Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Contact with adult hen affects development of caecal microbiota in newly hatched chicks

T. Kubasova, M. Kollarcikova, M. Crhanova, D. Karasova, D. Cejkova, A. Sebkova, J. Matiasovicova, M. Faldynova, A. Pokorna, A. Cizek, I. Rychlik,

. 2019 ; 14 (3) : e0212446. [pub] 20190306

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19044952

Chickens in commercial production are hatched in a clean hatchery environment in the absence of any contact with adult hens. However, Gallus gallus evolved to be hatched in a nest in contact with an adult hen which may act as a donor of gut microbiota. In this study, we therefore addressed the issue of microbiota development in newly hatched chickens with or without contact with an adult hen. We found that a mere 24-hour-long contact between a hen and newly hatched chickens was long enough for transfer of hen gut microbiota to chickens. Hens were efficient donors of Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria. However, except for genus Faecalibacterium and bacterial species belonging to class Negativicutes, hens did not act as an important source of Gram-positive Firmicutes. Though common to the chicken intestinal tract, Lactobacilli and isolates from families Erysipelotrichaceae, Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae therefore originated from environmental sources instead of from the hens. These observation may have considerable consequences for the evidence-based design of the new generation of probiotics for poultry.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19044952
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200113081520.0
007      
ta
008      
200109s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0212446 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30840648
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Kubasova, Tereza $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Contact with adult hen affects development of caecal microbiota in newly hatched chicks / $c T. Kubasova, M. Kollarcikova, M. Crhanova, D. Karasova, D. Cejkova, A. Sebkova, J. Matiasovicova, M. Faldynova, A. Pokorna, A. Cizek, I. Rychlik,
520    9_
$a Chickens in commercial production are hatched in a clean hatchery environment in the absence of any contact with adult hens. However, Gallus gallus evolved to be hatched in a nest in contact with an adult hen which may act as a donor of gut microbiota. In this study, we therefore addressed the issue of microbiota development in newly hatched chickens with or without contact with an adult hen. We found that a mere 24-hour-long contact between a hen and newly hatched chickens was long enough for transfer of hen gut microbiota to chickens. Hens were efficient donors of Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria. However, except for genus Faecalibacterium and bacterial species belonging to class Negativicutes, hens did not act as an important source of Gram-positive Firmicutes. Though common to the chicken intestinal tract, Lactobacilli and isolates from families Erysipelotrichaceae, Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae therefore originated from environmental sources instead of from the hens. These observation may have considerable consequences for the evidence-based design of the new generation of probiotics for poultry.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    12
$a Bacteria $x klasifikace $x genetika $x růst a vývoj $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001419
650    _2
$a cékum $x mikrobiologie $7 D002432
650    _2
$a kur domácí $x mikrobiologie $7 D002645
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    12
$a střevní mikroflóra $7 D000069196
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kollarcikova, Miloslava $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Crhanova, Magdalena $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Karasova, Daniela $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Cejkova, Darina $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Sebkova, Alena $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Matiasovicova, Jitka $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Faldynova, Marcela $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Pokorna, Alexandra $u Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Cizek, Alois $u Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Rychlik, Ivan $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 14, č. 3 (2019), s. e0212446
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30840648 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200113081852 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1483221 $s 1083625
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 14 $c 3 $d e0212446 $e 20190306 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200109

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...