• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Testing the impact of Whole Genome Amplification on genome comparison using the polyploid flagellated Giardia duodenalis as a model

F. Weisz, M. Lalle, E. Nohynkova, AR. Sannella, J. Dluhošová, SM. Cacciò,

. 2019 ; 207 (-) : 107776. [pub] 20191016

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19044503

The availability of high quality genomic DNA in sufficient amounts to perform Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) experiments is challenging for pathogens that cannot be cultivated in vitro, as is the case for many parasites. Therefore, Whole Genome Amplification (WGA) of genomic DNA is used to overcome this limitation. In this study, we evaluated the effect of WGA using the intestinal flagellated protozoan Giardia duodenalis as a model, due to its genome compactness (12 Mb), the presence of two diploid nuclei with variable levels of allelic sequence heterogeneity (ASH), and the availability of reference genomes. We selected one isolate (ZX15) belonging to the same genetic group of the reference isolate WB, namely Assemblage A, sub-Assemblage AI. Genomic DNA from the ZX15 isolate (GEN dataset) and that obtained by WGA of 1 ng of the same genomic DNA (WGA dataset) were sequenced on a HiSeq Illumina platform. Trimmed reads from the GEN and WGA experiments were mapped against the WB reference genome, showing the presence of a very small number of mutations (846 and 752, respectively). The difference in the number of mutations is largely accounted by local variation in coverage and not by bias introduced by WGA. No significant difference were observed in the distribution of mutations in coding and non-coding regions, in the proportion of heterozygous mutations (ASH), or in the transition/transversion ratio of Single Nucleotide Variants within coding sequences. We conclude that the quantitative and qualitative impact of WGA on the identification of mutations is limited, and that this technique can be used to conduct comparative genomics studies.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19044503
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200114083412.0
007      
ta
008      
200109s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1016/j.exppara.2019.107776 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31628895
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Weisz, Filip $u Institute of Immunology and Microbiology, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
245    10
$a Testing the impact of Whole Genome Amplification on genome comparison using the polyploid flagellated Giardia duodenalis as a model / $c F. Weisz, M. Lalle, E. Nohynkova, AR. Sannella, J. Dluhošová, SM. Cacciò,
520    9_
$a The availability of high quality genomic DNA in sufficient amounts to perform Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) experiments is challenging for pathogens that cannot be cultivated in vitro, as is the case for many parasites. Therefore, Whole Genome Amplification (WGA) of genomic DNA is used to overcome this limitation. In this study, we evaluated the effect of WGA using the intestinal flagellated protozoan Giardia duodenalis as a model, due to its genome compactness (12 Mb), the presence of two diploid nuclei with variable levels of allelic sequence heterogeneity (ASH), and the availability of reference genomes. We selected one isolate (ZX15) belonging to the same genetic group of the reference isolate WB, namely Assemblage A, sub-Assemblage AI. Genomic DNA from the ZX15 isolate (GEN dataset) and that obtained by WGA of 1 ng of the same genomic DNA (WGA dataset) were sequenced on a HiSeq Illumina platform. Trimmed reads from the GEN and WGA experiments were mapped against the WB reference genome, showing the presence of a very small number of mutations (846 and 752, respectively). The difference in the number of mutations is largely accounted by local variation in coverage and not by bias introduced by WGA. No significant difference were observed in the distribution of mutations in coding and non-coding regions, in the proportion of heterozygous mutations (ASH), or in the transition/transversion ratio of Single Nucleotide Variants within coding sequences. We conclude that the quantitative and qualitative impact of WGA on the identification of mutations is limited, and that this technique can be used to conduct comparative genomics studies.
650    _2
$a předškolní dítě $7 D002675
650    _2
$a výpočetní biologie $7 D019295
650    _2
$a protozoální DNA $x chemie $x genetika $x izolace a purifikace $7 D016054
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a celogenomová asociační studie $7 D055106
650    _2
$a strukturální variace genomu $7 D056914
650    _2
$a Giardia lamblia $x genetika $7 D016829
650    _2
$a giardiáza $x parazitologie $7 D005873
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a mutace $7 D009154
650    _2
$a techniky amplifikace nukleových kyselin $7 D021141
650    _2
$a otevřené čtecí rámce $x genetika $7 D016366
651    _2
$a Česká republika $7 D018153
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Lalle, Marco $u Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
700    1_
$a Nohynkova, Eva $u Institute of Immunology and Microbiology, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sannella, Anna Rosa $u Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
700    1_
$a Dluhošová, Jana $u Institute of Immunology and Microbiology, First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Cacciò, Simone M $u Department of Infectious Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy. Electronic address: simone.caccio@iss.it.
773    0_
$w MED00001750 $t Experimental parasitology $x 1090-2449 $g Roč. 207, č. - (2019), s. 107776
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31628895 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200114083744 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1482772 $s 1083176
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 207 $c - $d 107776 $e 20191016 $i 1090-2449 $m Experimental parasitology $n Exp Parasitol $x MED00001750
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200109

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...