• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

The role of plasticity in the evolution of cryptic pigmentation in a freshwater isopod

MD. Lürig, RJ. Best, M. Svitok, J. Jokela, B. Matthews,

. 2019 ; 88 (4) : 612-623. [pub] 20190227

Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc19045035

Cryptic pigmentation of prey is often thought to evolve in response to predator-mediated selection, but pigmentation traits can also be plastic, and change with respect to both abiotic and biotic environmental conditions. In such cases, identifying the presence of, and drivers of trait plasticity is useful for understanding the evolution of crypsis. Previous work suggests that cryptic pigmentation of freshwater isopods (Asellus aquaticus) has evolved in response to predation pressure by fish in habitats with varying macrophyte cover and coloration. However, macrophytes can potentially influence the distribution of pigmentation by altering not only habitat-specific predation susceptibility, but also dietary resources and abiotic conditions. The goals of this study were to experimentally test how two putative agents of selection, namely macrophytes and fish, affect the pigmentation of A. aquaticus, and to assess whether pigmentation is plastic, using a diet manipulation in a common garden. We performed two experiments: (a) in an outdoor mesocosm experiment, we investigated how different densities of predatory fish (0/30/60 three-spined stickleback [Gasterosteus aculeatus] per mesocosm) and macrophytes (presence/absence) affected the abundance, pigmentation and body size structure of isopod populations. (b) In a subsequent laboratory experiment, we reared isopods in a common garden experiment on two different food sources (high/low protein content) to test whether variation in pigmentation of isopods can be explained by diet-based developmental plasticity. We found that fish presence strongly reduced isopod densities, particularly in the absence of macrophytes, but had no effect on pigmentation or size structure of the populations. However, we found that isopods showed consistently higher pigmentation in the presence of macrophytes, regardless of fish presence or absence. Our laboratory experiment, in which we manipulated the protein content of the isopods' diet, revealed strong plasticity of pigmentation and weak plasticity of growth rate. The combined results of both experiments suggest that pigmentation of A. aquaticus is a developmentally plastic trait and that multiple environmental factors (e.g. macrophytes, diet and predation) might jointly influence the evolution of cryptic pigmentation of A. aquaticus in nature on relatively short time-scales.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19045035
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200113081624.0
007      
ta
008      
200109s2019 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/1365-2656.12950 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)30666639
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Lürig, Moritz D $u Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag Kastanienbaum), Kastanienbaum, Switzerland. Center for Adaption to a Changing Environment (ACE), Institute of Integrative Biology, Zürich, Switzerland.
245    14
$a The role of plasticity in the evolution of cryptic pigmentation in a freshwater isopod / $c MD. Lürig, RJ. Best, M. Svitok, J. Jokela, B. Matthews,
520    9_
$a Cryptic pigmentation of prey is often thought to evolve in response to predator-mediated selection, but pigmentation traits can also be plastic, and change with respect to both abiotic and biotic environmental conditions. In such cases, identifying the presence of, and drivers of trait plasticity is useful for understanding the evolution of crypsis. Previous work suggests that cryptic pigmentation of freshwater isopods (Asellus aquaticus) has evolved in response to predation pressure by fish in habitats with varying macrophyte cover and coloration. However, macrophytes can potentially influence the distribution of pigmentation by altering not only habitat-specific predation susceptibility, but also dietary resources and abiotic conditions. The goals of this study were to experimentally test how two putative agents of selection, namely macrophytes and fish, affect the pigmentation of A. aquaticus, and to assess whether pigmentation is plastic, using a diet manipulation in a common garden. We performed two experiments: (a) in an outdoor mesocosm experiment, we investigated how different densities of predatory fish (0/30/60 three-spined stickleback [Gasterosteus aculeatus] per mesocosm) and macrophytes (presence/absence) affected the abundance, pigmentation and body size structure of isopod populations. (b) In a subsequent laboratory experiment, we reared isopods in a common garden experiment on two different food sources (high/low protein content) to test whether variation in pigmentation of isopods can be explained by diet-based developmental plasticity. We found that fish presence strongly reduced isopod densities, particularly in the absence of macrophytes, but had no effect on pigmentation or size structure of the populations. However, we found that isopods showed consistently higher pigmentation in the presence of macrophytes, regardless of fish presence or absence. Our laboratory experiment, in which we manipulated the protein content of the isopods' diet, revealed strong plasticity of pigmentation and weak plasticity of growth rate. The combined results of both experiments suggest that pigmentation of A. aquaticus is a developmentally plastic trait and that multiple environmental factors (e.g. macrophytes, diet and predation) might jointly influence the evolution of cryptic pigmentation of A. aquaticus in nature on relatively short time-scales.
650    _2
$a zvířata $7 D000818
650    _2
$a ekosystém $7 D017753
650    _2
$a sladká voda $7 D005618
650    12
$a Isopoda $7 D033321
650    _2
$a pigmentace $7 D010858
650    _2
$a predátorské chování $7 D011235
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Best, Rebecca J $u Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag Kastanienbaum), Kastanienbaum, Switzerland. School of Earth and Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, Arizona.
700    1_
$a Svitok, Marek $u Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag Kastanienbaum), Kastanienbaum, Switzerland. Department of Biology and General Ecology, Faculty of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia. Department of Ecosystem Biology, Faculty of Science, University of South Bohemia, České Budějovice, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Jokela, Jukka $u Center for Adaption to a Changing Environment (ACE), Institute of Integrative Biology, Zürich, Switzerland. Department of Aquatic Ecology, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, EAWAG, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
700    1_
$a Matthews, Blake $u Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag Kastanienbaum), Kastanienbaum, Switzerland.
773    0_
$w MED00007675 $t The Journal of animal ecology $x 1365-2656 $g Roč. 88, č. 4 (2019), s. 612-623
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30666639 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200113081956 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1483304 $s 1083708
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 88 $c 4 $d 612-623 $e 20190227 $i 1365-2656 $m Journal of animal ecology $n J Anim Ecol $x MED00007675
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200109

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

    Možnosti archivace