-
Something wrong with this record ?
První zkušenosti s náhradou hlavice radia
[Our initial experience with radial head replacement]
M. Vlček, M. Streck, I. Čižmář, J. Pech, A. Sosna
Language Czech Country Czech Republic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
31748113
- MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Radius Fractures surgery MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Elbow Joint surgery MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Elbow Prosthesis MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Range of Motion, Articular MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Elbow * MeSH
- Fractures, Comminuted surgery MeSH
- Fracture Fixation, Internal MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged, 80 and over MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
PURPOSE OF THE STUDY A single treatment procedure for multi-fragmented non-reconstructible radial head fractures has not been established as of yet. One of the available treatment methods can be the implantation of an endoprosthesis, but there is no consensus in available publications. We therefore decided to trial their use and to obtain our own experience. This study includes the evaluation of the outcomes of treatment at one year postoperatively. MATERIAL AND METHODS Our group included eight patients (six men and two women with the mean age of 46.1 years, ranging from 24 to 80 years) with an implanted ExploR® (Biomet, U.S.A.) radial head endoprosthesis. The radial head fractures were of three to six fragment type, in six cases there was an associated dislocation. In one case, there was a concomitant diaphyseal fracture of the ulna which was stabilised using the Würzburger intramedullary nail (TRUE-Instrumente GmbH, Germany). The surgical approach through Kocher's interval was used in all cases. Fixation using a plaster splint from metacarpophalangeal joints up to the shoulder was applied postoperatively for a period of two to three weeks in all patients. RESULTS The assessment was carried out on average at 13 months (range 12-15 months) after the surgery. The mean elbow flexion was 7.5° to 136.9°, forearm supination was 0° to 86.3° and forearm pronation was 0° to 80.0°. The elbow joint maintained its stability in all cases. Neurological deficit did not develop in any of the patients. The DASH score reached the mean value of 11.2. The mean value of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was 92.5. Radiological signs of implant loosening were observed in three cases. In two of these cases, bone resorption occurred surrounding the stem of endoprosthesis. In two patients, heterotopic ossification were found and in one case, an oversized endoprosthesis head was implanted. No recurrent elbow dislocation was seen in any of the patients. DISCUSSION The application of radial head endoprosthesis is indicated for comminuted radial head fractures and concurrent ligamentous injuries (fracture-dislocations, terrible triad, Essex-Lopresti injuries). Equally good functional outcomes may be achieved with the use of an endoprosthesis as by osteosynthesis. The complications of arthroplasty tend to be late, at ten or more years postoperatively. Further follow-up of our patients will be necessary, along with a further expansion of our group of patients. Complications may be prevented with the use of longer-stem implants and more up-to-date cemented bipolar endoprostheses which, according to recent studies, achieve equally good functional outcomes and reduce the number of necessary revision surgeries - implant removal in particular. CONCLUSIONS In treating the comminuted radial head fractures, the implantation of endoprosthesis helps to achieve a quick restoration of the elbow joint function along with good functional outcomes and prevents instabilities in case of associated ligamentous injuries. A basic precondition for successful treatment is the choice of an adequate size head. The radiological signs of stem loosening do not necessarily have to affect the functional outcomes. Key words: fracture, radial head, endoprosthesis, Kocher approach.
Our initial experience with radial head replacement
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19042051
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20191212100937.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 191205s2019 xr f 000 0|cze||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $2 doi $a 10.55095/achot2019/062
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31748113
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a cze $b eng
- 044 __
- $a xr
- 100 1_
- $a Vlček, Martin $7 xx0099894 $u Ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha
- 245 10
- $a První zkušenosti s náhradou hlavice radia / $c M. Vlček, M. Streck, I. Čižmář, J. Pech, A. Sosna
- 246 31
- $a Our initial experience with radial head replacement
- 520 9_
- $a PURPOSE OF THE STUDY A single treatment procedure for multi-fragmented non-reconstructible radial head fractures has not been established as of yet. One of the available treatment methods can be the implantation of an endoprosthesis, but there is no consensus in available publications. We therefore decided to trial their use and to obtain our own experience. This study includes the evaluation of the outcomes of treatment at one year postoperatively. MATERIAL AND METHODS Our group included eight patients (six men and two women with the mean age of 46.1 years, ranging from 24 to 80 years) with an implanted ExploR® (Biomet, U.S.A.) radial head endoprosthesis. The radial head fractures were of three to six fragment type, in six cases there was an associated dislocation. In one case, there was a concomitant diaphyseal fracture of the ulna which was stabilised using the Würzburger intramedullary nail (TRUE-Instrumente GmbH, Germany). The surgical approach through Kocher's interval was used in all cases. Fixation using a plaster splint from metacarpophalangeal joints up to the shoulder was applied postoperatively for a period of two to three weeks in all patients. RESULTS The assessment was carried out on average at 13 months (range 12-15 months) after the surgery. The mean elbow flexion was 7.5° to 136.9°, forearm supination was 0° to 86.3° and forearm pronation was 0° to 80.0°. The elbow joint maintained its stability in all cases. Neurological deficit did not develop in any of the patients. The DASH score reached the mean value of 11.2. The mean value of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) was 92.5. Radiological signs of implant loosening were observed in three cases. In two of these cases, bone resorption occurred surrounding the stem of endoprosthesis. In two patients, heterotopic ossification were found and in one case, an oversized endoprosthesis head was implanted. No recurrent elbow dislocation was seen in any of the patients. DISCUSSION The application of radial head endoprosthesis is indicated for comminuted radial head fractures and concurrent ligamentous injuries (fracture-dislocations, terrible triad, Essex-Lopresti injuries). Equally good functional outcomes may be achieved with the use of an endoprosthesis as by osteosynthesis. The complications of arthroplasty tend to be late, at ten or more years postoperatively. Further follow-up of our patients will be necessary, along with a further expansion of our group of patients. Complications may be prevented with the use of longer-stem implants and more up-to-date cemented bipolar endoprostheses which, according to recent studies, achieve equally good functional outcomes and reduce the number of necessary revision surgeries - implant removal in particular. CONCLUSIONS In treating the comminuted radial head fractures, the implantation of endoprosthesis helps to achieve a quick restoration of the elbow joint function along with good functional outcomes and prevents instabilities in case of associated ligamentous injuries. A basic precondition for successful treatment is the choice of an adequate size head. The radiological signs of stem loosening do not necessarily have to affect the functional outcomes. Key words: fracture, radial head, endoprosthesis, Kocher approach.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
- 650 12
- $a totální endoprotéza loketního kloubu $7 D057929
- 650 _2
- $a loketní kloub $x chirurgie $7 D004551
- 650 _2
- $a protézy lokte $7 D058569
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a vnitřní fixace fraktury $7 D005593
- 650 _2
- $a tříštivé fraktury $x chirurgie $7 D018460
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a fraktury vřetenní kosti $x chirurgie $7 D011885
- 650 _2
- $a rozsah kloubních pohybů $7 D016059
- 650 _2
- $a retrospektivní studie $7 D012189
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Streck, Miroslav $7 xx0228402 $u Ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha
- 700 1_
- $a Čižmář, Igor $7 xx0026818 $u Traumatologická klinika Lékařské fakulty Univerzity Palackého v Olomouci a Fakultní nemocnice Olomouc
- 700 1_
- $a Pech, Jan $7 jn20001227717 $u Ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha
- 700 1_
- $a Sosna, Antonín, $d 1943- $7 jn20000710566 $u Ortopedická klinika 1. lékařské fakulty Univerzity Karlovy a Fakultní nemocnice v Motole, Praha
- 773 0_
- $w MED00011021 $t Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $x 0001-5415 $g Roč. 86, č. 5 (2019), s. 362-367
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b A 8 $c 507 $y p $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20191205 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20191210170032 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1473188 $s 1080693
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 86 $c 5 $d 362-367 $e - $i 0001-5415 $m Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Čechoslovaca $n Acta chir. orthop. traumatol. Čechoslovaca $x MED00011021
- LZP __
- $b NLK118 $a Pubmed-20191205