s 1073567
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 88 $c - $d 431-441 $e 20180821 $i 1878-0180 $m Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials $n J Mech Behav Biomed Mater $x MED00166961
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20191007