Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Auxin molecular field maps define AUX1 selectivity: many auxin herbicides are not substrates

K. Hoyerova, P. Hosek, M. Quareshy, J. Li, P. Klima, M. Kubes, AA. Yemm, P. Neve, A. Tripathi, MJ. Bennett, RM. Napier,

. 2018 ; 217 (4) : 1625-1639. [pub] 20171219

Language English Country England, Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Persistent link   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19035467

Grant support
BB/G023972/1 Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council - United Kingdom

Developmental responses to auxin are regulated by facilitated uptake and efflux, but detailed molecular understanding of the carrier proteins is incomplete. We have used pharmacological tools to explore the chemical space that defines substrate preferences for the auxin uptake carrier AUX1. Total and partial loss-of-function aux1 mutants were assessed against wild-type for dose-dependent resistance to a range of auxins and analogues. We then developed an auxin accumulation assay with associated mathematical modelling to enumerate accurate IC50 values for a small library of auxin analogues. The structure activity relationship data were analysed using molecular field analyses to create a pharmacophoric atlas of AUX1 substrates. The uptake carrier exhibits a very high level of selectivity towards small substrates including the natural indole-3-acetic acid, and the synthetic auxin 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. No AUX1 activity was observed for herbicides based on benzoic acid (dicamba), pyridinyloxyacetic acid (triclopyr) or the 6-arylpicolinates (halauxifen), and very low affinity was found for picolinic acid-based auxins (picloram) and quinolinecarboxylic acids (quinclorac). The atlas demonstrates why some widely used auxin herbicides are not, or are very poor substrates. We list molecular descriptors for AUX1 substrates and discuss our findings in terms of herbicide resistance management.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19035467
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191014120957.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2018 enk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/nph.14950 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29265374
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a enk
100    1_
$a Hoyerova, Klara $u Institute of Experimental Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojova 263, 165 02, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Auxin molecular field maps define AUX1 selectivity: many auxin herbicides are not substrates / $c K. Hoyerova, P. Hosek, M. Quareshy, J. Li, P. Klima, M. Kubes, AA. Yemm, P. Neve, A. Tripathi, MJ. Bennett, RM. Napier,
520    9_
$a Developmental responses to auxin are regulated by facilitated uptake and efflux, but detailed molecular understanding of the carrier proteins is incomplete. We have used pharmacological tools to explore the chemical space that defines substrate preferences for the auxin uptake carrier AUX1. Total and partial loss-of-function aux1 mutants were assessed against wild-type for dose-dependent resistance to a range of auxins and analogues. We then developed an auxin accumulation assay with associated mathematical modelling to enumerate accurate IC50 values for a small library of auxin analogues. The structure activity relationship data were analysed using molecular field analyses to create a pharmacophoric atlas of AUX1 substrates. The uptake carrier exhibits a very high level of selectivity towards small substrates including the natural indole-3-acetic acid, and the synthetic auxin 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. No AUX1 activity was observed for herbicides based on benzoic acid (dicamba), pyridinyloxyacetic acid (triclopyr) or the 6-arylpicolinates (halauxifen), and very low affinity was found for picolinic acid-based auxins (picloram) and quinolinecarboxylic acids (quinclorac). The atlas demonstrates why some widely used auxin herbicides are not, or are very poor substrates. We list molecular descriptors for AUX1 substrates and discuss our findings in terms of herbicide resistance management.
650    _2
$a kyselina 2,4-dichlorfenoxyoctová $x metabolismus $7 D015084
650    _2
$a Arabidopsis $x metabolismus $7 D017360
650    _2
$a proteiny huseníčku $x metabolismus $7 D029681
650    _2
$a biotest $7 D001681
650    _2
$a herbicidy $x metabolismus $7 D006540
650    _2
$a kyseliny indoloctové $x metabolismus $7 D007210
650    _2
$a indoly $x metabolismus $7 D007211
650    _2
$a inhibiční koncentrace 50 $7 D020128
650    _2
$a biologické modely $7 D008954
650    _2
$a mutace $x genetika $7 D009154
650    _2
$a kořeny rostlin $x růst a vývoj $7 D018517
650    _2
$a semenáček $x růst a vývoj $7 D036226
650    _2
$a substrátová specifita $7 D013379
650    _2
$a tabák $x cytologie $7 D014026
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Hosek, Petr $u Institute of Experimental Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojova 263, 165 02, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Quareshy, Mussa $u School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
700    1_
$a Li, Jun $u Department of Pesticide Science, College of Crop Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Weigang 1, Nanjing, Jiangsu Province, China.
700    1_
$a Klima, Petr $u Institute of Experimental Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojova 263, 165 02, Prague 6, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kubes, Martin $u Institute of Experimental Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Rozvojova 263, 165 02, Prague 6, Czech Republic. Department of Chemical Biology and Genetics, Centre of the Region Haná for Biotechnological and Agricultural Research, Šlechtitelů 241/27, 78371, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Yemm, Antony A $u School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
700    1_
$a Neve, Paul $u Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, UK.
700    1_
$a Tripathi, Ashutosh $u School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
700    1_
$a Bennett, Malcolm J $u Plant Sciences Division and Centre for Plant Integrative Biology, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonnington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, UK.
700    1_
$a Napier, Richard M $u School of Life Sciences, University of Warwick, Gibbet Hill Road, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
773    0_
$w MED00007692 $t The New phytologist $x 1469-8137 $g Roč. 217, č. 4 (2018), s. 1625-1639
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29265374 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191014121421 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1452127 $s 1074017
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 217 $c 4 $d 1625-1639 $e 20171219 $i 1469-8137 $m New phytologist $n New Phytol $x MED00007692
GRA    __
$a BB/G023972/1 $p Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council $2 United Kingdom
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007

Find record

Citation metrics

Archiving options