Detail
Článek
Článek online
FT
Medvik - BMČ
  • Je něco špatně v tomto záznamu ?

Inflammation time-axis in aseptic loosening of total knee arthroplasty: A preliminary study

T. Dyskova, E. Kriegova, Z. Slobodova, S. Zehnalova, M. Kudelka, P. Schneiderova, R. Fillerova, J. Gallo,

. 2019 ; 14 (8) : e0221056. [pub] 20190830

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/bmc20005962

Grantová podpora
NV16-31852A MZ0 CEP - Centrální evidence projektů

OBJECTIVE: Aseptic loosening (AL) is the most frequent long-term reason for revision of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) affecting about 15-20% patients within 20 years after the surgery. Although there is a solid body of evidence about the crucial role of inflammation in the AL pathogenesis, scared information on inflammation signature and its time-axis in tissues around TKA exists. DESIGN: The inflammation protein signatures in pseudosynovial tissues collected at revision surgery from patients with AL (AL, n = 12) and those with no clinical/radiographic signs of AL (non-AL, n = 9) were investigated by Proximity Extension Assay (PEA)-Immunoassay and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: AL tissues had elevated levels of TNF-family members sTNFR2, TNFSF14, sFasL, sBAFF, cytokines/chemokines IL8, CCL2, IL1RA/IL36, sIL6R, and growth factors sAREG, CSF1, comparing to non-AL. High interindividual variability in protein levels was evident particularly in non-AL. Levels of sTNFR2, sBAFF, IL8, sIL6R, and MPO discriminated between AL and non-AL and were associated with the time from index surgery, suggesting the cumulative character of inflammatory osteolytic response to prosthetic byproducts. The source of elevated inflammatory molecules was macrophages and multinucleated osteoclast-like cells in AL and histiocytes and osteoclast-like cells in non-AL tissues, respectively. All proteins were present in higher levels in osteoclast-like cells than in macrophages. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed a differential inflammation signature between AL and non-AL stages of TKA. It also highlighted the unique patient's response to TKA in non-AL stages. Further confirmation of our preliminary results on a larger cohort is needed. Analysis of the time-axis of processes ongoing around TKA implantation may help to understand the mechanisms driving periprosthetic bone resorption needed for diagnostic/preventative strategies.

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

000      
00000naa a2200000 a 4500
001      
bmc20005962
003      
CZ-PrNML
005      
20200518132224.0
007      
ta
008      
200511s2019 xxu f 000 0|eng||
009      
AR
024    7_
$a 10.1371/journal.pone.0221056 $2 doi
035    __
$a (PubMed)31469844
040    __
$a ABA008 $b cze $d ABA008 $e AACR2
041    0_
$a eng
044    __
$a xxu
100    1_
$a Dyskova, Tereza $u Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
245    10
$a Inflammation time-axis in aseptic loosening of total knee arthroplasty: A preliminary study / $c T. Dyskova, E. Kriegova, Z. Slobodova, S. Zehnalova, M. Kudelka, P. Schneiderova, R. Fillerova, J. Gallo,
520    9_
$a OBJECTIVE: Aseptic loosening (AL) is the most frequent long-term reason for revision of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) affecting about 15-20% patients within 20 years after the surgery. Although there is a solid body of evidence about the crucial role of inflammation in the AL pathogenesis, scared information on inflammation signature and its time-axis in tissues around TKA exists. DESIGN: The inflammation protein signatures in pseudosynovial tissues collected at revision surgery from patients with AL (AL, n = 12) and those with no clinical/radiographic signs of AL (non-AL, n = 9) were investigated by Proximity Extension Assay (PEA)-Immunoassay and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: AL tissues had elevated levels of TNF-family members sTNFR2, TNFSF14, sFasL, sBAFF, cytokines/chemokines IL8, CCL2, IL1RA/IL36, sIL6R, and growth factors sAREG, CSF1, comparing to non-AL. High interindividual variability in protein levels was evident particularly in non-AL. Levels of sTNFR2, sBAFF, IL8, sIL6R, and MPO discriminated between AL and non-AL and were associated with the time from index surgery, suggesting the cumulative character of inflammatory osteolytic response to prosthetic byproducts. The source of elevated inflammatory molecules was macrophages and multinucleated osteoclast-like cells in AL and histiocytes and osteoclast-like cells in non-AL tissues, respectively. All proteins were present in higher levels in osteoclast-like cells than in macrophages. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed a differential inflammation signature between AL and non-AL stages of TKA. It also highlighted the unique patient's response to TKA in non-AL stages. Further confirmation of our preliminary results on a larger cohort is needed. Analysis of the time-axis of processes ongoing around TKA implantation may help to understand the mechanisms driving periprosthetic bone resorption needed for diagnostic/preventative strategies.
650    _2
$a senioři $7 D000368
650    _2
$a senioři nad 80 let $7 D000369
650    _2
$a totální endoprotéza kolene $x škodlivé účinky $7 D019645
650    _2
$a resorpce kosti $x komplikace $x metabolismus $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D001862
650    _2
$a cytokiny $x metabolismus $7 D016207
650    _2
$a ženské pohlaví $7 D005260
650    _2
$a histiocyty $x metabolismus $x patologie $7 D006644
650    _2
$a lidé $7 D006801
650    _2
$a zánět $x komplikace $x metabolismus $x patofyziologie $x chirurgie $7 D007249
650    _2
$a makrofágy $x metabolismus $x patologie $7 D008264
650    _2
$a mužské pohlaví $7 D008297
650    _2
$a lidé středního věku $7 D008875
650    _2
$a osteoklasty $x metabolismus $x patologie $7 D010010
650    _2
$a selhání protézy $x škodlivé účinky $7 D011475
650    _2
$a reoperace $7 D012086
655    _2
$a časopisecké články $7 D016428
655    _2
$a práce podpořená grantem $7 D013485
700    1_
$a Kriegova, Eva $u Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Slobodova, Zuzana $u Department of Clinical and Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Zehnalova, Sarka $u Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Kudelka, Milos $u Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Schneiderova, Petra $u Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Fillerova, Regina $u Department of Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
700    1_
$a Gallo, Jiri $u Department of Orthopaedics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Palacky University Olomouc and University Hospital Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
773    0_
$w MED00180950 $t PloS one $x 1932-6203 $g Roč. 14, č. 8 (2019), s. e0221056
856    41
$u https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31469844 $y Pubmed
910    __
$a ABA008 $b sig $c sign $y a $z 0
990    __
$a 20200511 $b ABA008
991    __
$a 20200518132224 $b ABA008
999    __
$a ok $b bmc $g 1524820 $s 1096018
BAS    __
$a 3
BAS    __
$a PreBMC
BMC    __
$a 2019 $b 14 $c 8 $d e0221056 $e 20190830 $i 1932-6203 $m PLoS One $n PLoS One $x MED00180950
GRA    __
$a NV16-31852A $p MZ0
LZP    __
$a Pubmed-20200511

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Pouze přihlášení uživatelé

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...