• Something wrong with this record ?

Small genome separates native and invasive populations in an ecologically important cosmopolitan grass

P. Pyšek, H. Skálová, J. Čuda, WY. Guo, J. Suda, J. Doležal, O. Kauzál, C. Lambertini, M. Lučanová, T. Mandáková, L. Moravcová, K. Pyšková, H. Brix, LA. Meyerson,

. 2018 ; 99 (1) : 79-90. [pub] -

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

The literature suggests that small genomes promote invasion in plants, but little is known about the interaction of genome size with other traits or about the role of genome size during different phases of the invasion process. By intercontinental comparison of native and invasive populations of the common reed Phragmites australis, we revealed a distinct relationship between genome size and invasiveness at the intraspecific level. Monoploid genome size was the only significant variable that clearly separated the North American native plants from those of European origin. The mean Cx value (the amount of DNA in one chromosome set) for source European native populations was 0.490 ± 0.007 (mean ± SD), for North American invasive 0.506 ± 0.020, and for North American native 0.543 ± 0.021. Relative to native populations, the European populations that successfully invaded North America had a smaller genome that was associated with plant traits favoring invasiveness (long rhizomes, early emerging abundant shoots, resistance to aphid attack, and low C:N ratio). The knowledge that invasive populations within species can be identified based on genome size can be applied to screen potentially invasive populations of Phragmites in other parts of the world where they could grow in mixed stands with native plants, as well as to other plant species with intraspecific variation in invasion potential. Moreover, as small genomes are better equipped to respond to extreme environmental conditions such as drought, the mechanism reported here may represent an emerging driver for future invasions and range expansions.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19035450
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191010123850.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/ecy.2068 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29313970
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Pyšek, Petr $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Small genome separates native and invasive populations in an ecologically important cosmopolitan grass / $c P. Pyšek, H. Skálová, J. Čuda, WY. Guo, J. Suda, J. Doležal, O. Kauzál, C. Lambertini, M. Lučanová, T. Mandáková, L. Moravcová, K. Pyšková, H. Brix, LA. Meyerson,
520    9_
$a The literature suggests that small genomes promote invasion in plants, but little is known about the interaction of genome size with other traits or about the role of genome size during different phases of the invasion process. By intercontinental comparison of native and invasive populations of the common reed Phragmites australis, we revealed a distinct relationship between genome size and invasiveness at the intraspecific level. Monoploid genome size was the only significant variable that clearly separated the North American native plants from those of European origin. The mean Cx value (the amount of DNA in one chromosome set) for source European native populations was 0.490 ± 0.007 (mean ± SD), for North American invasive 0.506 ± 0.020, and for North American native 0.543 ± 0.021. Relative to native populations, the European populations that successfully invaded North America had a smaller genome that was associated with plant traits favoring invasiveness (long rhizomes, early emerging abundant shoots, resistance to aphid attack, and low C:N ratio). The knowledge that invasive populations within species can be identified based on genome size can be applied to screen potentially invasive populations of Phragmites in other parts of the world where they could grow in mixed stands with native plants, as well as to other plant species with intraspecific variation in invasion potential. Moreover, as small genomes are better equipped to respond to extreme environmental conditions such as drought, the mechanism reported here may represent an emerging driver for future invasions and range expansions.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a mšice $7 D001042
650    _2
$a zavlečené druhy $7 D058865
650    _2
$a fenotyp $7 D010641
650    _2
$a rostliny $7 D010944
650    _2
$a lipnicovité $x genetika $7 D006109
651    _2
$a Severní Amerika $7 D009656
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Skálová, Hana $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Čuda, Jan $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Guo, Wen-Yong $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Suda, Jan
700    1_
$a Doležal, Jan $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Museum and Gallery of the Orlické hory Mts, Jiráskova 2, CZ-516 01, Rychnov nad Kněžnou, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kauzál, Ondřej $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Lambertini, Carla $u Department of Bioscience, Faculty of Science, Aarhus University, Ole Worms Alle 1, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Lučanová, Magdalena $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ-128 00, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Mandáková, Terezie $u Plant Cytogenomics Research Group, CEITEC - Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Moravcová, Lenka $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pyšková, Klára $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Ecology, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Viničná 7, CZ-128 44, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Brix, Hans $u Department of Bioscience, Faculty of Science, Aarhus University, Ole Worms Alle 1, DK-8000, Aarhus C, Denmark.
700    1_
$a Meyerson, Laura A $u Department of Natural Resources Science, The University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island, 02881, USA.
773    0_
$w MED00001475 $t Ecology $x 0012-9658 $g Roč. 99, č. 1 (2018), s. 79-90
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29313970 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191010124309 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1452110 $s 1074000
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 99 $c 1 $d 79-90 $e - $i 0012-9658 $m Ecology $n Ecology $x MED00001475
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...