-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Improved Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Uptake of Complexed Daidzein in Rats
A. Kwiecień, J. Ruda-Kucerova, K. Kamiński, Z. Babinska, I. Popiołek, K. Szczubiałka, M. Nowakowska, M. Walczak,
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2010
Free Medical Journals
od 2010
PubMed Central
od 2009
Europe PubMed Central
od 2009
ProQuest Central
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2009-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2010-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2009
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The pharmacokinetic profile and tissue uptake of daidzein (DAI) was determined in rat serum and tissues (lungs, eyes, brain, heart, spleen, fat, liver, kidney, and testes) after intravenous and intraperitoneal administration of DAI in suspension or complexed with ethylenediamine-modified γ-cyclodextrin (GCD-EDA/DAI). The absolute and relative bioavailability of DAI suspended (20 mg/kg i.v. vs. 50 mg/kg i.p.) and complexed (0.54 mg/kg i.v. vs. 1.35 mg/kg i.p.) was determined. After i.p. administration, absorption of DAI complexed with GCD-EDA was more rapid (tmax = 15 min) than that of DAI in suspension (tmax = 45 min) with a ca. 3.6 times higher maximum concentration (Cmax = 615 vs. 173 ng/mL). The i.v. half-life of DAI was longer in GCD-EDA/DAI complex compared with DAI in suspension (t0.5 = 380 min vs. 230 min). The volume of distribution of DAI given i.v. in GCD-EDA/DAI complex was ca. 6 times larger than DAI in suspension (38.6 L/kg vs. 6.2 L/kg). Our data support the concept that the pharmacokinetics of DAI suspended in high doses are nonlinear. Increasing the intravenous dose 34 times resulted in a 5-fold increase in AUC. In turn, increasing the intraperitoneal dose 37 times resulted in a ca. 2-fold increase in AUC. The results of this study suggested that GCD-EDA complex may improve DAI bioavailability after i.p. administration. The absolute bioavailability of DAI in GCD-EDA inclusion complex was ca. 3 times greater (F = 82.4% vs. 28.2%), and the relative bioavailability was ca. 21 times higher than that of DAI in suspension, indicating the need to study DAI bioavailability after administration by routes other than intraperitoneal, e.g., orally, subcutaneously, or intramuscularly. The concentration of DAI released from GCD-EDA/DAI inclusion complex to all the rat tissues studied was higher than after administration of DAI in suspension. The concentration of DAI in brain and lungs was found to be almost 90 and 45 times higher, respectively, when administered in complex compared to the suspended DAI. Given the nonlinear relationship between DAI bioavailability and the dose released from the GCD-EDA complex, complexation of DAI may thus offer an effective approach to improve DAI delivery for treatment purposes, for example in mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS), allowing the reduction of ingested DAI doses.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20005148
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200527111624.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200511s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3390/pharmaceutics12020162 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32079113
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Kwiecień, Anna $u Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medyczna 9, 30-688 Kraków, Poland.
- 245 10
- $a Improved Pharmacokinetics and Tissue Uptake of Complexed Daidzein in Rats / $c A. Kwiecień, J. Ruda-Kucerova, K. Kamiński, Z. Babinska, I. Popiołek, K. Szczubiałka, M. Nowakowska, M. Walczak,
- 520 9_
- $a The pharmacokinetic profile and tissue uptake of daidzein (DAI) was determined in rat serum and tissues (lungs, eyes, brain, heart, spleen, fat, liver, kidney, and testes) after intravenous and intraperitoneal administration of DAI in suspension or complexed with ethylenediamine-modified γ-cyclodextrin (GCD-EDA/DAI). The absolute and relative bioavailability of DAI suspended (20 mg/kg i.v. vs. 50 mg/kg i.p.) and complexed (0.54 mg/kg i.v. vs. 1.35 mg/kg i.p.) was determined. After i.p. administration, absorption of DAI complexed with GCD-EDA was more rapid (tmax = 15 min) than that of DAI in suspension (tmax = 45 min) with a ca. 3.6 times higher maximum concentration (Cmax = 615 vs. 173 ng/mL). The i.v. half-life of DAI was longer in GCD-EDA/DAI complex compared with DAI in suspension (t0.5 = 380 min vs. 230 min). The volume of distribution of DAI given i.v. in GCD-EDA/DAI complex was ca. 6 times larger than DAI in suspension (38.6 L/kg vs. 6.2 L/kg). Our data support the concept that the pharmacokinetics of DAI suspended in high doses are nonlinear. Increasing the intravenous dose 34 times resulted in a 5-fold increase in AUC. In turn, increasing the intraperitoneal dose 37 times resulted in a ca. 2-fold increase in AUC. The results of this study suggested that GCD-EDA complex may improve DAI bioavailability after i.p. administration. The absolute bioavailability of DAI in GCD-EDA inclusion complex was ca. 3 times greater (F = 82.4% vs. 28.2%), and the relative bioavailability was ca. 21 times higher than that of DAI in suspension, indicating the need to study DAI bioavailability after administration by routes other than intraperitoneal, e.g., orally, subcutaneously, or intramuscularly. The concentration of DAI released from GCD-EDA/DAI inclusion complex to all the rat tissues studied was higher than after administration of DAI in suspension. The concentration of DAI in brain and lungs was found to be almost 90 and 45 times higher, respectively, when administered in complex compared to the suspended DAI. Given the nonlinear relationship between DAI bioavailability and the dose released from the GCD-EDA complex, complexation of DAI may thus offer an effective approach to improve DAI delivery for treatment purposes, for example in mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS), allowing the reduction of ingested DAI doses.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Ruda-Kucerova, Jana $u Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Kamiński, Kamil $u Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, 30-387 Kraków, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Babinska, Zuzana $u Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, Brno 625 00, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Popiołek, Iwona $u Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, 30-387 Kraków, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Szczubiałka, Krzysztof $u Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, 30-387 Kraków, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Nowakowska, Maria $u Faculty of Chemistry, Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 2, 30-387 Kraków, Poland.
- 700 1_
- $a Walczak, Maria $u Chair and Department of Toxicology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medyczna 9, 30-688 Kraków, Poland.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00186380 $t Pharmaceutics $x 1999-4923 $g Roč. 12, č. 2 (2020)
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32079113 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200511 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200527111620 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1524078 $s 1095203
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 12 $c 2 $e 20200216 $i 1999-4923 $m Pharmaceutics $n Pharmaceutics $x MED00186380
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200511