Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Improving clinical refractive results of cataract surgery by machine learning

M. Sramka, M. Slovak, J. Tuckova, P. Stodulka,

. 2019 ; 7 (-) : e7202. [pub] 20190702

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19035954

Aim: To evaluate the potential of the Support Vector Machine Regression model (SVM-RM) and Multilayer Neural Network Ensemble model (MLNN-EM) to improve the intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for clinical workflow. Background: Current IOL power calculation methods are limited in their accuracy with the possibility of decreased accuracy especially in eyes with an unusual ocular dimension. In case of an improperly calculated power of the IOL in cataract or refractive lens replacement surgery there is a risk of re-operation or further refractive correction. This may create potential complications and discomfort for the patient. Methods: A dataset containing information about 2,194 eyes was obtained using data mining process from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) system database of the Gemini Eye Clinic. The dataset was optimized and split into the selection set (used in the design for models and training), and the verification set (used in the evaluation). The set of mean prediction errors (PEs) and the distribution of predicted refractive errors were evaluated for both models and clinical results (CR). Results: Both models performed significantly better for the majority of the evaluated parameters compared with the CR. There was no significant difference between both evaluated models. In the ±0.50 D PE category both SVM-RM and MLNN-EM were slightly better than the Barrett Universal II formula, which is often presented as the most accurate calculation formula. Conclusion: In comparison to the current clinical method, both SVM-RM and MLNN-EM have achieved significantly better results in IOL calculations and therefore have a strong potential to improve clinical cataract refractive outcomes.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19035954
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20210310140109.0
007      
ta
008      
191007s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.7717/peerj.7202 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31304064
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Sramka, Martin $u Department of Circuit Theory/Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic. Research and Development Department, Gemini Eye Clinic, Zlin, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Improving clinical refractive results of cataract surgery by machine learning / $c M. Sramka, M. Slovak, J. Tuckova, P. Stodulka,
520    9_
$a Aim: To evaluate the potential of the Support Vector Machine Regression model (SVM-RM) and Multilayer Neural Network Ensemble model (MLNN-EM) to improve the intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation for clinical workflow. Background: Current IOL power calculation methods are limited in their accuracy with the possibility of decreased accuracy especially in eyes with an unusual ocular dimension. In case of an improperly calculated power of the IOL in cataract or refractive lens replacement surgery there is a risk of re-operation or further refractive correction. This may create potential complications and discomfort for the patient. Methods: A dataset containing information about 2,194 eyes was obtained using data mining process from the Electronic Health Record (EHR) system database of the Gemini Eye Clinic. The dataset was optimized and split into the selection set (used in the design for models and training), and the verification set (used in the evaluation). The set of mean prediction errors (PEs) and the distribution of predicted refractive errors were evaluated for both models and clinical results (CR). Results: Both models performed significantly better for the majority of the evaluated parameters compared with the CR. There was no significant difference between both evaluated models. In the ±0.50 D PE category both SVM-RM and MLNN-EM were slightly better than the Barrett Universal II formula, which is often presented as the most accurate calculation formula. Conclusion: In comparison to the current clinical method, both SVM-RM and MLNN-EM have achieved significantly better results in IOL calculations and therefore have a strong potential to improve clinical cataract refractive outcomes.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Slovak, Martin $u Research and Development Department, Gemini Eye Clinic, Zlin, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Tuckova, Jana $u Department of Circuit Theory/Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Stodulka, Pavel $u Research and Development Department, Gemini Eye Clinic, Zlin, Czech Republic. Department of Ophthalmology/Third Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00184567 $t PeerJ $x 2167-8359 $g Roč. 7, č. - (2019), s. e7202
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31304064 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20191007 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20210310140105 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1452614 $s 1074504
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 7 $c - $d e7202 $e 20190702 $i 2167-8359 $m PeerJ $n PeerJ $x MED00184567
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20191007

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...