-
Something wrong with this record ?
Small genome separates native and invasive populations in an ecologically important cosmopolitan grass
P. Pyšek, H. Skálová, J. Čuda, WY. Guo, J. Suda, J. Doležal, O. Kauzál, C. Lambertini, M. Lučanová, T. Mandáková, L. Moravcová, K. Pyšková, H. Brix, LA. Meyerson,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
29313970
DOI
10.1002/ecy.2068
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Phenotype MeSH
- Poaceae genetics MeSH
- Aphids * MeSH
- Plants MeSH
- Introduced Species MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Geographicals
- North America MeSH
The literature suggests that small genomes promote invasion in plants, but little is known about the interaction of genome size with other traits or about the role of genome size during different phases of the invasion process. By intercontinental comparison of native and invasive populations of the common reed Phragmites australis, we revealed a distinct relationship between genome size and invasiveness at the intraspecific level. Monoploid genome size was the only significant variable that clearly separated the North American native plants from those of European origin. The mean Cx value (the amount of DNA in one chromosome set) for source European native populations was 0.490 ± 0.007 (mean ± SD), for North American invasive 0.506 ± 0.020, and for North American native 0.543 ± 0.021. Relative to native populations, the European populations that successfully invaded North America had a smaller genome that was associated with plant traits favoring invasiveness (long rhizomes, early emerging abundant shoots, resistance to aphid attack, and low C:N ratio). The knowledge that invasive populations within species can be identified based on genome size can be applied to screen potentially invasive populations of Phragmites in other parts of the world where they could grow in mixed stands with native plants, as well as to other plant species with intraspecific variation in invasion potential. Moreover, as small genomes are better equipped to respond to extreme environmental conditions such as drought, the mechanism reported here may represent an emerging driver for future invasions and range expansions.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19035450
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20191010123850.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 191007s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/ecy.2068 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29313970
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Pyšek, Petr $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Small genome separates native and invasive populations in an ecologically important cosmopolitan grass / $c P. Pyšek, H. Skálová, J. Čuda, WY. Guo, J. Suda, J. Doležal, O. Kauzál, C. Lambertini, M. Lučanová, T. Mandáková, L. Moravcová, K. Pyšková, H. Brix, LA. Meyerson,
- 520 9_
- $a The literature suggests that small genomes promote invasion in plants, but little is known about the interaction of genome size with other traits or about the role of genome size during different phases of the invasion process. By intercontinental comparison of native and invasive populations of the common reed Phragmites australis, we revealed a distinct relationship between genome size and invasiveness at the intraspecific level. Monoploid genome size was the only significant variable that clearly separated the North American native plants from those of European origin. The mean Cx value (the amount of DNA in one chromosome set) for source European native populations was 0.490 ± 0.007 (mean ± SD), for North American invasive 0.506 ± 0.020, and for North American native 0.543 ± 0.021. Relative to native populations, the European populations that successfully invaded North America had a smaller genome that was associated with plant traits favoring invasiveness (long rhizomes, early emerging abundant shoots, resistance to aphid attack, and low C:N ratio). The knowledge that invasive populations within species can be identified based on genome size can be applied to screen potentially invasive populations of Phragmites in other parts of the world where they could grow in mixed stands with native plants, as well as to other plant species with intraspecific variation in invasion potential. Moreover, as small genomes are better equipped to respond to extreme environmental conditions such as drought, the mechanism reported here may represent an emerging driver for future invasions and range expansions.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a mšice $7 D001042
- 650 _2
- $a zavlečené druhy $7 D058865
- 650 _2
- $a fenotyp $7 D010641
- 650 _2
- $a rostliny $7 D010944
- 650 _2
- $a lipnicovité $x genetika $7 D006109
- 651 _2
- $a Severní Amerika $7 D009656
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Skálová, Hana $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Čuda, Jan $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Guo, Wen-Yong $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Suda, Jan
- 700 1_
- $a Doležal, Jan $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Museum and Gallery of the Orlické hory Mts, Jiráskova 2, CZ-516 01, Rychnov nad Kněžnou, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kauzál, Ondřej $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Lambertini, Carla $u Department of Bioscience, Faculty of Science, Aarhus University, Ole Worms Alle 1, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
- 700 1_
- $a Lučanová, Magdalena $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ-128 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Mandáková, Terezie $u Plant Cytogenomics Research Group, CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Moravcová, Lenka $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Pyšková, Klára $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Brix, Hans $u Department of Bioscience, Faculty of Science, Aarhus University, Ole Worms Alle 1, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
- 700 1_
- $a Meyerson, Laura A $u Department of Natural Resources Science, The University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, 02881, USA.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00001475 $t Ecology $x 0012-9658 $g Roč. 99, č. 1 (2018), s. 79-90
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29313970 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20191007 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20191010124309 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1452110 $s 1074000
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 99 $c 1 $d 79-90 $e - $i 0012-9658 $m Ecology $n Ecology $x MED00001475
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20191007