Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Greenhouse gas emissions from a Cu-contaminated soil remediated by in situ stabilization and phytomanaged by a mixed stand of poplar, willows, and false indigo-bush

M. Šimek, D. Elhottová, M. Mench, L. Giagnoni, P. Nannipieri, G. Renella,

. 2017 ; 19 (11) : 976-984. [pub] 2017Nov02

Language English Country United States

Document type Journal Article

Phytomanagement of trace element-contaminated soils can reduce soil toxicity and restore soil ecological functions, including the soil gas exchange with the atmosphere. We studied the emission rate of the greenhouse gases (GHGs) CO2, CH4, and N2O; the potential CH4 oxidation; denitrification enzyme activity (DEA), and glucose mineralization of a Cu-contaminated soil amended with dolomitic limestone and compost, alone or in combination, after a 2-year phytomanagement with a mixed stand of Populus nigra, Salix viminalis, S. caprea, and Amorpha fruticosa. Soil microbial biomass and microbial community composition after analysis of the phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA) profile were determined. Phytomanagement significantly reduced Cu availability and soil toxicity, increased soil microbial biomass and glucose mineralization capacity, changed the composition of soil microbial communities, and increased the CO2 and N2O emission rates and DEA. Despite such increases, microbial communities were evolving toward less GHG emission per unit of microbial biomass than in untreated soils. Overall, the aided phytostabilization option would allow methanotrophic populations to establish in the remediated soils due to decreased soil toxicity and increased nutrient availability.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19035627
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191014110419.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1080/15226514.2016.1267706 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28165773
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Šimek, M $u a Institute of Soil Biology , Biology Centre CAS , České Budějovice , Czech Republic. b Faculty of Science , University of South Bohemia , České Budějovice , Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Greenhouse gas emissions from a Cu-contaminated soil remediated by in situ stabilization and phytomanaged by a mixed stand of poplar, willows, and false indigo-bush / $c M. Šimek, D. Elhottová, M. Mench, L. Giagnoni, P. Nannipieri, G. Renella,
520    9_
$a Phytomanagement of trace element-contaminated soils can reduce soil toxicity and restore soil ecological functions, including the soil gas exchange with the atmosphere. We studied the emission rate of the greenhouse gases (GHGs) CO2, CH4, and N2O; the potential CH4 oxidation; denitrification enzyme activity (DEA), and glucose mineralization of a Cu-contaminated soil amended with dolomitic limestone and compost, alone or in combination, after a 2-year phytomanagement with a mixed stand of Populus nigra, Salix viminalis, S. caprea, and Amorpha fruticosa. Soil microbial biomass and microbial community composition after analysis of the phospholipid fatty acids (PLFA) profile were determined. Phytomanagement significantly reduced Cu availability and soil toxicity, increased soil microbial biomass and glucose mineralization capacity, changed the composition of soil microbial communities, and increased the CO2 and N2O emission rates and DEA. Despite such increases, microbial communities were evolving toward less GHG emission per unit of microbial biomass than in untreated soils. Overall, the aided phytostabilization option would allow methanotrophic populations to establish in the remediated soils due to decreased soil toxicity and increased nutrient availability.
650    _2
$a atmosféra $7 D001272
650    12
$a biodegradace $7 D001673
650    _2
$a biomasa $7 D018533
650    _2
$a uhličitan vápenatý $7 D002119
650    12
$a měď $7 D003300
650    12
$a Fabaceae $7 D007887
650    12
$a skleníkové plyny $7 D000074382
650    _2
$a hořčík $7 D008274
650    12
$a Populus $7 D032107
650    12
$a Salix $7 D032108
650    _2
$a půda $7 D012987
650    _2
$a půdní mikrobiologie $7 D012988
650    _2
$a stopové prvky $7 D014131
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Elhottová, D $u a Institute of Soil Biology , Biology Centre CAS , České Budějovice , Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Mench, M $u c BIOGECO, INRA , University of Bordeaux , Pessac , France.
700    1_
$a Giagnoni, L $u d Department of Agrifood Production and Environmental Sciences , University of Florence , Florence , Italy.
700    1_
$a Nannipieri, P $u d Department of Agrifood Production and Environmental Sciences , University of Florence , Florence , Italy.
700    1_
$a Renella, G $u d Department of Agrifood Production and Environmental Sciences , University of Florence , Florence , Italy.
773    0_
$w MED00176222 $t International journal of phytoremediation $x 1549-7879 $g Roč. 19, č. 11 (2017), s. 976-984
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28165773 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191014110844 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1452287 $s 1074177
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 19 $c 11 $d 976-984 $e 2017Nov02 $i 1549-7879 $m International journal of phytoremediation $n Int. j. phytoremediat. $x MED00176222
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...