-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
What do European women know about their female cancer risks and cancer screening? A cross-sectional online intervention survey in five European countries
O. Wegwarth, M. Widschwendter, D. Cibula, K. Sundström, R. Portuesi, I. Lein, FG. Rebitschek, FORECEE (4C) consortium,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2011
Free Medical Journals
od 2011
PubMed Central
od 2011
Europe PubMed Central
od 2011
ProQuest Central
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2011-01-01
Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2011-01-01
Health & Medicine (ProQuest)
od 2011-01-01
Family Health Database (ProQuest)
od 2011-01-01
Psychology Database (ProQuest)
od 2011-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2011
- MeSH
- časná detekce nádoru metody MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- internacionalita MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metody pro podporu rozhodování * MeSH
- nádory prsu prevence a kontrola MeSH
- nádory ženských pohlavních orgánů patologie prevence a kontrola MeSH
- odhad potřeb MeSH
- průřezové studie MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- rozhodování MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- věkové faktory MeSH
- zdraví - znalosti, postoje, praxe * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- senioři MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Česká republika MeSH
- Itálie MeSH
- Německo MeSH
- Švédsko MeSH
OBJECTIVES: Informed decisions about cancer screening require accurate knowledge regarding cancer risks and screening. This study investigates: (1) European women's knowledge of their risk of developing breast, ovarian, cervical or endometrial cancer, (2) their knowledge about mammography screening and (3) whether an evidence-based leaflet improves their knowledge. DESIGN: Cross-sectional online intervention survey. SETTING: National samples from five European countries (Czech Republic, Germany, UK, Italy and Sweden)-drawn from the Harris Interactive and the Toluna panel, respectively, in January 2017-were queried on their knowledge of age-specific risks of developing breast, cervical, ovarian or endometrial cancer within the next 10 years and of mammography screening before and after intervention. PARTICIPANTS: Of 3629 women (inclusion criteria: age 40-75 years) invited, 2092 responded and 1675 completed the survey (response rate: 61.4%). INTERVENTION: Evidence-based leaflet summarising information on age-adjusted female cancer risks, mammography and aspects of cancer prevention. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of women (1) accurately estimating their risk of four female cancers, (2) holding correct assumptions of mammography screening and (3) changing their estimations and assumptions after exposure to leaflet. FINDINGS: Across countries, 59.2% (95% CI 56.8% to 61.6%) to 91.8% (95% CI 90.3% to 93.0%) overestimated their female cancer risks 7-33 fold (mediansacross tumours: 50.0 to 200.0). 26.5% (95% CI 24.4% to 28.7%) were aware that mammography screening has both benefits and harms. Women who accurately estimated their breast cancer risk were less likely to believe that mammography prevents cancer (p<0.001). After leaflet intervention, knowledge of cancer risks improved by 27.0 (95% CI 24.9 to 29.2) to 37.1 (95% CI 34.8 to 39.4) percentage points and of mammography by 23.0 (95% CI 21.0 to 25.1) percentage points. CONCLUSION: A considerable number of women in five European countries may not possess the prerequisites for an informed choice on cancer screening. Evidence-based information in patient leaflets can improve this situation.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Charles University Prague Prague UK
Department of Women's Cancer University College London London UK
Harding Center for Risk Literacy Max Planck Institute for Human Development Berlin Germany
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19045074
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200113081700.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200109s2018 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023789 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)30593552
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Wegwarth, Odette $u Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany. Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
- 245 10
- $a What do European women know about their female cancer risks and cancer screening? A cross-sectional online intervention survey in five European countries / $c O. Wegwarth, M. Widschwendter, D. Cibula, K. Sundström, R. Portuesi, I. Lein, FG. Rebitschek, FORECEE (4C) consortium,
- 520 9_
- $a OBJECTIVES: Informed decisions about cancer screening require accurate knowledge regarding cancer risks and screening. This study investigates: (1) European women's knowledge of their risk of developing breast, ovarian, cervical or endometrial cancer, (2) their knowledge about mammography screening and (3) whether an evidence-based leaflet improves their knowledge. DESIGN: Cross-sectional online intervention survey. SETTING: National samples from five European countries (Czech Republic, Germany, UK, Italy and Sweden)-drawn from the Harris Interactive and the Toluna panel, respectively, in January 2017-were queried on their knowledge of age-specific risks of developing breast, cervical, ovarian or endometrial cancer within the next 10 years and of mammography screening before and after intervention. PARTICIPANTS: Of 3629 women (inclusion criteria: age 40-75 years) invited, 2092 responded and 1675 completed the survey (response rate: 61.4%). INTERVENTION: Evidence-based leaflet summarising information on age-adjusted female cancer risks, mammography and aspects of cancer prevention. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of women (1) accurately estimating their risk of four female cancers, (2) holding correct assumptions of mammography screening and (3) changing their estimations and assumptions after exposure to leaflet. FINDINGS: Across countries, 59.2% (95% CI 56.8% to 61.6%) to 91.8% (95% CI 90.3% to 93.0%) overestimated their female cancer risks 7-33 fold (mediansacross tumours: 50.0 to 200.0). 26.5% (95% CI 24.4% to 28.7%) were aware that mammography screening has both benefits and harms. Women who accurately estimated their breast cancer risk were less likely to believe that mammography prevents cancer (p<0.001). After leaflet intervention, knowledge of cancer risks improved by 27.0 (95% CI 24.9 to 29.2) to 37.1 (95% CI 34.8 to 39.4) percentage points and of mammography by 23.0 (95% CI 21.0 to 25.1) percentage points. CONCLUSION: A considerable number of women in five European countries may not possess the prerequisites for an informed choice on cancer screening. Evidence-based information in patient leaflets can improve this situation.
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a věkové faktory $7 D000367
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a nádory prsu $x prevence a kontrola $7 D001943
- 650 _2
- $a průřezové studie $7 D003430
- 650 _2
- $a rozhodování $7 D003657
- 650 12
- $a metody pro podporu rozhodování $7 D003661
- 650 _2
- $a časná detekce nádoru $x metody $7 D055088
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a nádory ženských pohlavních orgánů $x patologie $x prevence a kontrola $7 D005833
- 650 12
- $a zdraví - znalosti, postoje, praxe $7 D007722
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a internacionalita $7 D038622
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a odhad potřeb $7 D020380
- 650 _2
- $a průzkumy a dotazníky $7 D011795
- 651 _2
- $a Česká republika $7 D018153
- 651 _2
- $a Německo $7 D005858
- 651 _2
- $a Itálie $7 D007558
- 651 _2
- $a Švédsko $7 D013548
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a multicentrická studie $7 D016448
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Widschwendter, Martin $u Department of Women's Cancer, University College London, London, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Cibula, David $u Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charles University Prague (Czech Republic), Prague, UK.
- 700 1_
- $a Sundström, Karin $u Department of Laboratory Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. Laboratory Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska University, Stockholm, Sweden.
- 700 1_
- $a Portuesi, Rosalba $u Unit of Gynecology, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy. Unit of Preventive Gynecology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy.
- 700 1_
- $a Lein, Ines $u Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
- 700 1_
- $a Rebitschek, Felix G $u Harding Center for Risk Literacy, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
- 710 2_
- $a FORECEE (4C) consortium
- 773 0_
- $w MED00184484 $t BMJ open $x 2044-6055 $g Roč. 8, č. 12 (2018), s. e023789
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30593552 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200113082032 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1483343 $s 1083747
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 8 $c 12 $d e023789 $e 20181228 $i 2044-6055 $m BMJ open $n BMJ Open $x MED00184484
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200109