-
Something wrong with this record ?
Efficacy and safety of mirabegron for the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity-Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
J. Krhut, V. Borovička, K. Bílková, R. Sýkora, D. Míka, J. Mokriš, R. Zachoval,
Language English Country United States
Document type Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Grant support
ISR CZ-110-RG-14
Astellas Pharma - International
PubMed
29603781
DOI
10.1002/nau.23566
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Acetanilides adverse effects therapeutic use MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Double-Blind Method MeSH
- Patient Reported Outcome Measures MeSH
- Urinary Bladder, Overactive drug therapy MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Prospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Thiazoles adverse effects therapeutic use MeSH
- Urodynamics drug effects MeSH
- Urological Agents adverse effects therapeutic use MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
- Randomized Controlled Trial MeSH
AIMS: To assess the efficacy and safety of mirabegron in the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in three tertiary centers, and included 78 patients suffering from spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis. Patients were randomized for Mirabegron 50 mg (Group A) or placebo (Group B). Urodynamic parameters, the 24 h pad-weight test, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. Safety assessments included monitoring the incidence and severity of adverse events. Changes in time and differences between groups were assessed with nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance; P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In total, 66 patients were eligible for inclusion in the final analysis. There was a significant increase of volume at the first detrusor contraction (P = 0.00047) and an improvement in bladder compliance (P = 0.0041) in the mirabegron group compared with the placebo-treated group, whereas the increase in cystometric capacity did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.061). There was a clear tendency to reduced urine leakage (P = 0.056) in Group A. There were significant changes in all the patient-reported outcomes, favoring the mirabegron group. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was 3.13%. CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron (50 mg) improved both urodynamic variables and patient-reported outcomes in patients with NDO. The treatment was tolerated well.
Department of Urology Thomayer Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology University Hospital Ostrava Czech Republic
Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Unit Rehabilitation Center Kladruby Czech Republic
References provided by Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc19045509
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200116093451.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200109s2018 xxu f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/nau.23566 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)29603781
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxu
- 100 1_
- $a Krhut, Jan $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 245 10
- $a Efficacy and safety of mirabegron for the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity-Prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study / $c J. Krhut, V. Borovička, K. Bílková, R. Sýkora, D. Míka, J. Mokriš, R. Zachoval,
- 520 9_
- $a AIMS: To assess the efficacy and safety of mirabegron in the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted in three tertiary centers, and included 78 patients suffering from spinal cord injury or multiple sclerosis. Patients were randomized for Mirabegron 50 mg (Group A) or placebo (Group B). Urodynamic parameters, the 24 h pad-weight test, and patient-reported outcomes were assessed. Safety assessments included monitoring the incidence and severity of adverse events. Changes in time and differences between groups were assessed with nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis one-way analysis of variance; P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: In total, 66 patients were eligible for inclusion in the final analysis. There was a significant increase of volume at the first detrusor contraction (P = 0.00047) and an improvement in bladder compliance (P = 0.0041) in the mirabegron group compared with the placebo-treated group, whereas the increase in cystometric capacity did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.061). There was a clear tendency to reduced urine leakage (P = 0.056) in Group A. There were significant changes in all the patient-reported outcomes, favoring the mirabegron group. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was 3.13%. CONCLUSIONS: Mirabegron (50 mg) improved both urodynamic variables and patient-reported outcomes in patients with NDO. The treatment was tolerated well.
- 650 _2
- $a acetanilidy $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D000083
- 650 _2
- $a mladiství $7 D000293
- 650 _2
- $a dospělí $7 D000328
- 650 _2
- $a senioři $7 D000368
- 650 _2
- $a dvojitá slepá metoda $7 D004311
- 650 _2
- $a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
- 650 _2
- $a lidé $7 D006801
- 650 _2
- $a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
- 650 _2
- $a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
- 650 _2
- $a hodnocení výsledků péče pacientem $7 D000071066
- 650 _2
- $a prospektivní studie $7 D011446
- 650 _2
- $a thiazoly $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D013844
- 650 _2
- $a výsledek terapie $7 D016896
- 650 _2
- $a hyperaktivní močový měchýř $x farmakoterapie $7 D053201
- 650 _2
- $a urodynamika $x účinky léků $7 D014563
- 650 _2
- $a urologické látky $x škodlivé účinky $x terapeutické užití $7 D064804
- 650 _2
- $a mladý dospělý $7 D055815
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 655 _2
- $a randomizované kontrolované studie $7 D016449
- 655 _2
- $a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
- 700 1_
- $a Borovička, Vladimír $u Department of Urology, Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Bílková, Karolína $u Spinal Cord Rehabilitation Unit, Rehabilitation Center, Kladruby, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Sýkora, Radek $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Míka, David $u Department of Urology, University Hospital, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Mokriš, Jan $u Department of Urology, Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Zachoval, Roman $u Department of Urology, Thomayer Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003515 $t Neurourology and urodynamics $x 1520-6777 $g Roč. 37, č. 7 (2018), s. 2226-2233
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29603781 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200109 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200116093825 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1483777 $s 1084182
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2018 $b 37 $c 7 $d 2226-2233 $e 20180331 $i 1520-6777 $m Neurourology and urodynamics $n Neurol. urodyn. (Print) $x MED00003515
- GRA __
- $a ISR CZ-110-RG-14 $p Astellas Pharma $2 International
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200109