• Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Improved Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Uptake of Complexed Daidzein in Rats

A. Kwiecień, J. Ruda-Kucerova, K. Kamiński, Z. Babinska, I. Popiołek, K. Szczubiałka, M. Nowakowska, M. Walczak,

. 2020 ; 12 (2) : . [pub] 20200216

Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20005148

The pharmacokinetic profile and tissue uptake of daidzein (DAI) was determined in rat serum and tissues (lungs, eyes, brain, heart, spleen, fat, liver, kidney, and testes) after intravenous and intraperitoneal administration of DAI in suspension or complexed with ethylenediamine-modified γ-cyclodextrin (GCD-EDA/DAI). The absolute and relative bioavailability of DAI suspended (20 mg/kg i.v. vs. 50 mg/kg i.p.) and complexed (0.54 mg/kg i.v. vs. 1.35 mg/kg i.p.) was determined. After i.p. administration, absorption of DAI complexed with GCD-EDA was more rapid (tmax = 15 min) than that of DAI in suspension (tmax = 45 min) with a ca. 3.6 times higher maximum concentration (Cmax = 615 vs. 173 ng/mL). The i.v. half-life of DAI was longer in GCD-EDA/DAI complex compared with DAI in suspension (t0.5 = 380 min vs. 230 min). The volume of distribution of DAI given i.v. in GCD-EDA/DAI complex was ca. 6 times larger than DAI in suspension (38.6 L/kg vs. 6.2 L/kg). Our data support the concept that the pharmacokinetics of DAI suspended in high doses are nonlinear. Increasing the intravenous dose 34 times resulted in a 5-fold increase in AUC. In turn, increasing the intraperitoneal dose 37 times resulted in a ca. 2-fold increase in AUC. The results of this study suggested that GCD-EDA complex may improve DAI bioavailability after i.p. administration. The absolute bioavailability of DAI in GCD-EDA inclusion complex was ca. 3 times greater (F = 82.4% vs. 28.2%), and the relative bioavailability was ca. 21 times higher than that of DAI in suspension, indicating the need to study DAI bioavailability after administration by routes other than intraperitoneal, e.g., orally, subcutaneously, or intramuscularly. The concentration of DAI released from GCD-EDA/DAI inclusion complex to all the rat tissues studied was higher than after administration of DAI in suspension. The concentration of DAI in brain and lungs was found to be almost 90 and 45 times higher, respectively, when administered in complex compared to the suspended DAI. Given the nonlinear relationship between DAI bioavailability and the dose released from the GCD-EDA complex, complexation of DAI may thus offer an effective approach to improve DAI delivery for treatment purposes, for example in mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS), allowing the reduction of ingested DAI doses.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20005148
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200527111624.0
007      
ta
008      
200511s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.3390/pharmaceutics12020162 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)32079113
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a sz
100    1_
$a Kwiecień, Anna $u Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medyczna 9, 30-688 Kraków, Poland.
245    10
$a Improved Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Uptake of Complexed Daidzein in Rats / $c A. Kwiecień, J. Ruda-Kucerova, K. Kamiński, Z. Babinska, I. Popiołek, K. Szczubiałka, M. Nowakowska, M. Walczak,
520    9_
$a The pharmacokinetic profile and tissue uptake of daidzein (DAI) was determined in rat serum and tissues (lungs, eyes, brain, heart, spleen, fat, liver, kidney, and testes) after intravenous and intraperitoneal administration of DAI in suspension or complexed with ethylenediamine-modified γ-cyclodextrin (GCD-EDA/DAI). The absolute and relative bioavailability of DAI suspended (20 mg/kg i.v. vs. 50 mg/kg i.p.) and complexed (0.54 mg/kg i.v. vs. 1.35 mg/kg i.p.) was determined. After i.p. administration, absorption of DAI complexed with GCD-EDA was more rapid (tmax = 15 min) than that of DAI in suspension (tmax = 45 min) with a ca. 3.6 times higher maximum concentration (Cmax = 615 vs. 173 ng/mL). The i.v. half-life of DAI was longer in GCD-EDA/DAI complex compared with DAI in suspension (t0.5 = 380 min vs. 230 min). The volume of distribution of DAI given i.v. in GCD-EDA/DAI complex was ca. 6 times larger than DAI in suspension (38.6 L/kg vs. 6.2 L/kg). Our data support the concept that the pharmacokinetics of DAI suspended in high doses are nonlinear. Increasing the intravenous dose 34 times resulted in a 5-fold increase in AUC. In turn, increasing the intraperitoneal dose 37 times resulted in a ca. 2-fold increase in AUC. The results of this study suggested that GCD-EDA complex may improve DAI bioavailability after i.p. administration. The absolute bioavailability of DAI in GCD-EDA inclusion complex was ca. 3 times greater (F = 82.4% vs. 28.2%), and the relative bioavailability was ca. 21 times higher than that of DAI in suspension, indicating the need to study DAI bioavailability after administration by routes other than intraperitoneal, e.g., orally, subcutaneously, or intramuscularly. The concentration of DAI released from GCD-EDA/DAI inclusion complex to all the rat tissues studied was higher than after administration of DAI in suspension. The concentration of DAI in brain and lungs was found to be almost 90 and 45 times higher, respectively, when administered in complex compared to the suspended DAI. Given the nonlinear relationship between DAI bioavailability and the dose released from the GCD-EDA complex, complexation of DAI may thus offer an effective approach to improve DAI delivery for treatment purposes, for example in mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS), allowing the reduction of ingested DAI doses.
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
700    1_
$a Ruda-Kucerova, Jana $u Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kamiński, Kamil $u Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, 30-387 Kraków, Poland.
700    1_
$a Babinska, Zuzana $u Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Popiołek, Iwona $u Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, 30-387 Kraków, Poland.
700    1_
$a Szczubiałka, Krzysztof $u Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, 30-387 Kraków, Poland.
700    1_
$a Nowakowska, Maria $u Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, 30-387 Kraków, Poland.
700    1_
$a Walczak, Maria $u Chair and Department of Toxicology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medyczna 9, 30-688 Kraków, Poland.
773    0_
$w MED00186380 $t Pharmaceutics $x 1999-4923 $g Roč. 12, č. 2 (2020)
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32079113 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200511 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200527111620 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ind $b bmc $g 1524078 $s 1095203
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2020 $b 12 $c 2 $e 20200216 $i 1999-4923 $m Pharmaceutics $n Pharmaceutics $x MED00186380
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200511

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...