-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Psychometric Properties of Screening Questionnaires for Children With Handwriting Issues
K. Šafárová, J. Mekyska, V. Zvončák, Z. Galáž, P. Francová, B. Čechová, B. Losenická, Z. Smékal, T. Urbánek, JM. Havigerová, S. Rosenblum,
Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
NLK
Directory of Open Access Journals
od 2010
Free Medical Journals
od 2010
PubMed Central
od 2010
Europe PubMed Central
od 2010
Open Access Digital Library
od 2010-01-01
Open Access Digital Library
od 2010-01-01
ROAD: Directory of Open Access Scholarly Resources
od 2010
PubMed
32038361
DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02937
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Dysgraphia (D) is a complex specific learning disorder with a prevalence of up to 30%, which is linked with handwriting issues. The factors recognized for assessing these issues are legibility and performance time. Two questionnaires, the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire (HPSQ) for teachers and its modification for children (HPSQ-C), were established as quick and valid screening tools along with a third factor - emotional and physical well-being. Until now, in the Czechia, there has been no validated screening tool for D diagnosis. A study was conducted on a set of 294 children from 3rd and 4th year of primary school (132 girls/162 boys; Mage 8.96 ± 0.73) and 21 teachers who spent most of their time with them. Confirmatory factor analysis based on the theoretical background showed poor fit for HPSQ [χ2(32) = 115.07, p < 0.001; comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.95; Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.93; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.09; standard root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.05] and excellent fit for HPSQ-C [χ2(32) = 31.12, p = 0.51; CFI = 1.0; TLI = 1.0; RMSEA = 0.0; SRMR = 0.04]. For the HPSQ-C models, there were no differences between boys and girls [Δχ2(7) = 12.55, p = 0.08]. Values of McDonalds's ω indicate excellent (HPSQ, ω = 0.9) and acceptable (HPSQ-C, ω = 0.7) reliability. Boys were assessed as worse writers than girls based on the results of both questionnaires. The grades positively correlate with the total scores of both HPSQ (r = 0.54, p < 0.01) and HPSQ-C (r = 0.28, p < 0.01). Based on the results, for the assessment of handwriting difficulties experienced by Czech children, we recommend using the HPSQ-C questionnaire for research purposes.
Department of Occupational Therapy University of Haifa Haifa Israel
Department of Psychology Masaryk University Brno Czechia
Department of Telecommunications Brno University of Technology Brno Czechia
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20005223
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20210316133525.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200511s2020 sz f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02937 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)32038361
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a sz
- 100 1_
- $a Šafárová, Katarína $u Department of Psychology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
- 245 10
- $a Psychometric Properties of Screening Questionnaires for Children With Handwriting Issues / $c K. Šafárová, J. Mekyska, V. Zvončák, Z. Galáž, P. Francová, B. Čechová, B. Losenická, Z. Smékal, T. Urbánek, JM. Havigerová, S. Rosenblum,
- 520 9_
- $a Dysgraphia (D) is a complex specific learning disorder with a prevalence of up to 30%, which is linked with handwriting issues. The factors recognized for assessing these issues are legibility and performance time. Two questionnaires, the Handwriting Proficiency Screening Questionnaire (HPSQ) for teachers and its modification for children (HPSQ-C), were established as quick and valid screening tools along with a third factor - emotional and physical well-being. Until now, in the Czechia, there has been no validated screening tool for D diagnosis. A study was conducted on a set of 294 children from 3rd and 4th year of primary school (132 girls/162 boys; Mage 8.96 ± 0.73) and 21 teachers who spent most of their time with them. Confirmatory factor analysis based on the theoretical background showed poor fit for HPSQ [χ2(32) = 115.07, p < 0.001; comparative fit index (CFI) = 0.95; Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.93; root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.09; standard root mean square residual (SRMR) = 0.05] and excellent fit for HPSQ-C [χ2(32) = 31.12, p = 0.51; CFI = 1.0; TLI = 1.0; RMSEA = 0.0; SRMR = 0.04]. For the HPSQ-C models, there were no differences between boys and girls [Δχ2(7) = 12.55, p = 0.08]. Values of McDonalds's ω indicate excellent (HPSQ, ω = 0.9) and acceptable (HPSQ-C, ω = 0.7) reliability. Boys were assessed as worse writers than girls based on the results of both questionnaires. The grades positively correlate with the total scores of both HPSQ (r = 0.54, p < 0.01) and HPSQ-C (r = 0.28, p < 0.01). Based on the results, for the assessment of handwriting difficulties experienced by Czech children, we recommend using the HPSQ-C questionnaire for research purposes.
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Mekyska, Jiri $u Department of Telecommunications, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Zvončák, Vojtěch $u Department of Telecommunications, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Galáž, Zoltán $u Department of Telecommunications, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Francová, Pavlína $u Department of Psychology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Čechová, Barbora $u Department of Psychology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Losenická, Barbora $u Department of Psychology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Smékal, Zdeněk $u Department of Telecommunications, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Urbánek, Tomáš $u Department of Psychology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Havigerová, Jana Marie $u Department of Psychology, Masaryk University, Brno, Czechia.
- 700 1_
- $a Rosenblum, Sara $u Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00174603 $t Frontiers in psychology $x 1664-1078 $g Roč. 10, č. - (2020), s. 2937
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32038361 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200511 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20210316133521 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ind $b bmc $g 1524153 $s 1095278
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 10 $c - $d 2937 $e 2019 $i 1664-1078 $m Frontiers in psychology $n Front Psychol $x MED00174603
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200511