• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Life and death of Picea abies after bark-beetle outbreak: ecological processes driving seedling recruitment

M. Macek, J. Wild, M. Kopecký, J. Červenka, M. Svoboda, J. Zenáhlíková, J. Brůna, R. Mosandl, A. Fischer,

. 2017 ; 27 (1) : 156-167. [pub] -

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19035629

The severity and spatial extent of bark-beetle outbreaks substantially increased in recent decades worldwide. The ongoing controversy about natural forest recovery after these outbreaks highlights the need for individual-based long-term studies, which disentangle processes driving forest regeneration. However, such studies have been lacking. To fill this gap, we followed the fates of 2,552 individual seedlings for 12 years after a large-scale bark-beetle outbreak that caused complete canopy dieback in mountain Norway spruce (Picea abies) forests in southeast Germany. We explore the contribution of advance, disturbance-related, and post-disturbance regeneration to forest recovery. Most seedlings originated directly within the three-year dieback of canopy trees induced by bark-beetle outbreak. After complete canopy dieback, the establishment of new seedlings was minimal. Surprisingly, advance regeneration formed only a minor part of all regeneration. However, because it had the highest survival rate, its importance increased over time. The most important factor influencing the survival of seedlings after disturbance was their height. Survival was further modified by microsite: seedlings established on dead wood survived best, whereas almost all seedlings surrounded by graminoids died. For 5 cm tall seedlings, annual mortality ranged from 20 to 50% according to the rooting microsite. However, for seedlings taller than 50 cm, annual mortality was below 5% at all microsites. While microsite modified seedling mortality, it did not affect seedling height growth. A model of regeneration dynamics based on short-term observations accurately predicts regeneration height growth, but substantially underestimates mortality rate, thus predicting more surviving seedlings than were observed. We found that P. abies forests were able to regenerate naturally even after severe bark-beetle outbreaks owing to advance and particularly disturbance-related regeneration. This, together with microsite-specific mortality, yields structurally and spatially diverse forests. Our study thus highlights the so far unrecognized importance of disturbance-related regeneration for stand recovery after bark-beetle outbreaks.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19035629
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191011110238.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2017 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1002/eap.1429 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)28052495
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Macek, Martin $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Department of Botany, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Benátská 2, CZ-128 01, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Life and death of Picea abies after bark-beetle outbreak: ecological processes driving seedling recruitment / $c M. Macek, J. Wild, M. Kopecký, J. Červenka, M. Svoboda, J. Zenáhlíková, J. Brůna, R. Mosandl, A. Fischer,
520    9_
$a The severity and spatial extent of bark-beetle outbreaks substantially increased in recent decades worldwide. The ongoing controversy about natural forest recovery after these outbreaks highlights the need for individual-based long-term studies, which disentangle processes driving forest regeneration. However, such studies have been lacking. To fill this gap, we followed the fates of 2,552 individual seedlings for 12 years after a large-scale bark-beetle outbreak that caused complete canopy dieback in mountain Norway spruce (Picea abies) forests in southeast Germany. We explore the contribution of advance, disturbance-related, and post-disturbance regeneration to forest recovery. Most seedlings originated directly within the three-year dieback of canopy trees induced by bark-beetle outbreak. After complete canopy dieback, the establishment of new seedlings was minimal. Surprisingly, advance regeneration formed only a minor part of all regeneration. However, because it had the highest survival rate, its importance increased over time. The most important factor influencing the survival of seedlings after disturbance was their height. Survival was further modified by microsite: seedlings established on dead wood survived best, whereas almost all seedlings surrounded by graminoids died. For 5 cm tall seedlings, annual mortality ranged from 20 to 50% according to the rooting microsite. However, for seedlings taller than 50 cm, annual mortality was below 5% at all microsites. While microsite modified seedling mortality, it did not affect seedling height growth. A model of regeneration dynamics based on short-term observations accurately predicts regeneration height growth, but substantially underestimates mortality rate, thus predicting more surviving seedlings than were observed. We found that P. abies forests were able to regenerate naturally even after severe bark-beetle outbreaks owing to advance and particularly disturbance-related regeneration. This, together with microsite-specific mortality, yields structurally and spatially diverse forests. Our study thus highlights the so far unrecognized importance of disturbance-related regeneration for stand recovery after bark-beetle outbreaks.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a brouci $x fyziologie $7 D001517
650    _2
$a lesy $7 D065928
650    12
$a býložravci $7 D060434
650    _2
$a smrk $x fyziologie $7 D028222
650    _2
$a populační dynamika $7 D011157
650    _2
$a semenáček $x fyziologie $7 D036226
651    _2
$a Německo $7 D005858
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Wild, Jan $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21, Prague 6 -, Suchdol, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kopecký, Martin $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21, Prague 6 -, Suchdol, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Červenka, Jaroslav $u Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21, Prague 6 -, Suchdol, Czech Republic. Šumava National Park, 1. máje 260, CZ-385 01, Vimperk, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Svoboda, Miroslav $u Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21, Prague 6 -, Suchdol, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Zenáhlíková, Jitka $u Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Kamýcká 129, CZ-165 21, Prague 6 -, Suchdol, Czech Republic. Šumava National Park, 1. máje 260, CZ-385 01, Vimperk, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Brůna, Josef $u Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Mosandl, Reinhard $u Institute of Silviculture, Technische Universität München TUM, D-85354, Freising, Germany.
700    1_
$a Fischer, Anton $u Geobotany, Department of Ecology and Ecosystem Management, Center of Life and Food Sciences, Technische Universität München TUM, Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Platz 2, D-85354, Freising, Germany.
773    0_
$w MED00158588 $t Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America $x 1051-0761 $g Roč. 27, č. 1 (2017), s. 156-167
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28052495 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191011110658 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1452289 $s 1074179
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2017 $b 27 $c 1 $d 156-167 $e - $i 1051-0761 $m Ecological applications $n Ecol Appl $x MED00158588
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007
Zpět

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Možnosti archivace