-
Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?
Using microbial seed coating for improving cowpea productivity under a low-input agricultural system
I. Rocha, P. Souza-Alonso, G. Pereira, Y. Ma, M. Vosátka, H. Freitas, RS. Oliveira,
Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie
Typ dokumentu hodnotící studie, časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016801
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
PTDC/AGR-TEC/1140/2014
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
SFRH/BD/100484/2014
Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
European Social Fund
Foundation for Science and Technology
PubMed
31667839
DOI
10.1002/jsfa.10117
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- Glomeromycota fyziologie MeSH
- mykorhiza fyziologie MeSH
- pěstování plodin metody MeSH
- Pseudomonas fyziologie MeSH
- půda chemie MeSH
- semena rostlinná růst a vývoj mikrobiologie MeSH
- vigna růst a vývoj mikrobiologie MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- hodnotící studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi have the ability to enhance the growth, fitness, and quality of various agricultural crops, including cowpea. However, field trials confirming the benefits of microbes in large-scale applications using economically viable and efficient inoculation methods are still scarce. Microbial seed coating has a great potential for large-scale agriculture through the application of reduced amounts of PGPR and AM fungi inocula. Thus, in this study, the impact of seed coating with PGPR, Pseudomonas libanensis TR1 and AM fungus, Rhizophagus irregularis (single or multiple isolates) on grain yield and nutrient content of cowpea under low-input field conditions was evaluated. RESULTS: Seed coating with P. libanensis + multiple isolates of R. irregularis (coatPMR) resulted in significant increases in shoot dry weight (76%), and in the number of pods and seeds per plant (52% and 56%, respectively) and grain yield (56%), when compared with non-inoculated control plants. However, seed coating with P. libanensis + R. irregularis single-isolate (coatPR) did not influence cowpea grain yield. Grain lipid content was significantly higher (25%) in coatPMR plants in comparison with control. Higher soil organic matter and lower pH were observed in the coatPMR treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that cowpea field productivity can be improved by seed coating with PGPR and multiple AM fungal isolates under low-input agricultural systems. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org
- 000
- 00000naa a2200000 a 4500
- 001
- bmc20005745
- 003
- CZ-PrNML
- 005
- 20200520155703.0
- 007
- ta
- 008
- 200511s2020 xxk f 000 0|eng||
- 009
- AR
- 024 7_
- $a 10.1002/jsfa.10117 $2 doi
- 035 __
- $a (PubMed)31667839
- 040 __
- $a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
- 041 0_
- $a eng
- 044 __
- $a xxk
- 100 1_
- $a Rocha, Inês $u Centre for Functional Ecology - Science for People and the Planet, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
- 245 10
- $a Using microbial seed coating for improving cowpea productivity under a low-input agricultural system / $c I. Rocha, P. Souza-Alonso, G. Pereira, Y. Ma, M. Vosátka, H. Freitas, RS. Oliveira,
- 520 9_
- $a BACKGROUND: Plant-growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi have the ability to enhance the growth, fitness, and quality of various agricultural crops, including cowpea. However, field trials confirming the benefits of microbes in large-scale applications using economically viable and efficient inoculation methods are still scarce. Microbial seed coating has a great potential for large-scale agriculture through the application of reduced amounts of PGPR and AM fungi inocula. Thus, in this study, the impact of seed coating with PGPR, Pseudomonas libanensis TR1 and AM fungus, Rhizophagus irregularis (single or multiple isolates) on grain yield and nutrient content of cowpea under low-input field conditions was evaluated. RESULTS: Seed coating with P. libanensis + multiple isolates of R. irregularis (coatPMR) resulted in significant increases in shoot dry weight (76%), and in the number of pods and seeds per plant (52% and 56%, respectively) and grain yield (56%), when compared with non-inoculated control plants. However, seed coating with P. libanensis + R. irregularis single-isolate (coatPR) did not influence cowpea grain yield. Grain lipid content was significantly higher (25%) in coatPMR plants in comparison with control. Higher soil organic matter and lower pH were observed in the coatPMR treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that cowpea field productivity can be improved by seed coating with PGPR and multiple AM fungal isolates under low-input agricultural systems. © 2019 Society of Chemical Industry.
- 650 _2
- $a pěstování plodin $x metody $7 D000069599
- 650 _2
- $a Glomeromycota $x fyziologie $7 D055137
- 650 _2
- $a mykorhiza $x fyziologie $7 D038821
- 650 _2
- $a Pseudomonas $x fyziologie $7 D011549
- 650 _2
- $a semena rostlinná $x růst a vývoj $x mikrobiologie $7 D012639
- 650 _2
- $a půda $x chemie $7 D012987
- 650 _2
- $a vigna $x růst a vývoj $x mikrobiologie $7 D000070658
- 655 _2
- $a hodnotící studie $7 D023362
- 655 _2
- $a časopisecké články $7 D016428
- 700 1_
- $a Souza-Alonso, Pablo $u Centre for Functional Ecology - Science for People and the Planet, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
- 700 1_
- $a Pereira, Graça $u Biotechnology and Genetic Resources Unit, National Institute for Agrarian and Veterinary Research, Elvas, Portugal.
- 700 1_
- $a Ma, Ying $u Centre for Functional Ecology - Science for People and the Planet, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
- 700 1_
- $a Vosátka, Miroslav $u Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany, Průhonice, Czech Republic.
- 700 1_
- $a Freitas, Helena $u Centre for Functional Ecology - Science for People and the Planet, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
- 700 1_
- $a Oliveira, Rui S $u Centre for Functional Ecology - Science for People and the Planet, Department of Life Sciences, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
- 773 0_
- $w MED00003015 $t Journal of the science of food and agriculture $x 1097-0010 $g Roč. 100, č. 3 (2020), s. 1092-1098
- 856 41
- $u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31667839 $y Pubmed
- 910 __
- $a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
- 990 __
- $a 20200511 $b ABA008
- 991 __
- $a 20200520155702 $b ABA008
- 999 __
- $a ok $b bmc $g 1524603 $s 1095801
- BAS __
- $a 3
- BAS __
- $a PreBMC
- BMC __
- $a 2020 $b 100 $c 3 $d 1092-1098 $e 20191126 $i 1097-0010 $m Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture $n J Sci Food Agric $x MED00003015
- GRA __
- $a POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016801 $p Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- GRA __
- $a PTDC/AGR-TEC/1140/2014 $p Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- GRA __
- $a SFRH/BD/100484/2014 $p Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- GRA __
- $p European Social Fund
- GRA __
- $p Foundation for Science and Technology
- LZP __
- $a Pubmed-20200511