-
Something wrong with this record ?
Contact with adult hen affects development of caecal microbiota in newly hatched chicks
T. Kubasova, M. Kollarcikova, M. Crhanova, D. Karasova, D. Cejkova, A. Sebkova, J. Matiasovicova, M. Faldynova, A. Pokorna, A. Cizek, I. Rychlik,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
from 2006
Free Medical Journals
from 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
from 2006
PubMed Central
from 2006
Europe PubMed Central
from 2006
ProQuest Central
from 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-10-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
from 2006-01-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
from 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
from 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
from 2006
- MeSH
- Bacteria * classification genetics growth & development isolation & purification MeSH
- Cecum microbiology MeSH
- Chickens microbiology MeSH
- Gastrointestinal Microbiome * MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
Chickens in commercial production are hatched in a clean hatchery environment in the absence of any contact with adult hens. However, Gallus gallus evolved to be hatched in a nest in contact with an adult hen which may act as a donor of gut microbiota. In this study, we therefore addressed the issue of microbiota development in newly hatched chickens with or without contact with an adult hen. We found that a mere 24-hour-long contact between a hen and newly hatched chickens was long enough for transfer of hen gut microbiota to chickens. Hens were efficient donors of Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria. However, except for genus Faecalibacterium and bacterial species belonging to class Negativicutes, hens did not act as an important source of Gram-positive Firmicutes. Though common to the chicken intestinal tract, Lactobacilli and isolates from families Erysipelotrichaceae, Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae therefore originated from environmental sources instead of from the hens. These observation may have considerable consequences for the evidence-based design of the new generation of probiotics for poultry.
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19044952
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200113081520.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200109s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0212446 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30840648
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Kubasova, Tereza $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Contact with adult hen affects development of caecal microbiota in newly hatched chicks / $c T. Kubasova, M. Kollarcikova, M. Crhanova, D. Karasova, D. Cejkova, A. Sebkova, J. Matiasovicova, M. Faldynova, A. Pokorna, A. Cizek, I. Rychlik,
- 520 9_
- $a Chickens in commercial production are hatched in a clean hatchery environment in the absence of any contact with adult hens. However, Gallus gallus evolved to be hatched in a nest in contact with an adult hen which may act as a donor of gut microbiota. In this study, we therefore addressed the issue of microbiota development in newly hatched chickens with or without contact with an adult hen. We found that a mere 24-hour-long contact between a hen and newly hatched chickens was long enough for transfer of hen gut microbiota to chickens. Hens were efficient donors of Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria. However, except for genus Faecalibacterium and bacterial species belonging to class Negativicutes, hens did not act as an important source of Gram-positive Firmicutes. Though common to the chicken intestinal tract, Lactobacilli and isolates from families Erysipelotrichaceae, Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae therefore originated from environmental sources instead of from the hens. These observation may have considerable consequences for the evidence-based design of the new generation of probiotics for poultry.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a Bacteria $x klasifikace $x genetika $x růst a vývoj $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001419
- 650 _2
- $a cékum $x mikrobiologie $7 D002432
- 650 _2
- $a kur domácí $x mikrobiologie $7 D002645
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a střevní mikroflóra $7 D000069196
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kollarcikova, Miloslava $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Crhanova, Magdalena $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Karasova, Daniela $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Cejkova, Darina $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sebkova, Alena $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Matiasovicova, Jitka $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Faldynova, Marcela $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Pokorna, Alexandra $u Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Cizek, Alois $u Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Rychlik, Ivan $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 14, č. 3 (2019), s. e0212446
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30840648 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200113081852 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1483221 $s 1083625
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 14 $c 3 $d e0212446 $e 20190306 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200109