Detail
Article
Online article
FT
Medvik - BMC
  • Something wrong with this record ?

Host preference and network properties in biotrophic plant-fungal associations

S. Põlme, M. Bahram, H. Jacquemyn, P. Kennedy, P. Kohout, M. Moora, J. Oja, M. Öpik, L. Pecoraro, L. Tedersoo,

. 2018 ; 217 (3) : 1230-1239. [pub] 20171122

Language English Country Great Britain

Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Analytical methods can offer insights into the structure of biological networks, but mechanisms that determine the structure of these networks remain unclear. We conducted a synthesis based on 111 previously published datasets to assess a range of ecological and evolutionary mechanisms that may influence the plant-associated fungal interaction networks. We calculated the relative host effect on fungal community composition and compared nestedness and modularity among different mycorrhizal types and endophytic fungal guilds. We also assessed how plant-fungal network structure was related to host phylogeny, environmental and sampling properties. Orchid mycorrhizal fungal communities responded most strongly to host identity, but the effect of host was similar among all other fungal guilds. Community nestedness, which did not differ among fungal guilds, declined significantly with increasing mean annual precipitation on a global scale. Orchid and ericoid mycorrhizal fungal communities were more modular than ectomycorrhizal and root endophytic communities, with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in an intermediate position. Network properties among a broad suite of plant-associated fungi were largely comparable and generally unrelated to phylogenetic distance among hosts. Instead, network metrics were predominantly affected by sampling and matrix properties, indicating the importance of study design in properly inferring ecological patterns.

References provided by Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc19045580
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200113082414.0
007      
ta
008      
200109s2018 xxk f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1111/nph.14895 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)29165806
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxk
100    1_
$a Põlme, Sergei $u Natural History Museum, University of Tartu, 14a Ravila, 50411, Tartu, Estonia. Department of Botany, University of Tartu, 40 Lai Street, 51005, Tartu, Estonia.
245    10
$a Host preference and network properties in biotrophic plant-fungal associations / $c S. Põlme, M. Bahram, H. Jacquemyn, P. Kennedy, P. Kohout, M. Moora, J. Oja, M. Öpik, L. Pecoraro, L. Tedersoo,
520    9_
$a Analytical methods can offer insights into the structure of biological networks, but mechanisms that determine the structure of these networks remain unclear. We conducted a synthesis based on 111 previously published datasets to assess a range of ecological and evolutionary mechanisms that may influence the plant-associated fungal interaction networks. We calculated the relative host effect on fungal community composition and compared nestedness and modularity among different mycorrhizal types and endophytic fungal guilds. We also assessed how plant-fungal network structure was related to host phylogeny, environmental and sampling properties. Orchid mycorrhizal fungal communities responded most strongly to host identity, but the effect of host was similar among all other fungal guilds. Community nestedness, which did not differ among fungal guilds, declined significantly with increasing mean annual precipitation on a global scale. Orchid and ericoid mycorrhizal fungal communities were more modular than ectomycorrhizal and root endophytic communities, with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in an intermediate position. Network properties among a broad suite of plant-associated fungi were largely comparable and generally unrelated to phylogenetic distance among hosts. Instead, network metrics were predominantly affected by sampling and matrix properties, indicating the importance of study design in properly inferring ecological patterns.
650    _2
$a houby $x fyziologie $7 D005658
650    _2
$a hostitelská specificita $7 D058507
650    _2
$a interakce hostitele a patogenu $x fyziologie $7 D054884
650    _2
$a rostliny $x mikrobiologie $7 D010944
650    _2
$a déšť $7 D011891
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Bahram, Mohammad $u Department of Botany, University of Tartu, 40 Lai Street, 51005, Tartu, Estonia. Department of Organismal Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, 75236, Uppsala, Sweden.
700    1_
$a Jacquemyn, Hans $u Department of Biology, Plant Conservation and Population Biology, KU Leuven, Kasteelpark Arenberg 31, B-3001, Heverlee, Belgium.
700    1_
$a Kennedy, Peter $u Department of Plant Biology, University of Minnesota, 1445 Gortner Ave, St Paul, MN, 55108, USA.
700    1_
$a Kohout, Petr $u Department of Botany, University of Tartu, 40 Lai Street, 51005, Tartu, Estonia. Institute of Botany, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, CZ-252 43, Průhonice, Czech Republic. Faculty of Science, Charles University, CZ-128 44, Prague 2, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Moora, Mari $u Department of Botany, University of Tartu, 40 Lai Street, 51005, Tartu, Estonia.
700    1_
$a Oja, Jane $u Department of Botany, University of Tartu, 40 Lai Street, 51005, Tartu, Estonia.
700    1_
$a Öpik, Maarja $u Department of Botany, University of Tartu, 40 Lai Street, 51005, Tartu, Estonia.
700    1_
$a Pecoraro, Lorenzo $u Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Orchid Conservation and Utilization, The National Orchid Conservation Center of China and The Orchid Conservation and Research Center of Shenzhen, 518114, Shenzhen, China. Center for Biotechnology & BioMedicine and Division of Life & Health Sciences, Graduate School at Shenzhen, Tsinghua University, 518055, Shenzhen, China. State Key Laboratory of Mycology, Institute of Microbiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100101, China.
700    1_
$a Tedersoo, Leho $u Natural History Museum, University of Tartu, 14a Ravila, 50411, Tartu, Estonia.
773    0_
$w MED00007692 $t The New phytologist $x 1469-8137 $g Roč. 217, č. 3 (2018), s. 1230-1239
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29165806 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200109 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200113082746 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1483848 $s 1084253
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2018 $b 217 $c 3 $d 1230-1239 $e 20171122 $i 1469-8137 $m New phytologist $n New Phytol $x MED00007692
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200109

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...