-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Contact with adult hen affects development of caecal microbiota in newly hatched chicks
T. Kubasova, M. Kollarcikova, M. Crhanova, D. Karasova, D. Cejkova, A. Sebkova, J. Matiasovicova, M. Faldynova, A. Pokorna, A. Cizek, I. Rychlik,
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2006
Free Medical Journals
od 2006
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
od 2006
PubMed Central
od 2006
Europe PubMed Central
od 2006
ProQuest Central
od 2006-12-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2006-10-01
Medline Complete (EBSCOhost)
od 2008-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
Public Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2006-12-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2006
- MeSH
- Bacteria * klasifikace genetika růst a vývoj izolace a purifikace MeSH
- cékum mikrobiologie MeSH
- kur domácí mikrobiologie MeSH
- střevní mikroflóra * MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Check Tag
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- zvířata MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
Chickens in commercial production are hatched in a clean hatchery environment in the absence of any contact with adult hens. However, Gallus gallus evolved to be hatched in a nest in contact with an adult hen which may act as a donor of gut microbiota. In this study, we therefore addressed the issue of microbiota development in newly hatched chickens with or without contact with an adult hen. We found that a mere 24-hour-long contact between a hen and newly hatched chickens was long enough for transfer of hen gut microbiota to chickens. Hens were efficient donors of Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria. However, except for genus Faecalibacterium and bacterial species belonging to class Negativicutes, hens did not act as an important source of Gram-positive Firmicutes. Though common to the chicken intestinal tract, Lactobacilli and isolates from families Erysipelotrichaceae, Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae therefore originated from environmental sources instead of from the hens. These observation may have considerable consequences for the evidence-based design of the new generation of probiotics for poultry.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19044952
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200113081520.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200109s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1371/journal.pone.0212446 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30840648
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Kubasova, Tereza $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Contact with adult hen affects development of caecal microbiota in newly hatched chicks / $c T. Kubasova, M. Kollarcikova, M. Crhanova, D. Karasova, D. Cejkova, A. Sebkova, J. Matiasovicova, M. Faldynova, A. Pokorna, A. Cizek, I. Rychlik,
- 520 9_
- $a Chickens in commercial production are hatched in a clean hatchery environment in the absence of any contact with adult hens. However, Gallus gallus evolved to be hatched in a nest in contact with an adult hen which may act as a donor of gut microbiota. In this study, we therefore addressed the issue of microbiota development in newly hatched chickens with or without contact with an adult hen. We found that a mere 24-hour-long contact between a hen and newly hatched chickens was long enough for transfer of hen gut microbiota to chickens. Hens were efficient donors of Bacteroidetes and Actinobacteria. However, except for genus Faecalibacterium and bacterial species belonging to class Negativicutes, hens did not act as an important source of Gram-positive Firmicutes. Though common to the chicken intestinal tract, Lactobacilli and isolates from families Erysipelotrichaceae, Lachnospiraceae and Ruminococcaceae therefore originated from environmental sources instead of from the hens. These observation may have considerable consequences for the evidence-based design of the new generation of probiotics for poultry.
- 650 _2
- $a zvířata $7 D000818
- 650 12
- $a Bacteria $x klasifikace $x genetika $x růst a vývoj $x izolace a purifikace $7 D001419
- 650 _2
- $a cékum $x mikrobiologie $7 D002432
- 650 _2
- $a kur domácí $x mikrobiologie $7 D002645
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 12
- $a střevní mikroflóra $7 D000069196
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Kollarcikova, Miloslava $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Crhanova, Magdalena $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Karasova, Daniela $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Cejkova, Darina $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sebkova, Alena $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Matiasovicova, Jitka $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Faldynova, Marcela $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Pokorna, Alexandra $u Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Cizek, Alois $u Department of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic. Central European Institute of Technology (CEITEC), University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Rychlik, Ivan $u Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 14, č. 3 (2019), s. e0212446
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30840648 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200113081852 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1483221 $s 1083625
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2019 $b 14 $c 3 $d e0212446 $e 20190306 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200109