• Something wrong with this record ?

První zkušenosti s náhradou hlavice radia
[Our initial experience with radial head replacement]

M. Vlček, M. Streck, I. Čižmář, J. Pech, A. Sosna

. 2019 ; 86 (5) : 362-367. [pub] -

Language Czech Country Czech Republic

Document type Journal Article

Digital library NLK
Source

E-resources Online

NLK Free Medical Journals from 2006

Links

PubMed 31748113

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY A single treatment procedure for multi-fragmented non-reconstructible radial head fractures has not been established as of yet. One of the available treatment methods can be the implantation of an endoprosthesis, but there is no consensus in available publications. We therefore decided to trial their use and to obtain our own experience. This study includes the evaluation of the outcomes of treatment at one year postoperatively. MATERIAL AND METHODS Our group included eight patients (six men and two women with the mean age of 46.1 years, ranging from 24 to 80 years) with an implanted ExploR® (Biomet, U.S.A.) radial head endoprosthesis. The radial head fractures were of three to six fragment type, in six cases there was an associated dislocation. In one case, there was a concomitant diaphyseal fracture of the ulna which was stabilised using the Würzburger intramedullary nail (TRUE-Instrumente GmbH, Germany). The surgical approach through Kocher's interval was used in all cases. Fixation using a plaster splint from metacarpophalangeal joints up to the shoulder was applied postoperatively for a period of two to three weeks in all patients. RESULTS The assessment was carried out on average at 13 months (range 12-15 months) after the surgery. The mean elbow flexion was 7.5° to 136.9°, forearm supination was 0° to 86.3° and forearm pronation was 0° to 80.0°. The elbow joint maintained its stability in all cases. Neurological deficit did not develop in any of the patients. The DASH score reached the mean value of 11.2. The mean value of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was 92.5. Radiological signs of implant loosening were observed in three cases. In two of these cases, bone resorption occurred surrounding the stem of endoprosthesis. In two patients, heterotopic ossification were found and in one case, an oversized endoprosthesis head was implanted. No recurrent elbow dislocation was seen in any of the patients. DISCUSSION The application of radial head endoprosthesis is indicated for comminuted radial head fractures and concurrent ligamentous injuries (fracture-dislocations, terrible triad, Essex-Lopresti injuries). Equally good functional outcomes may be achieved with the use of an endoprosthesis as by osteosynthesis. The complications of arthroplasty tend to be late, at ten or more years postoperatively. Further follow-up of our patients will be necessary, along with a further expansion of our group of patients. Complications may be prevented with the use of longer-stem implants and more up-to-date cemented bipolar endoprostheses which, according to recent studies, achieve equally good functional outcomes and reduce the number of necessary revision surgeries - implant removal in particular. CONCLUSIONS In treating the comminuted radial head fractures, the implantation of endoprosthesis helps to achieve a quick restoration of the elbow joint function along with good functional outcomes and prevents instabilities in case of associated ligamentous injuries. A basic precondition for successful treatment is the choice of an adequate size head. The radiological signs of stem loosening do not necessarily have to affect the functional outcomes. Key words: fracture, radial head, endoprosthesis, Kocher approach.

Our initial experience with radial head replacement

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19042051
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20191212100937.0
007      
ta
008      
191205s2019 xr f 000 0|cze||
009      
AR
024    7_
$2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2019/062
035    __
$a (PubMed)31748113
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a cze $b eng
044    __
$a xr
100    1_
$a Vlček, Martin $7 xx0099894 $u Ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha
245    10
$a První zkušenosti s náhradou hlavice radia / $c M. Vlček, M. Streck, I. Čižmář, J. Pech, A. Sosna
246    31
$a Our initial experience with radial head replacement
520    9_
$a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY A single treatment procedure for multi-fragmented non-reconstructible radial head fractures has not been established as of yet. One of the available treatment methods can be the implantation of an endoprosthesis, but there is no consensus in available publications. We therefore decided to trial their use and to obtain our own experience. This study includes the evaluation of the outcomes of treatment at one year postoperatively. MATERIAL AND METHODS Our group included eight patients (six men and two women with the mean age of 46.1 years, ranging from 24 to 80 years) with an implanted ExploR® (Biomet, U.S.A.) radial head endoprosthesis. The radial head fractures were of three to six fragment type, in six cases there was an associated dislocation. In one case, there was a concomitant diaphyseal fracture of the ulna which was stabilised using the Würzburger intramedullary nail (TRUE-Instrumente GmbH, Germany). The surgical approach through Kocher's interval was used in all cases. Fixation using a plaster splint from metacarpophalangeal joints up to the shoulder was applied postoperatively for a period of two to three weeks in all patients. RESULTS The assessment was carried out on average at 13 months (range 12-15 months) after the surgery. The mean elbow flexion was 7.5° to 136.9°, forearm supination was 0° to 86.3° and forearm pronation was 0° to 80.0°. The elbow joint maintained its stability in all cases. Neurological deficit did not develop in any of the patients. The DASH score reached the mean value of 11.2. The mean value of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was 92.5. Radiological signs of implant loosening were observed in three cases. In two of these cases, bone resorption occurred surrounding the stem of endoprosthesis. In two patients, heterotopic ossification were found and in one case, an oversized endoprosthesis head was implanted. No recurrent elbow dislocation was seen in any of the patients. DISCUSSION The application of radial head endoprosthesis is indicated for comminuted radial head fractures and concurrent ligamentous injuries (fracture-dislocations, terrible triad, Essex-Lopresti injuries). Equally good functional outcomes may be achieved with the use of an endoprosthesis as by osteosynthesis. The complications of arthroplasty tend to be late, at ten or more years postoperatively. Further follow-up of our patients will be necessary, along with a further expansion of our group of patients. Complications may be prevented with the use of longer-stem implants and more up-to-date cemented bipolar endoprostheses which, according to recent studies, achieve equally good functional outcomes and reduce the number of necessary revision surgeries - implant removal in particular. CONCLUSIONS In treating the comminuted radial head fractures, the implantation of endoprosthesis helps to achieve a quick restoration of the elbow joint function along with good functional outcomes and prevents instabilities in case of associated ligamentous injuries. A basic precondition for successful treatment is the choice of an adequate size head. The radiological signs of stem loosening do not necessarily have to affect the functional outcomes. Key words: fracture, radial head, endoprosthesis, Kocher approach.
650    _2
$a dospělí $7 D000328
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    12
$a totální endoprotéza loketního kloubu $7 D057929
650    _2
$a loketní kloub $x chirurgie $7 D004551
650    _2
$a protézy lokte $7 D058569
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a vnitřní fixace fraktury $7 D005593
650    _2
$a tříštivé fraktury $x chirurgie $7 D018460
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a fraktury vřetenní kosti $x chirurgie $7 D011885
650    _2
$a rozsah kloubních pohybů $7 D016059
650    _2
$a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
650    _2
$a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
650    _2
$a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Streck, Miroslav $7 xx0228402 $u Ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha
700    1_
$a Čižmář, Igor $7 xx0026818 $u Traumatologická klinika Lékařské fakulty Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci a Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc
700    1_
$a Pech, Jan $7 jn20001227717 $u Ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha
700    1_
$a Sosna, Antonín, $d 1943- $7 jn20000710566 $u Ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha
773    0_
$w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 86, č. 5 (2019), s. 362-367
910    __
$a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0
990    __
$a 20191205 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20191210170032 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1473188 $s 1080693
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 86 $c 5 $d 362-367 $e - $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
LZP    __
$b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20191205

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...